東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Testing a prototypic approach to sca...

Bohlig, E. Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Testing a prototypic approach to scale reduction: Improving efficiency in assessment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Testing a prototypic approach to scale reduction: Improving efficiency in assessment./
作者:	Bohlig, E. Michael.
面頁冊數:	259 p.
附註:	Adviser: William B. Ware.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-03A.
標題:	Education, Educational Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3046965
ISBN:	0493609377

Testing a prototypic approach to scale reduction: Improving efficiency in assessment.
Bohlig, E. Michael.

Testing a prototypic approach to scale reduction: Improving efficiency in assessment. - 259 p.

Adviser: William B. Ware.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2002.

Test development and design are major issues in education, health care, and many other disciplines. The high stakes nature of testing requires high score reliability and validity. However, in many fields, respondent burden is also a serious concern. Modern test theory provides tools to address the need for shorter, more efficient assessment tools. This study assesses an approach to instrument reduction relying on structural equation modeling and item response theory (IRT) that should not only maintain the dimensionality and validity of the original long-form instrument but should have, at most, a negligible effect on reliability. The Teacher's Report Form was used to demonstrate this process. Behavior problem data collected using the Teacher's Report Form (Achenbach, 1991b) were available for a total of 856 children.

ISBN: 0493609377Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017560
Education, Educational Psychology.

Testing a prototypic approach to scale reduction: Improving efficiency in assessment.
LDR:03072nam 2200301 a 45 001 931577
005 20110429
008 110429s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493609377
035 $a (UnM)AAI3046965
035 $a AAI3046965
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Bohlig, E. Michael. $3 1255121
245 1 0 $a Testing a prototypic approach to scale reduction: Improving efficiency in assessment.
300 $a 259 p.
500 $a Adviser: William B. Ware.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A, page: 0913.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2002.
520 $a Test development and design are major issues in education, health care, and many other disciplines. The high stakes nature of testing requires high score reliability and validity. However, in many fields, respondent burden is also a serious concern. Modern test theory provides tools to address the need for shorter, more efficient assessment tools. This study assesses an approach to instrument reduction relying on structural equation modeling and item response theory (IRT) that should not only maintain the dimensionality and validity of the original long-form instrument but should have, at most, a negligible effect on reliability. The Teacher's Report Form was used to demonstrate this process. Behavior problem data collected using the Teacher's Report Form (Achenbach, 1991b) were available for a total of 856 children.
520 $a The purported factor structure of the TRF did not hold in the present data. Eighty-five of the original 120 TRF problem behavior items remained following an exploratory factor analysis that resulted in seven subscales: Aggressive Behavior, Attention Problems, Withdrawn, Anxious/Depressed, Somatic Complaints, Thought Problems, and Emotional Dysregulation. The latter subscale does not exist on the TRF. Two TRF subscales, Social Problems and Delinquent Behavior, were not found in the present data. Applying IRT analyses, 33 of the 85 items were identified for retention in the new screening instrument. Three additional items were included in the final instrument because of their clinical relevance. The final instrument consists of 36 items. The reliability of the new screener as a whole and for four of the final subscales was good to excellent. The reliability for the other two scales, Anxiety and Thought Problems, was not acceptable. Concurrent validity for the new instrument was, for the most part, good. The new instrument was able to predict maltreatment status equally as well as the TRF for the participants for whom this information was available. However, neither instrument could predict maltreatment status better than chance. The limitations of these results were discussed.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $3 1017449
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-03A.
790 $a 0153
790 1 0 $a Ware, William B., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3046965