東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The development and initial validati...

McLeod, Lindsay David.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The development and initial validation of the Domains of Shame Questionnaire.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The development and initial validation of the Domains of Shame Questionnaire./
Author:	McLeod, Lindsay David.
Description:	206 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Ronald R. Holden.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-10B.
Subject:	Psychology, Clinical. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ73311
ISBN:	0612733114

The development and initial validation of the Domains of Shame Questionnaire.
McLeod, Lindsay David.

The development and initial validation of the Domains of Shame Questionnaire. - 206 p.

Adviser: Ronald R. Holden.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Queen's University at Kingston (Canada), 2002.

Three studies were undertaken to examine the merits of conceptualizing shame-proneness across multiple domains. Study 1 described the development of a new measure of shame-proneness, the Domains of Shame Questionnaire, which consists of separate relationship, performance, and appearance shame subscales. In a sample of undergraduate students (<italic>N</italic> = 226), each shame subscale correlated more strongly with established measures of shame-proneness than guilt-proneness. In addition, appearance and performance shame accounted for incremental variance in depression scores above and beyond the established measures. Study 2 involved an independent sample of undergraduate students (<italic>N</italic> = 236) and provided further evidence for the internal consistency and validity of the new measure. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that appearance and performance shame each were significant predictors of depressive symptomatology above and beyond commonly used shame- and guilt-proneness measures. Appearance shame was a specific predictor of suicide ideation and previous suicide attempts. Moreover, appearance shame mediated the relationship between childhood sexual abuse and suicide ideation and attempts, whereas both relationship and appearance shame mediated the relationship between adolescent sexual abuse and a range of measures of maladjustment. Study 3 provided further evidence for the validity of the performance shame subscale. Using a subsample of Study 2 participants (<italic>N</italic> = 80), success or failure on an anagram task was manipulated, and differences in anticipatory anxiety and affective, cognitive, and behavioural responses to success or failure were observed. Participants who had reported higher levels of performance shame experienced greater anxiety in anticipation of the experimental task. When faced with failure, regardless of performance shame scores, individuals reported greater levels of general negative emotions (e.g., less happiness). However, only those with higher performance shame scores reported greater levels of self-conscious emotions (e.g., more humiliation). Individuals with higher performance shame scores also were less likely to attribute failure to a lack of effort. Although high and low scorers did not differ in their endorsement of positive traits following failure, higher scorers endorsed negative traits as self-descriptive to a greater extent. Groups were equally persistent on a subsequent anagram task although there was a trend for individuals who scored higher on performance shame to perform more poorly on this task. Findings were interpreted as providing support for the proposed three dimensions.

ISBN: 0612733114Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

The development and initial validation of the Domains of Shame Questionnaire.
LDR:03600nam 2200277 a 45 001 931551
005 20110429
008 110429s2002 eng d
020 $a 0612733114
035 $a (UnM)AAINQ73311
035 $a AAINQ73311
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a McLeod, Lindsay David. $3 1255094
245 1 0 $a The development and initial validation of the Domains of Shame Questionnaire.
300 $a 206 p.
500 $a Adviser: Ronald R. Holden.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-10, Section: B, page: 4914.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Queen's University at Kingston (Canada), 2002.
520 $a Three studies were undertaken to examine the merits of conceptualizing shame-proneness across multiple domains. Study 1 described the development of a new measure of shame-proneness, the Domains of Shame Questionnaire, which consists of separate relationship, performance, and appearance shame subscales. In a sample of undergraduate students (<italic>N</italic> = 226), each shame subscale correlated more strongly with established measures of shame-proneness than guilt-proneness. In addition, appearance and performance shame accounted for incremental variance in depression scores above and beyond the established measures. Study 2 involved an independent sample of undergraduate students (<italic>N</italic> = 236) and provided further evidence for the internal consistency and validity of the new measure. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that appearance and performance shame each were significant predictors of depressive symptomatology above and beyond commonly used shame- and guilt-proneness measures. Appearance shame was a specific predictor of suicide ideation and previous suicide attempts. Moreover, appearance shame mediated the relationship between childhood sexual abuse and suicide ideation and attempts, whereas both relationship and appearance shame mediated the relationship between adolescent sexual abuse and a range of measures of maladjustment. Study 3 provided further evidence for the validity of the performance shame subscale. Using a subsample of Study 2 participants (<italic>N</italic> = 80), success or failure on an anagram task was manipulated, and differences in anticipatory anxiety and affective, cognitive, and behavioural responses to success or failure were observed. Participants who had reported higher levels of performance shame experienced greater anxiety in anticipation of the experimental task. When faced with failure, regardless of performance shame scores, individuals reported greater levels of general negative emotions (e.g., less happiness). However, only those with higher performance shame scores reported greater levels of self-conscious emotions (e.g., more humiliation). Individuals with higher performance shame scores also were less likely to attribute failure to a lack of effort. Although high and low scorers did not differ in their endorsement of positive traits following failure, higher scorers endorsed negative traits as self-descriptive to a greater extent. Groups were equally persistent on a subsequent anagram task although there was a trend for individuals who scored higher on performance shame to perform more poorly on this task. Findings were interpreted as providing support for the proposed three dimensions.
590 $a School code: 0283.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a Queen's University at Kingston (Canada). $3 1250078
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-10B.
790 $a 0283
790 1 0 $a Holden, Ronald R., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ73311