東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

What do you think about me thinking ...

O'Connell, Maria J.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What do you think about me thinking for myself? Views from two Ohio communities on psychiatric advance directives.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What do you think about me thinking for myself? Views from two Ohio communities on psychiatric advance directives./
作者:	O'Connell, Maria J.
面頁冊數:	114 p.
附註:	Adviser: Catherine H. Stein.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-10B.
標題:	Health Sciences, Mental Health. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3066407
ISBN:	0493856242

What do you think about me thinking for myself? Views from two Ohio communities on psychiatric advance directives.
O'Connell, Maria J.

What do you think about me thinking for myself? Views from two Ohio communities on psychiatric advance directives. - 114 p.

Adviser: Catherine H. Stein.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bowling Green State University, 2002.

The present study used a key informant survey to assess key community stakeholders' knowledge and perceptions of psychiatric advance directives in two Ohio counties-one that was involved in a pilot psychiatric advance directive education project and one that has yet to begin an education initiative. The key informants included legal and law enforcement personnel, clergy, healthcare professionals, and mental health professionals, consumers, and family members. A questionnaire was developed to assess perceptions about psychiatric advance directives, the Opinions about Psychiatric Advance Directives (OPAD) questionnaire. Two hundred and sixty-two key informants completed the OPAD, demographic questions, questions about familiarity with psychiatric advance directives, and provided qualitative comments on the documents. Principal components factor analysis of the OPAD revealed four primary factors: <italic>Obstacles to Success, Utility and Benefits, Essential Professionalism</italic>, and <italic>Self-Determination </italic>. Results indicate that although most of the key informants had never heard of psychiatric advance directives, they generally believed that the documents could positively impact mental health treatment. The results also suggest that despite having relatively positive views, the key informants had considerable concerns about the implementation of psychiatric advance directives. Mental health informants, in general, were more familiar with and had more positive opinions about psychiatric advance directives than other key informants. In particular, mental health key informants in the county that had psychiatric advance directive education were more familiar with and had more positive opinions about psychiatric advance directives than mental health informants in the county without the education. Implications for psychiatric advance directive education are discussed.

ISBN: 0493856242Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017693
Health Sciences, Mental Health.

What do you think about me thinking for myself? Views from two Ohio communities on psychiatric advance directives.
LDR:02839nam 2200277 a 45 001 931493
005 20110429
008 110429s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493856242
035 $a (UnM)AAI3066407
035 $a AAI3066407
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a O'Connell, Maria J. $3 1255036
245 1 0 $a What do you think about me thinking for myself? Views from two Ohio communities on psychiatric advance directives.
300 $a 114 p.
500 $a Adviser: Catherine H. Stein.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-10, Section: B, page: 4917.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bowling Green State University, 2002.
520 $a The present study used a key informant survey to assess key community stakeholders' knowledge and perceptions of psychiatric advance directives in two Ohio counties-one that was involved in a pilot psychiatric advance directive education project and one that has yet to begin an education initiative. The key informants included legal and law enforcement personnel, clergy, healthcare professionals, and mental health professionals, consumers, and family members. A questionnaire was developed to assess perceptions about psychiatric advance directives, the Opinions about Psychiatric Advance Directives (OPAD) questionnaire. Two hundred and sixty-two key informants completed the OPAD, demographic questions, questions about familiarity with psychiatric advance directives, and provided qualitative comments on the documents. Principal components factor analysis of the OPAD revealed four primary factors: <italic>Obstacles to Success, Utility and Benefits, Essential Professionalism</italic>, and <italic>Self-Determination </italic>. Results indicate that although most of the key informants had never heard of psychiatric advance directives, they generally believed that the documents could positively impact mental health treatment. The results also suggest that despite having relatively positive views, the key informants had considerable concerns about the implementation of psychiatric advance directives. Mental health informants, in general, were more familiar with and had more positive opinions about psychiatric advance directives than other key informants. In particular, mental health key informants in the county that had psychiatric advance directive education were more familiar with and had more positive opinions about psychiatric advance directives than mental health informants in the county without the education. Implications for psychiatric advance directive education are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0018.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Mental Health. $3 1017693
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0622
710 2 0 $a Bowling Green State University. $3 676285
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-10B.
790 $a 0018
790 1 0 $a Stein, Catherine H., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3066407