東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

How equity sensitivity affects attit...

Roedder, William Chapman, III.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How equity sensitivity affects attitudes and behaviors.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How equity sensitivity affects attitudes and behaviors./
Author:	Roedder, William Chapman, III.
Description:	197 p.
Notes:	Major Professor: Michael C. Rush.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-08B.
Subject:	Psychology, Industrial. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3022758
ISBN:	0493339647

How equity sensitivity affects attitudes and behaviors.
Roedder, William Chapman, III.

How equity sensitivity affects attitudes and behaviors. - 197 p.

Major Professor: Michael C. Rush.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Tennessee, 2001.

Research on equity sensitivity has continued steadily since the introduction of the construct in 1985. While the initial study (Huseman, Hatfield, & Miles, 1985) examined the relationship of equity sensitivity to job satisfaction, more recent research has expanded the scope of inquiry to include variables such as organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Konovsky & Organ, 1996), and organizational commitment (O'Neill & Mone, 1998). However, the extant research leaves open to debate some major theoretical questions. How does equity sensitivity affect attitudes and behaviors? How are perceptions of justice involved?

ISBN: 0493339647Subjects--Topical Terms:

520063
Psychology, Industrial.

How equity sensitivity affects attitudes and behaviors.
LDR:03155nam 2200313 a 45 001 931468
005 20110429
008 110429s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493339647
035 $a (UnM)AAI3022758
035 $a AAI3022758
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Roedder, William Chapman, III. $3 1255011
245 1 0 $a How equity sensitivity affects attitudes and behaviors.
300 $a 197 p.
500 $a Major Professor: Michael C. Rush.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-08, Section: B, page: 3836.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Tennessee, 2001.
520 $a Research on equity sensitivity has continued steadily since the introduction of the construct in 1985. While the initial study (Huseman, Hatfield, & Miles, 1985) examined the relationship of equity sensitivity to job satisfaction, more recent research has expanded the scope of inquiry to include variables such as organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Konovsky & Organ, 1996), and organizational commitment (O'Neill & Mone, 1998). However, the extant research leaves open to debate some major theoretical questions. How does equity sensitivity affect attitudes and behaviors? How are perceptions of justice involved?
520 $a The current literature suggests three potential models for how equity sensitivity affects attitudes and behaviors. The first model (the Perceptions Only model) contends that equity sensitivity interactively affects perceptions of equity conditions. The second model (the Reactions Only model) contends that equity sensitivity interactively affects reactions to perceptions of equity conditions. The third model (the Perceptions and Reactions model) contends that equity sensitivity interactively affects both perceptions of equity conditions and reactions to these perceptions. The purpose of this study was to determine which of these three models best represents how equity sensitivity influences attitudes and behaviors.
520 $a Results suggested that equity sensitivity did not affect perceptions of distributive justice. Results also suggested that equity sensitivity did not have any reliable interactive effects with perceptions of distributive justice to explain reactions to perceptions of distributive justice. However, additive effects were found for productivity in both tasks. The discussion focuses on three potential explanations for the discrepancy between the expected and obtained results. The first explanation contends that the theory was not fairly tested. The second explanation contends that equity sensitivity theory is inaccurate about the true nature of benevolents and entitleds. The third explanation contends that the current measurement of equity sensitivity is not really measuring sensitivity to equity. It is argued that the latter two explanations are the most plausible.
590 $a School code: 0226.
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0632
710 2 0 $a The University of Tennessee. $3 1022026
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-08B.
790 $a 0226
790 1 0 $a Rush, Michael C., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3022758