東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

There is nothing idle about it: Def...

Young, Randall Curtis.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

There is nothing idle about it: Deference and dominance in gossip as a function of role, personality, and social context.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	There is nothing idle about it: Deference and dominance in gossip as a function of role, personality, and social context./
作者:	Young, Randall Curtis.
面頁冊數:	73 p.
附註:	Chair: Dacher Keltner.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-03B.
標題:	Psychology, Personality. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3044747
ISBN:	0493586466

There is nothing idle about it: Deference and dominance in gossip as a function of role, personality, and social context.
Young, Randall Curtis.

There is nothing idle about it: Deference and dominance in gossip as a function of role, personality, and social context. - 73 p.

Chair: Dacher Keltner.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2001.

I define gossip as a form of off-record communication involving positive or negative reputational information about a specific group member that one individual delivers to a close companion from the same group. Based on this conceptualization, I explored the flow and content of gossip within a group of sorority women. In the first phase of the study, sorority sisters made sociometric ratings about one another. Consistent with the notion that gossip functions as a mechanism of social control, sociometric analyses showed that frequent targets of gossip were more controversial group members. In contrast, sorority sisters who were frequent receivers of gossip had high status and were admired group members. In the second phase of the study, pairs of close friends from the same sorority gossiped about one high status and one low status sorority sister. Half of the pairs were accountable for their gossip and half gossiped in confidence. I predicted that the dominant and deferential content of actual gossip behavior would vary according to role, personality, and social context. In accord with their role in the sorority, frequent targets of gossip were more deferential in their gossip whereas frequent receivers were more dominant. In terms of personality, Machiavellianism correlated positively with highly dominant gossip behavior, whereas social desirability and agreeableness correlated with deferential gossip. Finally, in terms of social context, gossip about high status targets and accountable gossip was more deferential. These findings are consistent with the tenets of Politeness Theory (Brown & Levinson, 1987) and the Approach/Inhibition Theory of Power (Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, 2001), Discussion speculates about the purposes of gossip and areas for future research.

ISBN: 0493586466Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017585
Psychology, Personality.

There is nothing idle about it: Deference and dominance in gossip as a function of role, personality, and social context.
LDR:02758nam 2200289 a 45 001 928415
005 20110426
008 110426s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493586466
035 $a (UnM)AAI3044747
035 $a AAI3044747
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Young, Randall Curtis. $3 1251876
245 1 0 $a There is nothing idle about it: Deference and dominance in gossip as a function of role, personality, and social context.
300 $a 73 p.
500 $a Chair: Dacher Keltner.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: B, page: 1613.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2001.
520 $a I define gossip as a form of off-record communication involving positive or negative reputational information about a specific group member that one individual delivers to a close companion from the same group. Based on this conceptualization, I explored the flow and content of gossip within a group of sorority women. In the first phase of the study, sorority sisters made sociometric ratings about one another. Consistent with the notion that gossip functions as a mechanism of social control, sociometric analyses showed that frequent targets of gossip were more controversial group members. In contrast, sorority sisters who were frequent receivers of gossip had high status and were admired group members. In the second phase of the study, pairs of close friends from the same sorority gossiped about one high status and one low status sorority sister. Half of the pairs were accountable for their gossip and half gossiped in confidence. I predicted that the dominant and deferential content of actual gossip behavior would vary according to role, personality, and social context. In accord with their role in the sorority, frequent targets of gossip were more deferential in their gossip whereas frequent receivers were more dominant. In terms of personality, Machiavellianism correlated positively with highly dominant gossip behavior, whereas social desirability and agreeableness correlated with deferential gossip. Finally, in terms of social context, gossip about high status targets and accountable gossip was more deferential. These findings are consistent with the tenets of Politeness Theory (Brown & Levinson, 1987) and the Approach/Inhibition Theory of Power (Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, 2001), Discussion speculates about the purposes of gossip and areas for future research.
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0625
710 2 0 $a University of California, Berkeley. $3 687832
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-03B.
790 $a 0028
790 1 0 $a Keltner, Dacher, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3044747