東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Choosing our gods and demons: Chris...

Curle, Clinton Timothy.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Choosing our gods and demons: Christianity, disenchantment and human rights discourse.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Choosing our gods and demons: Christianity, disenchantment and human rights discourse./
作者:	Curle, Clinton Timothy.
面頁冊數:	134 p.
附註:	Adviser: Peter Swan.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International40-06.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ66814
ISBN:	0612668142

Choosing our gods and demons: Christianity, disenchantment and human rights discourse.
Curle, Clinton Timothy.

Choosing our gods and demons: Christianity, disenchantment and human rights discourse. - 134 p.

Adviser: Peter Swan.

Thesis (M.A.)--Carleton University (Canada), 2001.

Is there any compatibility between current human rights discourse and Christianity? The present thesis seeks to answer this question at a theoretical level as a necessary precondition to any practical rapprochement between the two universalizing moral frameworks. In order to answer this question the author proposes an interpretation of human rights discourse from the perspective of Max Weber's theory of disenchantment which understands the human rights movement as the West's ongoing attempt to create/discover meaning in the vacuum left by the disappearance of the shared Christian metaphysical framework. With this understanding of human rights, the thesis turns to the work of Ernst Troeltsch in order to establish the requirements for a synthesis of human rights culture and Christianity. These criteria are then used to analyze Max Stackhouse's suggestion that the human rights movement requires public theology as a validation necessary for the survival of human rights. The author concludes that Stackhouse's proposal is a satisfactory compromise, but that this compromise has a high price for both sides; human rights culture must relinquish the immanent orientation which is inherent in Modernity, and Christianity must “liberalize” by adapting its notion of authority when it engages the political sphere of pluralistic society. The author anticipates that the price is too high for both sides in relation to the perceived benefits of such a synthesis.

ISBN: 0612668142Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Choosing our gods and demons: Christianity, disenchantment and human rights discourse.
LDR:02359nam 2200289 a 45 001 927337
005 20110425
008 110425s2001 eng d
020 $a 0612668142
035 $a (UnM)AAIMQ66814
035 $a AAIMQ66814
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Curle, Clinton Timothy. $3 1250895
245 1 0 $a Choosing our gods and demons: Christianity, disenchantment and human rights discourse.
300 $a 134 p.
500 $a Adviser: Peter Swan.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-06, page: 1412.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Carleton University (Canada), 2001.
520 $a Is there any compatibility between current human rights discourse and Christianity? The present thesis seeks to answer this question at a theoretical level as a necessary precondition to any practical rapprochement between the two universalizing moral frameworks. In order to answer this question the author proposes an interpretation of human rights discourse from the perspective of Max Weber's theory of disenchantment which understands the human rights movement as the West's ongoing attempt to create/discover meaning in the vacuum left by the disappearance of the shared Christian metaphysical framework. With this understanding of human rights, the thesis turns to the work of Ernst Troeltsch in order to establish the requirements for a synthesis of human rights culture and Christianity. These criteria are then used to analyze Max Stackhouse's suggestion that the human rights movement requires public theology as a validation necessary for the survival of human rights. The author concludes that Stackhouse's proposal is a satisfactory compromise, but that this compromise has a high price for both sides; human rights culture must relinquish the immanent orientation which is inherent in Modernity, and Christianity must “liberalize” by adapting its notion of authority when it engages the political sphere of pluralistic society. The author anticipates that the price is too high for both sides in relation to the perceived benefits of such a synthesis.
590 $a School code: 0040.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Religion, General. $3 1017453
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
690 $a 0318
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0398
710 2 0 $a Carleton University (Canada). $3 1018407
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 40-06.
790 $a 0040
790 1 0 $a Swan, Peter, $e advisor
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ66814