東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Genetic improvement of lean growth r...

Chen, Peiqi.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Genetic improvement of lean growth rate and reproductive traits in pigs.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Genetic improvement of lean growth rate and reproductive traits in pigs./
作者:	Chen, Peiqi.
面頁冊數:	167 p.
附註:	Major Professors: Tom J. Baas; Kenneth J. Koehler.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-08B.
標題:	Agriculture, Animal Culture and Nutrition. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3061818
ISBN:	0493777962

Genetic improvement of lean growth rate and reproductive traits in pigs.
Chen, Peiqi.

Genetic improvement of lean growth rate and reproductive traits in pigs. - 167 p.

Major Professors: Tom J. Baas; Kenneth J. Koehler.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Iowa State University, 2002.

Breed-specific genetic parameters for lean growth rate (LGR) and reproductive traits were estimated for the U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace populations. Parameters were estimated using an animal model by REML method. Estimates of heritabilities were 0.44, 0.44, 0.46, and 0.39 for LGR; 0.10, 0.09, 0.08, and 0.08 for number born alive; 0.08, 0.07, 0.08, and 0.09 for litter weight at 21 d; and 0.05, 0.07, 0.05, and 0.05 for number weaned in the Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace breeds, respectively. Most genetic correlation estimates between lean growth and litter traits were small but unfavorable across breeds. Backfat thickness had the largest genetic correlations with number born alive (0.18 to 0.20) and litter weight at 21 d (−0.27 to −0.30). A four-generation selection experiment was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of selection for LGR and evaluate the correlated responses in litter traits in a synthetic line of pigs based on a Meishan-Yorkshire cross. The estimate of response to selection per generation was 9.6 ± 0.95 g/d for LGR. Correlated responses in litter traits were regressed on generation. The regression coefficients were negative but not significant (P > 0.05) for number alive at birth, at 21 d, and at 42 d. A significant positive correlated response occurred only for 42-d litter weight (P < 0.05). Five strategies for selection on LGR in pigs that maximize average LGR at the last generation with a planning horizon based on a non-linear biological function were evaluated through simulation over five generations. A linear index with updating index weights yielded the highest LGR at the last generation. The non-linear index performed almost as well as the linear index with updating. Direct selection on single-trait EBV for LGR yielded the lowest responses at generation 5. Direct selection on multi-trait EBV for LGR yielded 3.1% higher responses in LGR than selection on single-trait EBV for LGR (<italic> P</italic> < 0.05). It was concluded that simultaneous genetic improvement in LGR and reproductive traits is possible by using breed-specific genetic parameter estimates or creating a synthetic line through selection for LGR based on a appropriate selection criteria.

ISBN: 0493777962Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017857
Agriculture, Animal Culture and Nutrition.

Genetic improvement of lean growth rate and reproductive traits in pigs.
LDR:03212nam 2200289 a 45 001 927235
005 20110425
008 110425s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493777962
035 $a (UnM)AAI3061818
035 $a AAI3061818
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Chen, Peiqi. $3 1250786
245 1 0 $a Genetic improvement of lean growth rate and reproductive traits in pigs.
300 $a 167 p.
500 $a Major Professors: Tom J. Baas; Kenneth J. Koehler.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-08, Section: B, page: 3522.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Iowa State University, 2002.
520 $a Breed-specific genetic parameters for lean growth rate (LGR) and reproductive traits were estimated for the U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace populations. Parameters were estimated using an animal model by REML method. Estimates of heritabilities were 0.44, 0.44, 0.46, and 0.39 for LGR; 0.10, 0.09, 0.08, and 0.08 for number born alive; 0.08, 0.07, 0.08, and 0.09 for litter weight at 21 d; and 0.05, 0.07, 0.05, and 0.05 for number weaned in the Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace breeds, respectively. Most genetic correlation estimates between lean growth and litter traits were small but unfavorable across breeds. Backfat thickness had the largest genetic correlations with number born alive (0.18 to 0.20) and litter weight at 21 d (−0.27 to −0.30). A four-generation selection experiment was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of selection for LGR and evaluate the correlated responses in litter traits in a synthetic line of pigs based on a Meishan-Yorkshire cross. The estimate of response to selection per generation was 9.6 ± 0.95 g/d for LGR. Correlated responses in litter traits were regressed on generation. The regression coefficients were negative but not significant (P > 0.05) for number alive at birth, at 21 d, and at 42 d. A significant positive correlated response occurred only for 42-d litter weight (P < 0.05). Five strategies for selection on LGR in pigs that maximize average LGR at the last generation with a planning horizon based on a non-linear biological function were evaluated through simulation over five generations. A linear index with updating index weights yielded the highest LGR at the last generation. The non-linear index performed almost as well as the linear index with updating. Direct selection on single-trait EBV for LGR yielded the lowest responses at generation 5. Direct selection on multi-trait EBV for LGR yielded 3.1% higher responses in LGR than selection on single-trait EBV for LGR (<italic> P</italic> < 0.05). It was concluded that simultaneous genetic improvement in LGR and reproductive traits is possible by using breed-specific genetic parameter estimates or creating a synthetic line through selection for LGR based on a appropriate selection criteria.
590 $a School code: 0097.
650 4 $a Agriculture, Animal Culture and Nutrition. $3 1017857
650 4 $a Biology, Genetics. $3 1017730
690 $a 0369
690 $a 0475
710 2 0 $a Iowa State University. $3 1017855
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-08B.
790 $a 0097
790 1 0 $a Baas, Tom J., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Koehler, Kenneth J., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3061818