東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Medical benefit and the human lotter...

Waring, Duff R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Medical benefit and the human lottery: An egalitarian approach to patient selection.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Medical benefit and the human lottery: An egalitarian approach to patient selection./
作者:	Waring, Duff R.
面頁冊數:	382 p.
附註:	Adviser: Lesley Jacobs.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-02A.
標題:	Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ66368
ISBN:	061266368X

Medical benefit and the human lottery: An egalitarian approach to patient selection.
Waring, Duff R.

Medical benefit and the human lottery: An egalitarian approach to patient selection. - 382 p.

Adviser: Lesley Jacobs.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University (Canada), 2001.

The central issue of this dissertation is known in bioethics as the problem of fair chances versus best outcomes. The decision-making context is patient selection for scarce, transplantable organs. This problem poses two options for patient selection: either select by a procedure which affords fair chances to all medically suitable transplant candidates or select those whose prognoses indicate the highest levels of prospective medical benefit. The fair chances/best outcomes problem is essentially a problem of choosing between lives. An egalitarian approach to patient selection favours fair chances. A utilitarian approach favours best outcomes. My project is a sustained defence of an egalitarian approach. It targets first a rule utilitarian argument for maximizing medical benefit. It targets second an argument that fairness in patient selection requires a preference for saving younger lives. I argue that patients should have prognoses at or above a threshold level of medical benefit to be medically suitable candidates. I propose random selection by lottery as a means of final selection that equally values lives. I argue that equality of opportunity best reflects an egalitarian commitment to equal concern and respect.

ISBN: 061266368XSubjects--Topical Terms:

1017756
Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery.

Medical benefit and the human lottery: An egalitarian approach to patient selection.
LDR:02120nam 2200277 a 45 001 926748
005 20110422
008 110422s2001 eng d
020 $a 061266368X
035 $a (UnM)AAINQ66368
035 $a AAINQ66368
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Waring, Duff R. $3 1250332
245 1 0 $a Medical benefit and the human lottery: An egalitarian approach to patient selection.
300 $a 382 p.
500 $a Adviser: Lesley Jacobs.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-02, Section: A, page: 0622.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University (Canada), 2001.
520 $a The central issue of this dissertation is known in bioethics as the problem of fair chances versus best outcomes. The decision-making context is patient selection for scarce, transplantable organs. This problem poses two options for patient selection: either select by a procedure which affords fair chances to all medically suitable transplant candidates or select those whose prognoses indicate the highest levels of prospective medical benefit. The fair chances/best outcomes problem is essentially a problem of choosing between lives. An egalitarian approach to patient selection favours fair chances. A utilitarian approach favours best outcomes. My project is a sustained defence of an egalitarian approach. It targets first a rule utilitarian argument for maximizing medical benefit. It targets second an argument that fairness in patient selection requires a preference for saving younger lives. I argue that patients should have prognoses at or above a threshold level of medical benefit to be medically suitable candidates. I propose random selection by lottery as a means of final selection that equally values lives. I argue that equality of opportunity best reflects an egalitarian commitment to equal concern and respect.
590 $a School code: 0267.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery. $3 1017756
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0564
710 2 0 $a York University (Canada). $3 1017889
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 63-02A.
790 $a 0267
790 1 0 $a Jacobs, Lesley, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NQ66368