東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Peasant science: Farmer research and...

University of California, Irvine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Peasant science: Farmer research and Philippine rice development.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Peasant science: Farmer research and Philippine rice development./
作者:	Frossard, David Robert.
面頁冊數:	236 p.
附註:	Chair: Frank Cancian.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International55-08A.
標題:	Anthropology, Cultural. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9500572

Peasant science: Farmer research and Philippine rice development.
Frossard, David Robert.

Peasant science: Farmer research and Philippine rice development. - 236 p.

Chair: Frank Cancian.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 1994.

Peasant farmers in the Philippines and elsewhere are often depicted as fundamentally (and irrationally) opposed to change, science, and "progress" by modernizationist development-industry professionals. This view helps to legitimize government efforts to impose official, "top-down" agricultural-development schemes such as the "Green Revolution" on rural people. One group of Philippine farmers (called MASIPAG) contests the prevailing wisdom. Adopting the scientific crop-development techniques of the nearby International Rice Research Institute--learned through a partnership with disaffected nationalist academics from the University of the Philippines agricultural campus at Los Banos--these "peasant scientists" now hybridize and select rice varieties to meet their own criteria for good taste, disease resistance, environmental sustainability, and low cost (qualities they find lacking in IRRI-produced rice and its associated technology). By duplicating selected scientific rice-production methods in their Nueva Ecija Province rice-breeding station (though to ends different from IRRI's), these farmers also hope to claim some of the credibility, power, autonomy, and status accruing to "official" agricultural-research institutes and scientists. Thus, peasant scientists turn images of supposed "anti-science" peasants upside-down and make science itself a tool for self-empowerment. For their part, the dissident scientists of the MASIPAG farmer-scientist partnership gain powerful nationalist rhetorical tools because they can claim to "speak for the farmers" (who are their partners) about national crop-development policy and other political issues. The practice of peasant science challenges several strands of mainstream social-science peasant theory, and contests scientific claims of exclusive access to a superior form of knowing. It also suggests new paradigms of participatory farmer-centered development and new roles for development professionals.Subjects--Topical Terms:

735016
Anthropology, Cultural.

Peasant science: Farmer research and Philippine rice development.
LDR:02835nmm 2200277 a 45 001 887018
005 20101020
008 101020s1994 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (UMI)AAI9500572
035 $a AAI9500572
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Frossard, David Robert. $3 1058745
245 1 0 $a Peasant science: Farmer research and Philippine rice development.
300 $a 236 p.
500 $a Chair: Frank Cancian.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-08, Section: A, page: 2452.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 1994.
520 $a Peasant farmers in the Philippines and elsewhere are often depicted as fundamentally (and irrationally) opposed to change, science, and "progress" by modernizationist development-industry professionals. This view helps to legitimize government efforts to impose official, "top-down" agricultural-development schemes such as the "Green Revolution" on rural people. One group of Philippine farmers (called MASIPAG) contests the prevailing wisdom. Adopting the scientific crop-development techniques of the nearby International Rice Research Institute--learned through a partnership with disaffected nationalist academics from the University of the Philippines agricultural campus at Los Banos--these "peasant scientists" now hybridize and select rice varieties to meet their own criteria for good taste, disease resistance, environmental sustainability, and low cost (qualities they find lacking in IRRI-produced rice and its associated technology). By duplicating selected scientific rice-production methods in their Nueva Ecija Province rice-breeding station (though to ends different from IRRI's), these farmers also hope to claim some of the credibility, power, autonomy, and status accruing to "official" agricultural-research institutes and scientists. Thus, peasant scientists turn images of supposed "anti-science" peasants upside-down and make science itself a tool for self-empowerment. For their part, the dissident scientists of the MASIPAG farmer-scientist partnership gain powerful nationalist rhetorical tools because they can claim to "speak for the farmers" (who are their partners) about national crop-development policy and other political issues. The practice of peasant science challenges several strands of mainstream social-science peasant theory, and contests scientific claims of exclusive access to a superior form of knowing. It also suggests new paradigms of participatory farmer-centered development and new roles for development professionals.
590 $a School code: 0030.
650 4 $a Anthropology, Cultural. $3 735016
650 4 $a Economics, Agricultural. $3 626648
650 4 $a History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. $3 626624
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0503
710 2 $a University of California, Irvine. $3 705821
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 55-08A.
790 $a 0030
790 1 0 $a Cancian, Frank, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1994
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9500572