東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Manufacturing religion: The discours...

University of Toronto (Canada).

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Manufacturing religion: The discourse of sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Manufacturing religion: The discourse of sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia./
作者:	McCutcheon, Russell Tracey.
面頁冊數:	318 p.
附註:	Adviser: Neil McMullin.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International58-06A.
標題:	Language, Rhetoric and Composition. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NN18974
ISBN:	9780612189744

Manufacturing religion: The discourse of sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia.
McCutcheon, Russell Tracey.

Manufacturing religion: The discourse of sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia. - 318 p.

Adviser: Neil McMullin.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 1995.

This dissertation argues that the scholarly category of 'sui generis religion' has been an effective discursive strategy both for establishing the institutionally autonomous discipline known in North America as the History of Religions and for privileging certain socio-political claims. This study contributes to the current debate on clarifying the place of reductionism in the study of religion insomuch as it questions whether recent critiques of sui generis religion have been accurate in characterizing it as a religious claim. Apart from any religious implications or motivations that such a claim might entail, the purported socio-historical autonomy of religion carries with it profound discursive as well as political implications. To test this hypothesis, a variety of data are examined in light of the ways in which discursive and rhetorical strategies privilege and authorize scholarly representations of religion as a socially autonomous, and therefore nonreducible, experience. The main data comprise: (i) the interpretive controversy over the life and scholarly works of Mircea Eliade; (ii) examples drawn from Eliade's methods and theories; (iii) world religions textbooks; (iv) media and scholarly representations of Vietnamese Buddhist suicides in the early 1960s. These and a variety of other examples are employed as suitable instances of a much wider and more pervasive discourse on sui generis religion. In each of these representative cases, the study examines how the claim that religion is sui generis, along with the methods of study sanctioned by this claim, serves as a protective strategy that can ultimately authorize and normativize a socio-political programme. The study concludes by identifying possible directions for future research and suggests that the system of generalizations and dehistoricizations sanctioned by the sui generis strategy, evident throughout much of the academic study of religion as a whole, can be interpreted not only on a discursive and political scale of analysis but, finally, on a larger geo-political scale. On this scale, the study of religion as an ahistorical category participates in a larger system of political domination and economic and cultural imperialism.

ISBN: 9780612189744Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019205
Language, Rhetoric and Composition.

Manufacturing religion: The discourse of sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia.
LDR:03152nmm 2200289 a 45 001 874184
005 20100823
008 100823s1995 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780612189744
035 $a (UMI)AAINN18974
035 $a AAINN18974
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a McCutcheon, Russell Tracey. $3 1043444
245 1 0 $a Manufacturing religion: The discourse of sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia.
300 $a 318 p.
500 $a Adviser: Neil McMullin.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-06, Section: A, page: 2252.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 1995.
520 $a This dissertation argues that the scholarly category of 'sui generis religion' has been an effective discursive strategy both for establishing the institutionally autonomous discipline known in North America as the History of Religions and for privileging certain socio-political claims. This study contributes to the current debate on clarifying the place of reductionism in the study of religion insomuch as it questions whether recent critiques of sui generis religion have been accurate in characterizing it as a religious claim. Apart from any religious implications or motivations that such a claim might entail, the purported socio-historical autonomy of religion carries with it profound discursive as well as political implications. To test this hypothesis, a variety of data are examined in light of the ways in which discursive and rhetorical strategies privilege and authorize scholarly representations of religion as a socially autonomous, and therefore nonreducible, experience. The main data comprise: (i) the interpretive controversy over the life and scholarly works of Mircea Eliade; (ii) examples drawn from Eliade's methods and theories; (iii) world religions textbooks; (iv) media and scholarly representations of Vietnamese Buddhist suicides in the early 1960s. These and a variety of other examples are employed as suitable instances of a much wider and more pervasive discourse on sui generis religion. In each of these representative cases, the study examines how the claim that religion is sui generis, along with the methods of study sanctioned by this claim, serves as a protective strategy that can ultimately authorize and normativize a socio-political programme. The study concludes by identifying possible directions for future research and suggests that the system of generalizations and dehistoricizations sanctioned by the sui generis strategy, evident throughout much of the academic study of religion as a whole, can be interpreted not only on a discursive and political scale of analysis but, finally, on a larger geo-political scale. On this scale, the study of religion as an ahistorical category participates in a larger system of political domination and economic and cultural imperialism.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 1019205
650 4 $a Religion, General. $3 1017453
650 4 $a Religion, History of. $3 1017471
690 $a 0318
690 $a 0320
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1017674
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 58-06A.
790 $a 0779
790 1 0 $a McMullin, Neil, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1995
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NN18974