東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Colonialism, natural right, and the ...

State University of New York at Stony Brook.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Colonialism, natural right, and the problem of jurisdiction: Modern natural law theory and Hegel's critique.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Colonialism, natural right, and the problem of jurisdiction: Modern natural law theory and Hegel's critique./
作者:	Kautzer, Chad.
面頁冊數:	312 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-12, Section: A, page: 4742.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-12A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3340108
ISBN:	9780549942993

Colonialism, natural right, and the problem of jurisdiction: Modern natural law theory and Hegel's critique.
Kautzer, Chad.

Colonialism, natural right, and the problem of jurisdiction: Modern natural law theory and Hegel's critique. - 312 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-12, Section: A, page: 4742.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2008.

It has been commonplace to associate the modern natural-law tradition with the social contract, which grounds legitimate political sovereignty and, occasionally, private property in an implicit or explicit consensual act. Whether the result is absolutism or republicanism, the individuals constituting the contractual foundation of political society are typically theorized in a state of nature. This tradition, however, also offers a set of nonconsensual arguments for the same---arguments traditionally obscured or marginalized in the secondary literature, for they have not been recognized as responses to pressing justificatory problems engendered by European colonialism's extra-national jurisdictional and proprietary claims.

ISBN: 9780549942993Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Colonialism, natural right, and the problem of jurisdiction: Modern natural law theory and Hegel's critique.
LDR:02894nam 2200253 a 45 001 861257
005 20100719
008 100719s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549942993
035 $a (UMI)AAI3340108
035 $a AAI3340108
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Kautzer, Chad. $3 1028936
245 1 0 $a Colonialism, natural right, and the problem of jurisdiction: Modern natural law theory and Hegel's critique.
300 $a 312 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-12, Section: A, page: 4742.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2008.
520 $a It has been commonplace to associate the modern natural-law tradition with the social contract, which grounds legitimate political sovereignty and, occasionally, private property in an implicit or explicit consensual act. Whether the result is absolutism or republicanism, the individuals constituting the contractual foundation of political society are typically theorized in a state of nature. This tradition, however, also offers a set of nonconsensual arguments for the same---arguments traditionally obscured or marginalized in the secondary literature, for they have not been recognized as responses to pressing justificatory problems engendered by European colonialism's extra-national jurisdictional and proprietary claims.
520 $a Although Hegel was an advocate of colonialism, arguing it to be a structural necessity in his Philosophy of Right, he also articulated one of the most trenchant critiques of the natural-law and social-contract tradition, undermining the philosophical foundations of previous rights-based claims in the colonies. In this dissertation, I reconstruct, compare, and critique of modern natural law (particularly Locke) and German Idealist (particularly Hegel) justifications of colonial jurisdiction and the theories of right, property, sovereignty, and personality that constitute them. In addition to an epistemic and materialist reading of Locke's theories of property and sovereignty in the context of British colonialism, an immanent critique of Hegel's Phenomenology on the significance of modern colonialism for objective spirit, and the problems of colonial jurisdiction in the Philosophy of Right, my project tells something of an untold story about the evolution of the concept of dominium in theories of public and private right. This story supports the conclusion that the irresolvable problems with respect to the establishment of colonial jurisdiction, through public or private means, are also problems for the establishment of jurisdiction, and thus of right, within the colonizing nation-states themselves.
590 $a School code: 0771.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a State University of New York at Stony Brook. $3 1019194
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-12A.
790 $a 0771
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3340108