東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

"Inappropriate" appropriations of pl...

University of Michigan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

"Inappropriate" appropriations of planning ideas: Informalizing the formal and localizing the global.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	"Inappropriate" appropriations of planning ideas: Informalizing the formal and localizing the global./
作者:	Vidyarthi, Sanjeev.
面頁冊數:	293 p.
附註:	Advisers: Aseem Inam; Gavin M. Shatkin.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-09A.
標題:	Architecture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3328982
ISBN:	9780549820512

"Inappropriate" appropriations of planning ideas: Informalizing the formal and localizing the global.
Vidyarthi, Sanjeev.

"Inappropriate" appropriations of planning ideas: Informalizing the formal and localizing the global. - 293 p.

Advisers: Aseem Inam; Gavin M. Shatkin.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2008.

This research explores how the American planning idea of the neighborhood unit was implemented in India, why and how the recipient society appropriated the concept, and what that means for how Indian cities actually develop. Using insights from cultural studies, anthropology, planning, and historiography this research examines the adaptation of the concept at the national and state level, and document and analyzes the spatial transformation of three built neighborhood units in the city of Jaipur. It does so by employing a combination of four research methods within a case study approach: archival research, analysis of built up areas using Geographical Information System (GIS), the neighborhood history calendar technique, and semi-structured open-ended interviews.

ISBN: 9780549820512Subjects--Topical Terms:

523581
Architecture.

"Inappropriate" appropriations of planning ideas: Informalizing the formal and localizing the global.
LDR:03557nam 2200325 a 45 001 858671
005 20100713
008 100713s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549820512
035 $a (UMI)AAI3328982
035 $a AAI3328982
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Vidyarthi, Sanjeev. $3 1025789
245 1 0 $a "Inappropriate" appropriations of planning ideas: Informalizing the formal and localizing the global.
300 $a 293 p.
500 $a Advisers: Aseem Inam; Gavin M. Shatkin.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-09, Section: A, page: 3777.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2008.
520 $a This research explores how the American planning idea of the neighborhood unit was implemented in India, why and how the recipient society appropriated the concept, and what that means for how Indian cities actually develop. Using insights from cultural studies, anthropology, planning, and historiography this research examines the adaptation of the concept at the national and state level, and document and analyzes the spatial transformation of three built neighborhood units in the city of Jaipur. It does so by employing a combination of four research methods within a case study approach: archival research, analysis of built up areas using Geographical Information System (GIS), the neighborhood history calendar technique, and semi-structured open-ended interviews.
520 $a This research reveals that the aspirations of elites and the contemporary planning and development agendas of recently independent India facilitated the introduction and institutionalization of the neighborhood unit concept. However, a range of actors including planners contributed towards the appropriation of the neighborhood unit. Indian planners attempted to adapt and translate the concept in order to translocate its American origins into Indian patrimony. This enabled planners to claim equal ownership of the concept and helped internalize it. The residents appropriated the envisaged spatiality of built units by transforming residential land use into commercial, encroaching on open setbacks to build residential extensions, and building temples in what were intended to be recreational parks. In addition, the urban poor have built informal settlements on the peripheries of these neighborhood units, and the state and its capillary organizations such as the Housing Board and Urban Development Authority have appropriated the open spaces and planned land uses.
520 $a This study reveals that everyday practices of residents have substantially enriched the simple planning concept through a diverse range of appropriations. Such a pervasiveness of appropriations suggests patterns of collective behaviors that call for more multifaceted and historic studies of Indian cities in order to plan efficiently. It also calls for revisiting present subdivision norms that emphasis residential land use and proscribe other uses in neighborhoods apart from a few convenience shops. Planners and policy-makers, once they begin to appreciate the worth of these informalities, have sufficient ingredients at hand to create rich, lively and diverse neighborhoods in Indian cities.
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Architecture. $3 523581
650 4 $a Landscape Architecture. $3 890923
650 4 $a Urban and Regional Planning. $3 1017841
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0729
690 $a 0999
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $3 777416
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-09A.
790 $a 0127
790 1 0 $a Inam, Aseem, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Shatkin, Gavin M., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3328982