東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The concept of aggression in the wor...

Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The concept of aggression in the work of Freud, Klein and Winnicott.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The concept of aggression in the work of Freud, Klein and Winnicott./
作者:	Bott, James.
面頁冊數:	100 p.
附註:	Advisers: Nancy McWilliams; Lew Gantwerk.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-09B.
標題:	Psychology, Clinical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3233689
ISBN:	9780542874475

The concept of aggression in the work of Freud, Klein and Winnicott.
Bott, James.

The concept of aggression in the work of Freud, Klein and Winnicott. - 100 p.

Advisers: Nancy McWilliams; Lew Gantwerk.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, 2005.

In psychoanalytic literature and clinical discourse today, the meaning of the term "aggression" is often unclear. Given that the contemporary use of the term is built upon the foundations set by early psychoanalysts, this theoretical study explores the varied ways aggression was conceptualized by Sigmund Freud, Melanie Klein and D.W. Winnicott, respectively. Each theorist described aggression as a particular kind of phenomenon and consequently had distinct, although sometimes only implicit, definitions for the term. For Freud and Klein, aggression was understood as some-thing in our bodies, the rather concretized manifestation of a death instinct forever generating particular urges within us. In contrast, Winnicott described aggression largely as a process, an ephemeral activity that may or may not take place between people. These theorists variously define aggression as destructive cellular energy (Freud), hard-wired animosity (Klein), and a calling out for human responsiveness (Winnicott). Related to their respective concepts of aggression, each theorist also held particular ideas about the causes of harm and hostility. After 1920, Freud asserted that people have an inborn tendency toward self-destruction. In accordance with his economic model of the psyche, he also thought that people may be hostile to others in an effort to reduce destructive energy that would otherwise be self-directed. Klein amplified this idea, stating that this dissolving and destructive intent is the primary human motivation. In contrast to his predecessors, Winnicott believed that people are not naturally inclined to harm or destroy, although he recognized that humans may end up doing so if their more basic needs for stability and connection are somehow threatened.

ISBN: 9780542874475Subjects--Topical Terms:

524864
Psychology, Clinical.

The concept of aggression in the work of Freud, Klein and Winnicott.
LDR:02779nam 2200289 a 45 001 858460
005 20100712
008 100712s2005 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780542874475
035 $a (UMI)AAI3233689
035 $a AAI3233689
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Bott, James. $3 1025513
245 1 4 $a The concept of aggression in the work of Freud, Klein and Winnicott.
300 $a 100 p.
500 $a Advisers: Nancy McWilliams; Lew Gantwerk.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-09, Section: B, page: 5390.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, 2005.
520 $a In psychoanalytic literature and clinical discourse today, the meaning of the term "aggression" is often unclear. Given that the contemporary use of the term is built upon the foundations set by early psychoanalysts, this theoretical study explores the varied ways aggression was conceptualized by Sigmund Freud, Melanie Klein and D.W. Winnicott, respectively. Each theorist described aggression as a particular kind of phenomenon and consequently had distinct, although sometimes only implicit, definitions for the term. For Freud and Klein, aggression was understood as some-thing in our bodies, the rather concretized manifestation of a death instinct forever generating particular urges within us. In contrast, Winnicott described aggression largely as a process, an ephemeral activity that may or may not take place between people. These theorists variously define aggression as destructive cellular energy (Freud), hard-wired animosity (Klein), and a calling out for human responsiveness (Winnicott). Related to their respective concepts of aggression, each theorist also held particular ideas about the causes of harm and hostility. After 1920, Freud asserted that people have an inborn tendency toward self-destruction. In accordance with his economic model of the psyche, he also thought that people may be hostile to others in an effort to reduce destructive energy that would otherwise be self-directed. Klein amplified this idea, stating that this dissolving and destructive intent is the primary human motivation. In contrast to his predecessors, Winnicott believed that people are not naturally inclined to harm or destroy, although he recognized that humans may end up doing so if their more basic needs for stability and connection are somehow threatened.
590 $a School code: 0542.
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0622
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology. $3 1022585
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-09B.
790 $a 0542
790 1 0 $a Gantwerk, Lew, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a McWilliams, Nancy, $e advisor
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3233689