東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Disturbing psychoanalytic origins: ...

University of Florida.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Disturbing psychoanalytic origins: A Derridean reading of Freudian theory.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Disturbing psychoanalytic origins: A Derridean reading of Freudian theory./
作者:	Anders, Eric W.
面頁冊數:	393 p.
附註:	Chair: John P. Leavey, Jr.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International61-12A.
標題:	Literature, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9997768
ISBN:	9780493059143

Disturbing psychoanalytic origins: A Derridean reading of Freudian theory.
Anders, Eric W.

Disturbing psychoanalytic origins: A Derridean reading of Freudian theory. - 393 p.

Chair: John P. Leavey, Jr.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2000.

This Derridean reading of Freud asks the question of how we should read Freud with respect to sexual difference and what Derrida considers a radicalized concept of trace, a "scene of writing" of differance ---that is, how we should read Freud with respect to phallogocentrism. Throughout I consider the possible relationships between the "mainstyles" (Derrida) of various psychoanalyses, deconstructions, and feminisms. By analyzing what is most original for Freud---the cause of hysteria, the navel of the dream, the perceptual identity, the primal phantasies, for example---I find that Freud consistently seeks a single origin, a "caput Nili," on which to base a grand narrative. At first this narrative is an etiology of hysteria, but it evolves into a masterplot of sexual development and later into one of humanity. The establishment of an oedipal origin and telos, and the masterplot based on them, moves psychoanalysis toward a totalizing theory, and therefore its openness to chance and something beyond what that theory can master is greatly reduced.

ISBN: 9780493059143Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018152
Literature, General.

Disturbing psychoanalytic origins: A Derridean reading of Freudian theory.
LDR:03569nam 2200301 a 45 001 858446
005 20100712
008 100712s2000 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780493059143
035 $a (UMI)AAI9997768
035 $a AAI9997768
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Anders, Eric W. $3 1025498
245 1 0 $a Disturbing psychoanalytic origins: A Derridean reading of Freudian theory.
300 $a 393 p.
500 $a Chair: John P. Leavey, Jr.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-12, Section: A, page: 4758.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2000.
520 $a This Derridean reading of Freud asks the question of how we should read Freud with respect to sexual difference and what Derrida considers a radicalized concept of trace, a "scene of writing" of differance ---that is, how we should read Freud with respect to phallogocentrism. Throughout I consider the possible relationships between the "mainstyles" (Derrida) of various psychoanalyses, deconstructions, and feminisms. By analyzing what is most original for Freud---the cause of hysteria, the navel of the dream, the perceptual identity, the primal phantasies, for example---I find that Freud consistently seeks a single origin, a "caput Nili," on which to base a grand narrative. At first this narrative is an etiology of hysteria, but it evolves into a masterplot of sexual development and later into one of humanity. The establishment of an oedipal origin and telos, and the masterplot based on them, moves psychoanalysis toward a totalizing theory, and therefore its openness to chance and something beyond what that theory can master is greatly reduced.
520 $a I approach these topics in terms of a question of the ethics of psychoanalysis. This appropriative or reductive process of Freud's masterplotting is based on what Derrida calls "castration-truth" in his reading of Lacan, "Le facteur de la verite." In contrast to some theorists who appeal to the radical spirit of Freudian theory as a basis for their radicalization of psychoanalysis---specifically Barnaby B. Barratt's Psychoanalysis and the Postmodern Impulse---I argue that Lacan's phallogocentric "return to Freud" is actually a more faithful one since I find both "mainstyles" of these psychoanalyses based on a logic of lack or "castration-truth." I argue throughout that the radical spirit of Freud is at times overemphasized or exaggerated by Derridean theorists---and even Derrida himself, though rarely---and that the dominant specter of Freud is an "establishment" or appropriative one, rather than one which is radical or "other-wise." I connect this trend of Derridean thinkers claiming too much debt to psychoanalysis to these thinkers not taking seriously Freud's commitment and interest in an idealized phylogenetics: "phylo-'genetics.'" Since my establishment of this establishment specter of Freud as the "mainstyle" of Freudian theory itself risks reproducing exactly the kind of appropriative discourse I hope to problematize, I attempt to avoid such a reproduction by considering what remains of the radical spirit of Freudian theory in what might be called a deconstructive "technology of iterability;" a "cyborg-analysis;" or what I call "post(al)-psychoanalysis."
590 $a School code: 0070.
650 4 $a Literature, General. $3 1018152
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
690 $a 0401
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a University of Florida. $3 718949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 61-12A.
790 $a 0070
790 1 0 $a Leavey, John P., Jr., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2000
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9997768