東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Rethinking the reasonable person: Cu...

University of Toronto (Canada).

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Rethinking the reasonable person: Custom, equality and the objective standard.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rethinking the reasonable person: Custom, equality and the objective standard./
作者:	Moran, Mayo.
面頁冊數:	315 p.
附註:	Adviser: Ernest Weinrib.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International60-08A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=NQ41086
ISBN:	9780612410862

Rethinking the reasonable person: Custom, equality and the objective standard.
Moran, Mayo.

Rethinking the reasonable person: Custom, equality and the objective standard. - 315 p.

Adviser: Ernest Weinrib.

Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 1999.

Although the reasonable person has been the central figure in the law of negligence at least since Vaughan v. Menlove, he continues to provoke as many questions as he answers---questions that have become increasingly pressing given recent challenges to the reasonable person as inherently male, privileged and otherwise oppressive as a behavioural standard. This work addresses the defensibility of the standard in light of such challenges. The thesis begins by analysing the operation and justification of the standard in the treatment of the mentally disabled and of children, an analysis which reveals that the standard of reasonableness is deeply indebted to conceptions of what is normal or ordinary. The thesis goes on to examine the role of conceptions of the 'normal', not only for the mentally disabled but also for women and those disadvantaged on other grounds including race and class. It turns out that because of the discriminatory implications of reliance on the 'normal', the treatment of various groups under the objective standard raises profound concerns about equality and ultimately about the rule of law. The thesis then asks whether, given these difficulties, the objective standard is worth saving. Although plagued by its own contradictions, the feminist debate is invaluable here: it explicates the strengths and weaknesses of the standard and highlights constitutive tensions between equality, custom and the rule of law. And feminist analyses lead us to conclude that under certain conditions the objective standard is actually invaluable for equality-seekers. This debate also affords the most concrete illustration of how one might go about reformulating the standard to ensure that it lives up to its promise of equality. The thesis concludes that a reformulated objective standard---more attentive to normative failings, widely shared or not---is not only defensible but in fact crucial to any meaningful conception of equality.

ISBN: 9780612410862Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

Rethinking the reasonable person: Custom, equality and the objective standard.
LDR:02871nam 2200289 a 45 001 858064
005 20100712
008 100712s1999 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780612410862
035 $a (UMI)AAINQ41086
035 $a AAINQ41086
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Moran, Mayo. $3 1025091
245 1 0 $a Rethinking the reasonable person: Custom, equality and the objective standard.
300 $a 315 p.
500 $a Adviser: Ernest Weinrib.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-08, Section: A, page: 3110.
502 $a Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 1999.
520 $a Although the reasonable person has been the central figure in the law of negligence at least since Vaughan v. Menlove, he continues to provoke as many questions as he answers---questions that have become increasingly pressing given recent challenges to the reasonable person as inherently male, privileged and otherwise oppressive as a behavioural standard. This work addresses the defensibility of the standard in light of such challenges. The thesis begins by analysing the operation and justification of the standard in the treatment of the mentally disabled and of children, an analysis which reveals that the standard of reasonableness is deeply indebted to conceptions of what is normal or ordinary. The thesis goes on to examine the role of conceptions of the 'normal', not only for the mentally disabled but also for women and those disadvantaged on other grounds including race and class. It turns out that because of the discriminatory implications of reliance on the 'normal', the treatment of various groups under the objective standard raises profound concerns about equality and ultimately about the rule of law. The thesis then asks whether, given these difficulties, the objective standard is worth saving. Although plagued by its own contradictions, the feminist debate is invaluable here: it explicates the strengths and weaknesses of the standard and highlights constitutive tensions between equality, custom and the rule of law. And feminist analyses lead us to conclude that under certain conditions the objective standard is actually invaluable for equality-seekers. This debate also affords the most concrete illustration of how one might go about reformulating the standard to ensure that it lives up to its promise of equality. The thesis concludes that a reformulated objective standard---more attentive to normative failings, widely shared or not---is not only defensible but in fact crucial to any meaningful conception of equality.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies. $3 1017474
650 4 $a Women's Studies. $3 1017481
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0631
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $3 1017674
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 60-08A.
790 $a 0779
790 1 0 $a Weinrib, Ernest, $e advisor
791 $a S.J.D.
792 $a 1999
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=NQ41086