東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparing scoring instruments for th...

University of Ottawa (Canada).

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparing scoring instruments for the performance assessment of professional competencies.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparing scoring instruments for the performance assessment of professional competencies./
Author:	Smee, Sydney M.
Description:	195 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-11, Section: A, page: 4681.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-11A.
Subject:	Education, Higher. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=NR34149
ISBN:	9780494341490

Comparing scoring instruments for the performance assessment of professional competencies.
Smee, Sydney M.

Comparing scoring instruments for the performance assessment of professional competencies. - 195 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-11, Section: A, page: 4681.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Ottawa (Canada), 2007.

Study One asked how case-specific rating scale scores and decisions compared to checklist scores and decisions at representing professional competency. Study Two asked the same question about a skill-specific rating scale.

ISBN: 9780494341490Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Comparing scoring instruments for the performance assessment of professional competencies.
LDR:03062nam 2200301 a 45 001 857522
005 20100712
008 100712s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494341490
035 $a (UMI)AAINR34149
035 $a AAINR34149
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Smee, Sydney M. $3 1024473
245 1 0 $a Comparing scoring instruments for the performance assessment of professional competencies.
300 $a 195 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-11, Section: A, page: 4681.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Ottawa (Canada), 2007.
520 $a Study One asked how case-specific rating scale scores and decisions compared to checklist scores and decisions at representing professional competency. Study Two asked the same question about a skill-specific rating scale.
520 $a Performance assessments of professionals are commonly scored with rating scales but checklists are used with the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Theory suggests checklists are too detailed (Norman, 2005a) and studies show that generic rating scales (e.g., Hodges, Regehr, McNaughton, Tiberius, & Hanson, 1999) are more discriminating and reliable. However, generic scales may represent clinical expertise too narrowly, resulting in less valid scores.
520 $a Data were from a medical licensure OSCE. Participants were 1,587 test takers and 190 physician raters. Two patient cases (Depression and Delirium) were used. In each case, two physicians scored. One scored a checklist and the other a rating scale; both scored a patient interaction rating scale (PIRS).
520 $a Results from both studies showed internal consistency was higher for rating scales (e.g., for Study One alpha=.87 and alpha=.79 for rating scales; alpha=.55 and alpha=.64 for checklists). Item-total score correlations (ITC) for each rating scale as an item within the OSCE were also higher than the ITC for the checklists in both studies. Logistic regression analyses predicting pass/fail decisions from a 3-variable expertise model explained more variance for the rating scales decisions than it did for the checklists in both studies (e.g., RL2=16.4% and RL2=16.4% for rating scales; RL2=12.7% and RL2=5.7% for checklists in Study One). The highest Pearson correlations (corrected for attenuation) were between the rating scale scores and the respective PIRS scores. In conclusion, these rating scale scores are more discriminating and reliable than checklist scores but correlations with PIRS scores indicate they may not measure the intended dimension of the clinical expertise construct. Evidence for a validity argument was strongest for the case-specific rating scale for Depression, raising the question of whether rating scale methodology is appropriate for all OSCE cases.
590 $a School code: 0918.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Education. $3 1017921
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0350
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a University of Ottawa (Canada). $3 1017488
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-11A.
790 $a 0918
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=NR34149