東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Understanding the nature of citation...

State University of New York at Buffalo., Communication.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Understanding the nature of citation: Examination of structure in citation analysis and its application to communication discipline in the information age.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Understanding the nature of citation: Examination of structure in citation analysis and its application to communication discipline in the information age./
作者:	Lee, Sungjoon.
面頁冊數:	79 p.
附註:	Adviser: Barnett A. George.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-04A.
標題:	Sociology, Theory and Methods. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3307596
ISBN:	9780549565932

Understanding the nature of citation: Examination of structure in citation analysis and its application to communication discipline in the information age.
Lee, Sungjoon.

Understanding the nature of citation: Examination of structure in citation analysis and its application to communication discipline in the information age. - 79 p.

Adviser: Barnett A. George.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2008.

This dissertation examines how the structure of the field of Communication has changed in response to the diffusion of new integrated media by employing three different network analyses (an affiliation, semantic, and citation network). The dissertation also examines the relationships and validity among these three network analyses using QAP regression based on the three competing theoretical models. The initial results in the structure of Communication from three different networks suggest that there is no mere evidence of a shift toward a converging trend in Communication. The results in relationships among three networks reveal the following two findings: (1) relational patterns in a citation network are more similar to those in an affiliation network than in a semantic network (2) the affiliation and semantic networks predict the structure of citation network significantly. These findings imply that scholars cite others' works not only because they want to indicate they know those who can back up their arguments in the scientific community but also they think others' works have perceived conceptual relevance with citers' own works even though the former is the stronger drive behind citation.

ISBN: 9780549565932Subjects--Topical Terms:

626625
Sociology, Theory and Methods.

Understanding the nature of citation: Examination of structure in citation analysis and its application to communication discipline in the information age.
LDR:02213nam 2200289 a 45 001 855943
005 20100708
008 100708s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549565932
035 $a (UMI)AAI3307596
035 $a AAI3307596
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Lee, Sungjoon. $3 1022673
245 1 0 $a Understanding the nature of citation: Examination of structure in citation analysis and its application to communication discipline in the information age.
300 $a 79 p.
500 $a Adviser: Barnett A. George.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-04, Section: A, page: 1198.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2008.
520 $a This dissertation examines how the structure of the field of Communication has changed in response to the diffusion of new integrated media by employing three different network analyses (an affiliation, semantic, and citation network). The dissertation also examines the relationships and validity among these three network analyses using QAP regression based on the three competing theoretical models. The initial results in the structure of Communication from three different networks suggest that there is no mere evidence of a shift toward a converging trend in Communication. The results in relationships among three networks reveal the following two findings: (1) relational patterns in a citation network are more similar to those in an affiliation network than in a semantic network (2) the affiliation and semantic networks predict the structure of citation network significantly. These findings imply that scholars cite others' works not only because they want to indicate they know those who can back up their arguments in the scientific community but also they think others' works have perceived conceptual relevance with citers' own works even though the former is the stronger drive behind citation.
590 $a School code: 0656.
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a State University of New York at Buffalo. $b Communication. $3 1022672
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-04A.
790 $a 0656
790 1 0 $a George, Barnett A., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3307596