東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A prehistory of rhetoric and composi...

Purdue University.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A prehistory of rhetoric and composition: New Rhetoric and neo-Aristotelianism at the University of Chicago, 1947--1959.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A prehistory of rhetoric and composition: New Rhetoric and neo-Aristotelianism at the University of Chicago, 1947--1959./
作者:	Beasley, James P.
面頁冊數:	207 p.
附註:	Adviser: David Blakesley.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-01A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3296099
ISBN:	9780549407560

A prehistory of rhetoric and composition: New Rhetoric and neo-Aristotelianism at the University of Chicago, 1947--1959.
Beasley, James P.

A prehistory of rhetoric and composition: New Rhetoric and neo-Aristotelianism at the University of Chicago, 1947--1959. - 207 p.

Adviser: David Blakesley.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2007.

In Rhetoric and Reality: Rhetoric and Composition in the American College 1900-1980, James Berlin points to the University of Chicago in the 1950's for a resurgence in rhetorical thought. He writes, "Rhetoric was being elevated to a new level of academic respectability---or at least being restored to something like its previous status" (116-117). While the names Richard McKeon and Richard M. Weaver seem the most associated with the time period, it is Henry W. Sams, a professor in the undergraduate College from 1946-1959, who draws Berlin's attention. According to Berlin, "An even more comprehensive attempt to restore the formal study of rhetoric to the English department was described in a 1954 essay by Henry W. Sams, also of the University of Chicago" (116). As a researcher, Sams was interested in identifying the "fields of research in rhetoric, that is, locating the areas of the discipline that merited study in the academy" (116). While Sams's article for College English identifies stages of rhetorical scholarship, beginning with translations of ancient texts and culminating in full rhetorical theory, Sams's work as an administrator of Chicago's writing program demonstrates how both Frederick Ward's and Kenneth Burke's commitments to rhetorical theory found their way into composition pedagogy at Chicago. These pedagogical commitments and the conversations they created illuminate, perhaps for one of the earliest times, a "contextualist discourse" paradigm in the discipline of composition. While James Berlin credits the Chicago school for creating new spaces for rhetoric in composition studies, Dean "Champ" Ward foresaw the limitations of the Chicago school of criticism as a composition model.

ISBN: 9780549407560Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

A prehistory of rhetoric and composition: New Rhetoric and neo-Aristotelianism at the University of Chicago, 1947--1959.
LDR:02685nam 2200301 a 45 001 855434
005 20100708
008 100708s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549407560
035 $a (UMI)AAI3296099
035 $a AAI3296099
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Beasley, James P. $3 1022042
245 1 2 $a A prehistory of rhetoric and composition: New Rhetoric and neo-Aristotelianism at the University of Chicago, 1947--1959.
300 $a 207 p.
500 $a Adviser: David Blakesley.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-01, Section: A, page: 0204.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2007.
520 $a In Rhetoric and Reality: Rhetoric and Composition in the American College 1900-1980, James Berlin points to the University of Chicago in the 1950's for a resurgence in rhetorical thought. He writes, "Rhetoric was being elevated to a new level of academic respectability---or at least being restored to something like its previous status" (116-117). While the names Richard McKeon and Richard M. Weaver seem the most associated with the time period, it is Henry W. Sams, a professor in the undergraduate College from 1946-1959, who draws Berlin's attention. According to Berlin, "An even more comprehensive attempt to restore the formal study of rhetoric to the English department was described in a 1954 essay by Henry W. Sams, also of the University of Chicago" (116). As a researcher, Sams was interested in identifying the "fields of research in rhetoric, that is, locating the areas of the discipline that merited study in the academy" (116). While Sams's article for College English identifies stages of rhetorical scholarship, beginning with translations of ancient texts and culminating in full rhetorical theory, Sams's work as an administrator of Chicago's writing program demonstrates how both Frederick Ward's and Kenneth Burke's commitments to rhetorical theory found their way into composition pedagogy at Chicago. These pedagogical commitments and the conversations they created illuminate, perhaps for one of the earliest times, a "contextualist discourse" paradigm in the discipline of composition. While James Berlin credits the Chicago school for creating new spaces for rhetoric in composition studies, Dean "Champ" Ward foresaw the limitations of the Chicago school of criticism as a composition model.
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, History of. $3 599244
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 1019205
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0520
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a Purdue University. $3 1017663
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-01A.
790 $a 0183
790 1 0 $a Blakesley, David, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3296099