東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Enhancing self-control in children w...

Southern Illinois University at Carbondale., Behavior Analysis and Therapy.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Enhancing self-control in children with brain injury via illusionary choices.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Enhancing self-control in children with brain injury via illusionary choices./
作者:	Pozzie, Erica D.
面頁冊數:	48 p.
附註:	Adviser: Mark R. Dixon.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International46-02.
標題:	Health Sciences, Mental Health. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1446964
ISBN:	9780549222064

Enhancing self-control in children with brain injury via illusionary choices.
Pozzie, Erica D.

Enhancing self-control in children with brain injury via illusionary choices. - 48 p.

Adviser: Mark R. Dixon.

Thesis (M.S.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2007.

The purpose of the present investigation is to examine the relative value of illusionary choice-making for children with acquired brain injury. Three participants will be initially asked to engage in a low probability task in the absence of any programmed reinforcement. Following the obtaining of a stable baseline of response duration, participants will be asked to choose between a smaller, immediate reinforcer and a larger, delayed reinforcer contingent upon higher-than-baseline levels of response engagement. It is expected that participants will select the smaller, immediate reinforcer. A third choice will then be added which will allow the participant to have illusory control over the delay requirement to obtain the larger reinforcer. Participants will have a choice between options requiring: (a) no response to earn a small reinforcer, (b) the role of a die by them, engagement in a target task, and a large reinforcer, or (c) the role of the die by the experimenter, engagement in a target task, and a large reinforcer. It is expected that participants will shift their preference to one of the larger, delayed reinforcement options. Finally, participants will return to a choice baseline phase to determine if their preferences had shifted. Implications for the study of self-control and teaching persons with brain injury to tolerate delays to reinforcement are provided.

ISBN: 9780549222064Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017693
Health Sciences, Mental Health.

Enhancing self-control in children with brain injury via illusionary choices.
LDR:02375nam 2200313 a 45 001 853167
005 20100701
008 100701s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549222064
035 $a (UMI)AAI1446964
035 $a AAI1446964
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Pozzie, Erica D. $3 1019375
245 1 0 $a Enhancing self-control in children with brain injury via illusionary choices.
300 $a 48 p.
500 $a Adviser: Mark R. Dixon.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 46-02, page: 1137.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2007.
520 $a The purpose of the present investigation is to examine the relative value of illusionary choice-making for children with acquired brain injury. Three participants will be initially asked to engage in a low probability task in the absence of any programmed reinforcement. Following the obtaining of a stable baseline of response duration, participants will be asked to choose between a smaller, immediate reinforcer and a larger, delayed reinforcer contingent upon higher-than-baseline levels of response engagement. It is expected that participants will select the smaller, immediate reinforcer. A third choice will then be added which will allow the participant to have illusory control over the delay requirement to obtain the larger reinforcer. Participants will have a choice between options requiring: (a) no response to earn a small reinforcer, (b) the role of a die by them, engagement in a target task, and a large reinforcer, or (c) the role of the die by the experimenter, engagement in a target task, and a large reinforcer. It is expected that participants will shift their preference to one of the larger, delayed reinforcement options. Finally, participants will return to a choice baseline phase to determine if their preferences had shifted. Implications for the study of self-control and teaching persons with brain injury to tolerate delays to reinforcement are provided.
590 $a School code: 0209.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Mental Health. $3 1017693
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral. $3 1017677
650 4 $a Psychology, Developmental. $3 1017557
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0620
710 2 $a Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. $b Behavior Analysis and Therapy. $3 1019374
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 46-02.
790 $a 0209
790 1 0 $a Davis, Paula $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Dixon, Mark R., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Habib, Reza $e committee member
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1446964