東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Where the inchoate seeks form: Autob...

University of New Hampshire.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Where the inchoate seeks form: Autobiographical curriculum inquiry in women's rowing.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Where the inchoate seeks form: Autobiographical curriculum inquiry in women's rowing./
作者:	Marshall, Jennie Anne.
面頁冊數:	187 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-03, Section: A, page: 0863.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-03A.
標題:	Education, Curriculum and Instruction. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3308379
ISBN:	9780549548768

Where the inchoate seeks form: Autobiographical curriculum inquiry in women's rowing.
Marshall, Jennie Anne.

Where the inchoate seeks form: Autobiographical curriculum inquiry in women's rowing. - 187 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-03, Section: A, page: 0863.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of New Hampshire, 2008.

In 1976, four years after the Title IX act was passed by the Federal Government, a group of female rowers at Yale University attempted to reveal the university's discriminatory practices toward their team. On March 3, 1976, team captain, Chris Ernst, secured an appointment with the assistant athletic director Joni Barnett. Members of the Yale Women's Crew filed silently into the athletic director's office wearing sweats that said "Yale Women's Crew," then stripped to the waist, revealing the words "Title IX" written on their bare chests and backs. Chris Ernst read a 300-word statement (New York Times, 3/4/76) while a New York Times reporter took notes. Using archival data and the 1999 film, A Hero For Daisy , by Mary Mazzio which documents the Title IX protest at Yale University, I explore the rhetorical moves these women used when the conventional modes of address failed them. I identify and analyze the rhetorical tactics they used in order to contest the dominant ideologies about female athletes and to make a claim about the ways the university was discriminating against them by "exploiting their bodies" (Ernst in Mazzio, 1999). Through this study, I draw on feminist studies, philosophy, composition studies and curriculum theory to pursue a set of concerns related to my work as an educator. What lessons does an exploration of the rhetorical tactics used by the women in this event offer educators committed to educational equity? How can we return subjectivity to curriculum studies, to research in education and to history? In particular, I am concerned with situations where issues of injustice go unrecognized and unaddressed because of the way that oppression is embedded into the available language and forms. I explore the ways historical and present power structures maintain narratives that "preclude a genuine public discussion that might advance the cause of justice" (Kastely, 1997). This dissertation is not an argument in the rational empiricist tradition; the trajectory of the work may not be clearly linear, nor clearly located in a disciplinary or theoretical territory. Like the rower, this research takes a path that is defined, but not definite.

ISBN: 9780549548768Subjects--Topical Terms:

576301
Education, Curriculum and Instruction.

Where the inchoate seeks form: Autobiographical curriculum inquiry in women's rowing.
LDR:03019nam 2200265 a 45 001 852089
005 20100629
008 100629s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549548768
035 $a (UMI)AAI3308379
035 $a AAI3308379
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Marshall, Jennie Anne. $3 1017791
245 1 0 $a Where the inchoate seeks form: Autobiographical curriculum inquiry in women's rowing.
300 $a 187 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-03, Section: A, page: 0863.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of New Hampshire, 2008.
520 $a In 1976, four years after the Title IX act was passed by the Federal Government, a group of female rowers at Yale University attempted to reveal the university's discriminatory practices toward their team. On March 3, 1976, team captain, Chris Ernst, secured an appointment with the assistant athletic director Joni Barnett. Members of the Yale Women's Crew filed silently into the athletic director's office wearing sweats that said "Yale Women's Crew," then stripped to the waist, revealing the words "Title IX" written on their bare chests and backs. Chris Ernst read a 300-word statement (New York Times, 3/4/76) while a New York Times reporter took notes. Using archival data and the 1999 film, A Hero For Daisy , by Mary Mazzio which documents the Title IX protest at Yale University, I explore the rhetorical moves these women used when the conventional modes of address failed them. I identify and analyze the rhetorical tactics they used in order to contest the dominant ideologies about female athletes and to make a claim about the ways the university was discriminating against them by "exploiting their bodies" (Ernst in Mazzio, 1999). Through this study, I draw on feminist studies, philosophy, composition studies and curriculum theory to pursue a set of concerns related to my work as an educator. What lessons does an exploration of the rhetorical tactics used by the women in this event offer educators committed to educational equity? How can we return subjectivity to curriculum studies, to research in education and to history? In particular, I am concerned with situations where issues of injustice go unrecognized and unaddressed because of the way that oppression is embedded into the available language and forms. I explore the ways historical and present power structures maintain narratives that "preclude a genuine public discussion that might advance the cause of justice" (Kastely, 1997). This dissertation is not an argument in the rational empiricist tradition; the trajectory of the work may not be clearly linear, nor clearly located in a disciplinary or theoretical territory. Like the rower, this research takes a path that is defined, but not definite.
590 $a School code: 0141.
650 4 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 576301
650 4 $a Education, Philosophy of. $3 783746
650 4 $a Education, Reading. $3 1017790
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0998
710 2 $a University of New Hampshire. $3 1017788
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 69-03A.
790 $a 0141
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3308379