東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Hegemony and revolution: An odyssey...

The University of Chicago.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Hegemony and revolution: An odyssey toward the Sino-American rapprochement, 1943--1972.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Hegemony and revolution: An odyssey toward the Sino-American rapprochement, 1943--1972./
作者:	Wang, Jingbin.
面頁冊數:	446 p.
附註:	Adviser: Bruce Cumings.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-08A.
標題:	History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3273091
ISBN:	9780549157281

Hegemony and revolution: An odyssey toward the Sino-American rapprochement, 1943--1972.
Wang, Jingbin.

Hegemony and revolution: An odyssey toward the Sino-American rapprochement, 1943--1972. - 446 p.

Adviser: Bruce Cumings.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2007.

This dissertation seeks to reexamine three decades of relations between the United States and Mao's China with a view to throwing new light on the causes of the Sino-American rapprochement in 1971-72 in the larger context of the global confrontation between liberalism and communism. I approach the issue between these two states as one of "diplomatic recognition." I am concerned with the question of why a hegemonic great power chose to move toward recognition of a revolutionary state later rather than earlier while the revolutionary state opposed what it viewed as the arch imperialist power and desired its recognition at the same time.

ISBN: 9780549157281Subjects--Topical Terms:

626624
History, Asia, Australia and Oceania.

Hegemony and revolution: An odyssey toward the Sino-American rapprochement, 1943--1972.
LDR:02995nam 2200325 a 45 001 851979
005 20100629
008 100629s2007 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549157281
035 $a (UMI)AAI3273091
035 $a AAI3273091
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Wang, Jingbin. $3 1017602
245 1 0 $a Hegemony and revolution: An odyssey toward the Sino-American rapprochement, 1943--1972.
300 $a 446 p.
500 $a Adviser: Bruce Cumings.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-08, Section: A, page: 3548.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2007.
520 $a This dissertation seeks to reexamine three decades of relations between the United States and Mao's China with a view to throwing new light on the causes of the Sino-American rapprochement in 1971-72 in the larger context of the global confrontation between liberalism and communism. I approach the issue between these two states as one of "diplomatic recognition." I am concerned with the question of why a hegemonic great power chose to move toward recognition of a revolutionary state later rather than earlier while the revolutionary state opposed what it viewed as the arch imperialist power and desired its recognition at the same time.
520 $a Much has been written about the worldwide struggle between liberal democracy and communism, but from the American vantage point. This dissertation adopts a world-historical approach, anchoring the two traditions in efforts to reform and revolutionize the nation-state system with emphasis on their effects on bilateral diplomatic relations.
520 $a Similarly, it is recognized that the United States had long refused to recognize the Beijing government, and it was China's state policy to establish diplomatic relations with all other countries in the world, including the United States. Yet these two facts have been obscured by the general tendency to subsume "diplomatic recognition" under an ideological or a strategic perspective. I address "diplomatic recognition" in its own right and consider the U.S. and Chinese recognition policies together within one conceptual framework informed by the liberal and the Marxist-Leninist traditions.
520 $a This study does not downplay strategic calculations either in Washington or in Beijing. On the contrary, I hope to demonstrate that the United States had consistently adopted a strategic approach to China from confrontation to rapprochement, but from a liberal standpoint. Power mattered, but realism was not relevant. Much the same could be said of China, including the Soviet Union. The "strategic triangle" was real, but beyond the purview of realism.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. $3 626624
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0582
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $3 1017389
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-08A.
790 $a 0330
790 1 0 $a Cumings, Bruce, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2007
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3273091