東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Changing the sacred: Discourse and c...

University of California, Los Angeles.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Changing the sacred: Discourse and cultural production in early Republican China, 1915-1923.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Changing the sacred: Discourse and cultural production in early Republican China, 1915-1923./
作者:	Hwang, Jinlin L.
面頁冊數:	268 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-06, Section: A, page: 2347.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International54-06A.
標題:	History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9329995http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9329995

Changing the sacred: Discourse and cultural production in early Republican China, 1915-1923.
Hwang, Jinlin L.

Changing the sacred: Discourse and cultural production in early Republican China, 1915-1923.[electronic resource] - 268 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-06, Section: A, page: 2347.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 1993.

This dissertation aims to accomplish two things. One is to develop a theory of public discourse as a process for shaping cultural rituals. The other is to argue that, in reference to the theory developed, the New Culture Movement that took place in early Republican China was characteristically a liminal discourse, a discourse in which was generated a symbolic detachment from the past and a new cultural frame to interpret the necessity of the transition. My main contention is that, without examining the culture movement as a liminal discourse and hence a ritual construction of reality, one cannot understand with precision the highly articulated performances by which the new culturalists were able to overthrow a sacred symbol system--and create a new one--politically, ideologically, scientifically, and imaginatively. To articulate this argument, my inquiry will focus on discussing two main discursive contests: the Controversy over Eastern and Western Civilization and the Polemics on Science and Metaphysics. Not only did their discursive fields specifically embody the main concerns of the culture movement, but they also offered a particular approach to investigate the culture movement from the standpoint of its own discourse, to see how the interplay of cultural capital, practical competence, and linguistic complicity made the discourse as it was. In examining the culture movement from the standpoint of its own discourse, its organization, and process, this dissertation attempts to bring into existence both a new perspective for the study of the New Culture Movement and a different concept of the autonomy of cultural power.Subjects--Topical Terms:

626624
History, Asia, Australia and Oceania.

Changing the sacred: Discourse and cultural production in early Republican China, 1915-1923.
LDR:02601nam _2200253 _450 001 628679
005 20080114110419.5
008 080114s1993 eng d
035 $a 00462933
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 $a Hwang, Jinlin L. $3 626623
245 1 0 $a Changing the sacred: Discourse and cultural production in early Republican China, 1915-1923. $h [electronic resource]
300 $a 268 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-06, Section: A, page: 2347.
500 $a Chair: Jeffrey C. Alexander.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 1993.
520 $a This dissertation aims to accomplish two things. One is to develop a theory of public discourse as a process for shaping cultural rituals. The other is to argue that, in reference to the theory developed, the New Culture Movement that took place in early Republican China was characteristically a liminal discourse, a discourse in which was generated a symbolic detachment from the past and a new cultural frame to interpret the necessity of the transition. My main contention is that, without examining the culture movement as a liminal discourse and hence a ritual construction of reality, one cannot understand with precision the highly articulated performances by which the new culturalists were able to overthrow a sacred symbol system--and create a new one--politically, ideologically, scientifically, and imaginatively. To articulate this argument, my inquiry will focus on discussing two main discursive contests: the Controversy over Eastern and Western Civilization and the Polemics on Science and Metaphysics. Not only did their discursive fields specifically embody the main concerns of the culture movement, but they also offered a particular approach to investigate the culture movement from the standpoint of its own discourse, to see how the interplay of cultural capital, practical competence, and linguistic complicity made the discourse as it was. In examining the culture movement from the standpoint of its own discourse, its organization, and process, this dissertation attempts to bring into existence both a new perspective for the study of the New Culture Movement and a different concept of the autonomy of cultural power.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 $a History, Asia, Australia and Oceania. $3 626624
650 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0344
710 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $3 626622
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 54-06A.
790 1 0 $a Alexander, Jeffrey C., $e advisor
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1993
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9329995 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9329995