東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Domi...

Hurd, Kyneshawau.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination: Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination: Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap./
作者:	Hurd, Kyneshawau.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	151 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-03B.
標題:	Social psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31555762
ISBN:	9798384431978

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination: Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.
Hurd, Kyneshawau.

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination: Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 151 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.

In a societal context that professes egalitarian ideals yet remains deeply entrenched in racial hierarchies, this dissertation introduces and develops the 3D framework-Diversity, Dominance, and Discrimination-to critically examine how seemingly egalitarian diversity ideologies, practices and decisions may work to preserve the very inequalities they purport to address. By creating this novel framework, the work centers the subtle and often unseen forces that sustain racial dominance, though not the ones most commonly thought of, like implicit bias. Rather, this framework centers group-based dominance as the foundational source of discrimination.At the heart of this investigation is the development and application of the first-ever measure of implicit social dominance orientation (ISDO), a subconscious preference for maintaining group-based hierarchies. The dissertation is structured around three empirical papers. The first paper in this collection validates this groundbreaking measure, uncovering its role in explaining why those who outwardly reject dominance might still support policies that perpetuate racial inequities. The second paper applies the 3D model to the venture capital sector, revealing how contractual control terms, far from empowering Black founders, can bind them in ways that maintain racial hierarchies even when Black founders receive investment. The third paper delves deeper into the investment decisions of venture capitalists, exploring how implicit dominance subtly shapes assessments of risk and allocation of control rights.Together, these papers paint a picture of a diversity paradigm that, when focused solely on instrumental representation, may appeal to implicit dominance motivations and therefore operating to reinforce the very power structures it seeks to challenge. By critically analyzing the role of implicit social dominance orientation (ISDO) and its intersection with diversity ideology, this dissertation calls for a fundamental shift in how we approach racial justice-moving beyond the surface of DEI initiatives to confront the underlying dynamics of power and dominance that sustain inequality. In doing so, it offers a more nuanced and robust pathway toward true equity, urging a reevaluation of the frameworks that guide our efforts in law, policy, and beyond.

ISBN: 9798384431978Subjects--Topical Terms:

520219
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Discrimination

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination: Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.
LDR:03541nmm a2200397 4500 001 2404535
005 20241213095601.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798384431978
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31555762
035 $a AAI31555762
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hurd, Kyneshawau. $3 3774852
245 1 0 $a 3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination: Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 151 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Plaut, Victoria.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.
520 $a In a societal context that professes egalitarian ideals yet remains deeply entrenched in racial hierarchies, this dissertation introduces and develops the 3D framework-Diversity, Dominance, and Discrimination-to critically examine how seemingly egalitarian diversity ideologies, practices and decisions may work to preserve the very inequalities they purport to address. By creating this novel framework, the work centers the subtle and often unseen forces that sustain racial dominance, though not the ones most commonly thought of, like implicit bias. Rather, this framework centers group-based dominance as the foundational source of discrimination.At the heart of this investigation is the development and application of the first-ever measure of implicit social dominance orientation (ISDO), a subconscious preference for maintaining group-based hierarchies. The dissertation is structured around three empirical papers. The first paper in this collection validates this groundbreaking measure, uncovering its role in explaining why those who outwardly reject dominance might still support policies that perpetuate racial inequities. The second paper applies the 3D model to the venture capital sector, revealing how contractual control terms, far from empowering Black founders, can bind them in ways that maintain racial hierarchies even when Black founders receive investment. The third paper delves deeper into the investment decisions of venture capitalists, exploring how implicit dominance subtly shapes assessments of risk and allocation of control rights.Together, these papers paint a picture of a diversity paradigm that, when focused solely on instrumental representation, may appeal to implicit dominance motivations and therefore operating to reinforce the very power structures it seeks to challenge. By critically analyzing the role of implicit social dominance orientation (ISDO) and its intersection with diversity ideology, this dissertation calls for a fundamental shift in how we approach racial justice-moving beyond the surface of DEI initiatives to confront the underlying dynamics of power and dominance that sustain inequality. In doing so, it offers a more nuanced and robust pathway toward true equity, urging a reevaluation of the frameworks that guide our efforts in law, policy, and beyond.
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Black studies. $3 2122689
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a Discrimination
653 $a Diversity
653 $a Implicit social dominance
653 $a PBJ
653 $a Principle-policy gap
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0325
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b Jurisprudence & Social Policy. $3 1681931
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-03B.
790 $a 0028
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31555762