東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling: Institu...

Spoto, Meredith Katherine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling: Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Chiseling the Glass Ceiling: Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions./
作者:	Spoto, Meredith Katherine.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	102 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-03A.
標題:	Sociology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31555765
ISBN:	9798384455851

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling: Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.
Spoto, Meredith Katherine.

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling: Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 102 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.

This dissertation is a compendium of three papers. It explores the multifaceted issues of gender inequality within large law firms, focusing on the persistent barriers faced by women and the impact of policies and practices aimed at mitigating these challenges. The three studies collectively examine the career trajectories of female lawyers, the role of mentorship, and the effects of domestic responsibilities, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the systemic and cultural obstacles that contribute to the gender attrition crisis in elite law firms.The first paper, "Law's Leaky Pipeline: An Examination of Gender-Based Attrition and Career Trajectories in Elite Law Firms," investigates the long-standing disparity in career progression between male and female lawyers. Despite an increase in the percentage of female lawyers, significant gaps remain, particularly in private practice. Through an analysis of career movements at four top-ranked large law firms from 2010 to the present, this study identifies the root causes of women's higher attrition rates, highlighting the compounded challenges faced by women of color.The second paper, "Mentorship Matters: Unpacking Gender Inequality in Big Law Before and During COVID-19," explores the critical role of mentorship in addressing gender disparities. Using original survey data from 187 associates at 15 leading U.S. law firms, the study reveals significant gender differences in mentorship experiences and functions. It examines the efficacy of formal mentorship programs in mitigating gender inequality and how these patterns evolved during the pandemic, ultimately questioning the effectiveness of current mentorship practices in supporting women's career advancement.The third paper, "Household Hurdles: Gender-Based Differences in Domestic Labor Among Law Firm Associates Amidst COVID-19," delves into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic labor divisions and work-from-home dynamics. Analyzing survey data from 331 attorneys, this study highlights the increased domestic responsibilities shouldered by female lawyers and the relative immutability of pre-existing gender disparities in domestic labor, despite the shift to remote work. It underscores the missed opportunity for greater gender equality in both personal and professional spheres and discusses the potential of flexible work policies to reduce gender inequality if implemented effectively post-pandemic.Together, these studies underscore the need for a holistic approach to dismantling institutional barriers and promoting gender equality in the legal profession. By examining the interplay of career trajectories, mentorship, and domestic responsibilities, this compendium contributes to the broader discourse on creating a more inclusive and equitable environment in large law firms.

ISBN: 9798384455851Subjects--Topical Terms:

516174
Sociology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Gender equity

Chiseling the Glass Ceiling: Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.
LDR:04053nmm a2200373 4500 001 2404266
005 20241203090619.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798384455851
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31555765
035 $a AAI31555765
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Spoto, Meredith Katherine. $3 3774571
245 1 0 $a Chiseling the Glass Ceiling: Institutional Barriers and the Gender Attrition Crisis in Large Law Firms, From Symbolism to Solutions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 102 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Albiston, Catherine.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.
520 $a This dissertation is a compendium of three papers. It explores the multifaceted issues of gender inequality within large law firms, focusing on the persistent barriers faced by women and the impact of policies and practices aimed at mitigating these challenges. The three studies collectively examine the career trajectories of female lawyers, the role of mentorship, and the effects of domestic responsibilities, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the systemic and cultural obstacles that contribute to the gender attrition crisis in elite law firms.The first paper, "Law's Leaky Pipeline: An Examination of Gender-Based Attrition and Career Trajectories in Elite Law Firms," investigates the long-standing disparity in career progression between male and female lawyers. Despite an increase in the percentage of female lawyers, significant gaps remain, particularly in private practice. Through an analysis of career movements at four top-ranked large law firms from 2010 to the present, this study identifies the root causes of women's higher attrition rates, highlighting the compounded challenges faced by women of color.The second paper, "Mentorship Matters: Unpacking Gender Inequality in Big Law Before and During COVID-19," explores the critical role of mentorship in addressing gender disparities. Using original survey data from 187 associates at 15 leading U.S. law firms, the study reveals significant gender differences in mentorship experiences and functions. It examines the efficacy of formal mentorship programs in mitigating gender inequality and how these patterns evolved during the pandemic, ultimately questioning the effectiveness of current mentorship practices in supporting women's career advancement.The third paper, "Household Hurdles: Gender-Based Differences in Domestic Labor Among Law Firm Associates Amidst COVID-19," delves into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic labor divisions and work-from-home dynamics. Analyzing survey data from 331 attorneys, this study highlights the increased domestic responsibilities shouldered by female lawyers and the relative immutability of pre-existing gender disparities in domestic labor, despite the shift to remote work. It underscores the missed opportunity for greater gender equality in both personal and professional spheres and discusses the potential of flexible work policies to reduce gender inequality if implemented effectively post-pandemic.Together, these studies underscore the need for a holistic approach to dismantling institutional barriers and promoting gender equality in the legal profession. By examining the interplay of career trajectories, mentorship, and domestic responsibilities, this compendium contributes to the broader discourse on creating a more inclusive and equitable environment in large law firms.
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Gender studies. $3 2122708
650 4 $a Social structure. $3 528995
653 $a Gender equity
653 $a Institutional factors
653 $a Law firms
653 $a Organizations
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0733
690 $a 0700
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b Jurisprudence & Social Policy. $3 1681931
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-03A.
790 $a 0028
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31555765