東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Awe, Social Dominance Orientation, a...

Aldstadt, Kathryn Maia.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Awe, Social Dominance Orientation, and Promoting Sustainability.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Awe, Social Dominance Orientation, and Promoting Sustainability./
作者:	Aldstadt, Kathryn Maia.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	38 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-11.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31311776
ISBN:	9798382322742

Awe, Social Dominance Orientation, and Promoting Sustainability.
Aldstadt, Kathryn Maia.

Awe, Social Dominance Orientation, and Promoting Sustainability. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 38 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.

Thesis (M.A.)--Miami University, 2024.

The current study (N = 212) explored the interplay of experiencing negative awe and social dominance orientation (SDO) on pro-environmental concerns and behaviors. Past work has shown that experiencing awe (i.e., vast stimuli that transcend one's past experiences and frame of reference) encourages pro-environmental behavior, and that people with stronger SDO endorsement (i.e., viewing hierarchy as necessary to maintain an orderly, predictable world) show less sustainable beliefs and behaviors. We hypothesized that greater SDO endorsements would predict poorer sustainability outcomes and that experiencing negative awe would encourage greater sustainability, both replicating past findings. More important, we anticipated an SDO and awe interaction because negative awe shows nature as an indominable force and may encourage people with greater SDO endorsement to acknowledge the limits of humanity, resulting in relatively more pro-environmental concerns and behaviors. The current work replicated past findings involving SDO (i.e., those endorsing SDO to a greater degree revealing less sustainable outcomes), however direct effects of awe or its interaction with SDO were not observed. Limitations of the current work and implications for future research are discussed.

ISBN: 9798382322742Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Social dominance orientation

Awe, Social Dominance Orientation, and Promoting Sustainability.
LDR:02418nmm a2200385 4500 001 2404236
005 20241203090610.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382322742
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31311776
035 $a (MiAaPQ)OhioLINKmiami1713890164562087
035 $a AAI31311776
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Aldstadt, Kathryn Maia. $3 3774535
245 1 0 $a Awe, Social Dominance Orientation, and Promoting Sustainability.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 38 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
500 $a Advisor: McConnell, Allen.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Miami University, 2024.
520 $a The current study (N = 212) explored the interplay of experiencing negative awe and social dominance orientation (SDO) on pro-environmental concerns and behaviors. Past work has shown that experiencing awe (i.e., vast stimuli that transcend one's past experiences and frame of reference) encourages pro-environmental behavior, and that people with stronger SDO endorsement (i.e., viewing hierarchy as necessary to maintain an orderly, predictable world) show less sustainable beliefs and behaviors. We hypothesized that greater SDO endorsements would predict poorer sustainability outcomes and that experiencing negative awe would encourage greater sustainability, both replicating past findings. More important, we anticipated an SDO and awe interaction because negative awe shows nature as an indominable force and may encourage people with greater SDO endorsement to acknowledge the limits of humanity, resulting in relatively more pro-environmental concerns and behaviors. The current work replicated past findings involving SDO (i.e., those endorsing SDO to a greater degree revealing less sustainable outcomes), however direct effects of awe or its interaction with SDO were not observed. Limitations of the current work and implications for future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0126.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 677245
653 $a Social dominance orientation
653 $a Pro-environmental concerns
653 $a Sustainable beliefs
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0768
690 $a 0477
710 2 $a Miami University. $b Psychology. $3 3290414
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-11.
790 $a 0126
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31311776