東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Servant-Leadership and Organizationa...

Moultrie, LaQuitta J.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Servant-Leadership and Organizational Commitment: A Quantitative Study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Servant-Leadership and Organizational Commitment: A Quantitative Study./
作者:	Moultrie, LaQuitta J.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	218 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02A.
標題:	Social sciences education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31298697
ISBN:	9798383647592

Servant-Leadership and Organizational Commitment: A Quantitative Study.
Moultrie, LaQuitta J.

Servant-Leadership and Organizational Commitment: A Quantitative Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 218 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Gonzaga University, 2024.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between servant-leadership and organizational commitment (affective commitment), paying particular attention to the roles of gender, age, ethnicity, level of education, job position, years employed with the federal government, salary, and federal agency of employment, among current federal government employees. This quantitative study used survey research methodology. A convenience sample was drawn from the larger population of current federal government employees I have access to through personal and professional networks. Data from the study participants (n=88) were obtained through two separate instruments: The Servant-leadership Scale (SL-28) and the Three-Component Model (TCM) Employment Commitment Survey, along with selected demographic questions, included in one online survey containing a total of 57 questions. Responses were analyzed to determine (a) perceptions of servant-leadership among my sample of federal government employees participating in the study. (b) at what level is organizational affective commitment present within the federal government, among my sample of federal government employees participating in the study; (c) is there a statistically significant difference in the perceptions of servant-leadership in terms of demographic variables (a) gender (b) age (c) ethnicity, (d) level of education; (e) job position, (f) years employed by the federal government (g) salary, and (h) agency of employment, among my sample of federal government employees participating in this study? Although the convenience sampling method was suitable for me as a researcher, it limited the population of federal government employees throughout multiple organizations. A larger sample size generalized to one federal government organization's employees may have uncovered a different end result. Second, a large majority of the sample identified as a cultural group that may not be representative of other ethnicities. Third, of the 88 participants, the bottom four scores on the Servant-Leadership survey correlated (Pearson = 0.99) with the top four part of the Affective Commitment survey. Consequently, the study shows a considerable discrepancy between federal government employees' affective commitment levels and their perceptions of their own leadership shortcomings. Nonetheless, the results of the study did point to a significant relationship between affective commitment and the behavior component of servant-leadership.

ISBN: 9798383647592Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144735
Social sciences education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Affective commitment

Servant-Leadership and Organizational Commitment: A Quantitative Study.
LDR:03639nmm a2200373 4500 001 2404230
005 20241203090608.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798383647592
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31298697
035 $a AAI31298697
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Moultrie, LaQuitta J. $0 (orcid)0009-0009-0618-5900 $3 3774530
245 1 0 $a Servant-Leadership and Organizational Commitment: A Quantitative Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 218 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Ferch, Shann R.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Gonzaga University, 2024.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between servant-leadership and organizational commitment (affective commitment), paying particular attention to the roles of gender, age, ethnicity, level of education, job position, years employed with the federal government, salary, and federal agency of employment, among current federal government employees. This quantitative study used survey research methodology. A convenience sample was drawn from the larger population of current federal government employees I have access to through personal and professional networks. Data from the study participants (n=88) were obtained through two separate instruments: The Servant-leadership Scale (SL-28) and the Three-Component Model (TCM) Employment Commitment Survey, along with selected demographic questions, included in one online survey containing a total of 57 questions. Responses were analyzed to determine (a) perceptions of servant-leadership among my sample of federal government employees participating in the study. (b) at what level is organizational affective commitment present within the federal government, among my sample of federal government employees participating in the study; (c) is there a statistically significant difference in the perceptions of servant-leadership in terms of demographic variables (a) gender (b) age (c) ethnicity, (d) level of education; (e) job position, (f) years employed by the federal government (g) salary, and (h) agency of employment, among my sample of federal government employees participating in this study? Although the convenience sampling method was suitable for me as a researcher, it limited the population of federal government employees throughout multiple organizations. A larger sample size generalized to one federal government organization's employees may have uncovered a different end result. Second, a large majority of the sample identified as a cultural group that may not be representative of other ethnicities. Third, of the 88 participants, the bottom four scores on the Servant-Leadership survey correlated (Pearson = 0.99) with the top four part of the Affective Commitment survey. Consequently, the study shows a considerable discrepancy between federal government employees' affective commitment levels and their perceptions of their own leadership shortcomings. Nonetheless, the results of the study did point to a significant relationship between affective commitment and the behavior component of servant-leadership.
590 $a School code: 0736.
650 4 $a Social sciences education. $3 2144735
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Social studies education. $3 3422293
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
653 $a Affective commitment
653 $a Convenience sampling
653 $a Organizational commitment
653 $a Servant-leadership
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0514
710 2 $a Gonzaga University. $b Leadership Studies. $3 2099409
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02A.
790 $a 0736
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31298697