東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Public Muse in Congress: The Pun...

Deichmann, Elizabeth.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Public Muse in Congress: The Punctuation of American Federal Arts Policy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Public Muse in Congress: The Punctuation of American Federal Arts Policy./
作者:	Deichmann, Elizabeth.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	235 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-07A.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30812197
ISBN:	9798381443752

The Public Muse in Congress: The Punctuation of American Federal Arts Policy.
Deichmann, Elizabeth.

The Public Muse in Congress: The Punctuation of American Federal Arts Policy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 235 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Missouri - Saint Louis, 2023.

In 1989, American federal arts policy changed suddenly and drastically when the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) gained unprecedented attention in Congress for controversial grant awards that supported two visual artists. Prior to this, federal arts policy was an insulated subsystem run by experts applying high art aesthetic standards to grantmaking. Informed by punctuated-equilibrium theory (PET), this investigation of congressional rhetoric shows that Republican policy entrepreneurs during this time effectively set a new, more negative tone about federal arts policy by harnessing conservative culture wars messages. The change in tone preceded federal arts policy's arrival on the broader congressional agenda that resulted in substantive changes to policy, including prohibiting the NEA from supporting "obscene" artwork and fellowships for individual artists, diversifying advisors and grant panelists, restricting types of grant funding, and more. These policy changes effectively addressed the vagueness of the agency's enabling legislation, introduced a new decision-making paradigm to the grantmaking process, and increased public accountability. The federal arts policy subsystem was punctuated and it is likely that political polarization, and especially the efforts of Republicans, amplified the macro-political intervention. By the end of the crisis, American federal arts policy had achieved a more democratic partial equilibrium. The punctuation of the American federal arts policy subsystem, especially changes to the policymaking process, continues to define American federal arts policy to this day.

ISBN: 9798381443752Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

American federal arts policy

The Public Muse in Congress: The Punctuation of American Federal Arts Policy.
LDR:02768nmm a2200361 4500 001 2402935
005 20241104055823.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381443752
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30812197
035 $a AAI30812197
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Deichmann, Elizabeth. $3 3773194
245 1 0 $a The Public Muse in Congress: The Punctuation of American Federal Arts Policy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 235 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Swanstrom, Todd.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Missouri - Saint Louis, 2023.
520 $a In 1989, American federal arts policy changed suddenly and drastically when the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) gained unprecedented attention in Congress for controversial grant awards that supported two visual artists. Prior to this, federal arts policy was an insulated subsystem run by experts applying high art aesthetic standards to grantmaking. Informed by punctuated-equilibrium theory (PET), this investigation of congressional rhetoric shows that Republican policy entrepreneurs during this time effectively set a new, more negative tone about federal arts policy by harnessing conservative culture wars messages. The change in tone preceded federal arts policy's arrival on the broader congressional agenda that resulted in substantive changes to policy, including prohibiting the NEA from supporting "obscene" artwork and fellowships for individual artists, diversifying advisors and grant panelists, restricting types of grant funding, and more. These policy changes effectively addressed the vagueness of the agency's enabling legislation, introduced a new decision-making paradigm to the grantmaking process, and increased public accountability. The federal arts policy subsystem was punctuated and it is likely that political polarization, and especially the efforts of Republicans, amplified the macro-political intervention. By the end of the crisis, American federal arts policy had achieved a more democratic partial equilibrium. The punctuation of the American federal arts policy subsystem, especially changes to the policymaking process, continues to define American federal arts policy to this day.
590 $a School code: 0481.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Arts management. $3 3168382
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a American federal arts policy
653 $a National Endowment for the Arts
653 $a Punctuated-equilibrium theory
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0424
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a University of Missouri - Saint Louis. $b Political Science. $3 2098320
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-07A.
790 $a 0481
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30812197