東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Shared Decision Making and Risk in A...

Cartwright, Claire.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Shared Decision Making and Risk in Adult Mental Health Services.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Shared Decision Making and Risk in Adult Mental Health Services./
作者:	Cartwright, Claire.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	134 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-11A.
標題:	Ethnography. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30983939
ISBN:	9798382622378

Shared Decision Making and Risk in Adult Mental Health Services.
Cartwright, Claire.

Shared Decision Making and Risk in Adult Mental Health Services. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 134 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.

Thesis (D.Clin.Psy.)--The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), 2023.

Risk assessment and risk management are considered a fundamental part of safe and effective mental health care for adults (Ahmed et al., 2021). Research and policy both advocate for a shared decision-making approach to risk assessment in mental health settings (Draft Mental Health Bill, 2022). For a decision to be 'shared' it must involve at least two participants, the sharing of information, and a decision that is made and agreed upon by all parties (Stacey et al., 2015). However, studies suggest that service users are often not involved in decisions about risk (or any aspect of their care) and often remain unaware that a risk assessment has taken place for them (Slade, 2017). This thesis aims, firstly, to explore within the existing literature, the attitudes towards and experiences of 'shared decision making' in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users. Secondly, to look specifically at the discourses service users use to talk about their experiences of 'risk' and 'safety' whilst they have been detained under the Mental Health Act (1983).The systematic review (chapter 1) aims to provide an up-to-date literature review of the experiences of and attitudes towards shared decision making in mental health services from the perspectives of staff and service users. The review uses a meta-ethnographic approach to synthesise qualitative themes from primary studies to produce higher order concepts. These are the role of service user ownership, the influence of fluctuating capacity, the importance of therapeutic alliance and changing clinician's behaviours and attitudes.The empirical paper (chapter 2) recruited people with experience of detention under the Mental Health Act (1983) and uses a Foucauldian discourse analysis approach to explore how service users use language to construct their accounts of risk and safety whilst detained. The findings suggest that participants tended to understand risk and safety in terms of power and control (held by themselves and the mental health system), the role of the 'good' or 'bad' patient, coercion with an additional discourse around their perceptions of service user involvement. One of the key implications emerging from this study was that service users emphasised the risk they experienced from others on the wards and the risks experienced from the system itself.The two papers are aimed for publication in British Medical Council (BMC) Health Services Research journal. Author guidelines for the papers are contained in appendix d. The chapters conform to author guidelines however, tables, figures and further contextual information are provided in accordance with thesis guidelines.

ISBN: 9798382622378Subjects--Topical Terms:

705632
Ethnography.

Shared Decision Making and Risk in Adult Mental Health Services.
LDR:03788nmm a2200349 4500 001 2402798
005 20241104055701.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382622378
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30983939
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Liverpool_3172478
035 $a AAI30983939
035 $a 2402798
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cartwright, Claire. $3 3773045
245 1 0 $a Shared Decision Making and Risk in Adult Mental Health Services.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 134 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Greenhill, Beth;Harrison, John;Griffiths, Alys.
502 $a Thesis (D.Clin.Psy.)--The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), 2023.
520 $a Risk assessment and risk management are considered a fundamental part of safe and effective mental health care for adults (Ahmed et al., 2021). Research and policy both advocate for a shared decision-making approach to risk assessment in mental health settings (Draft Mental Health Bill, 2022). For a decision to be 'shared' it must involve at least two participants, the sharing of information, and a decision that is made and agreed upon by all parties (Stacey et al., 2015). However, studies suggest that service users are often not involved in decisions about risk (or any aspect of their care) and often remain unaware that a risk assessment has taken place for them (Slade, 2017). This thesis aims, firstly, to explore within the existing literature, the attitudes towards and experiences of 'shared decision making' in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users. Secondly, to look specifically at the discourses service users use to talk about their experiences of 'risk' and 'safety' whilst they have been detained under the Mental Health Act (1983).The systematic review (chapter 1) aims to provide an up-to-date literature review of the experiences of and attitudes towards shared decision making in mental health services from the perspectives of staff and service users. The review uses a meta-ethnographic approach to synthesise qualitative themes from primary studies to produce higher order concepts. These are the role of service user ownership, the influence of fluctuating capacity, the importance of therapeutic alliance and changing clinician's behaviours and attitudes.The empirical paper (chapter 2) recruited people with experience of detention under the Mental Health Act (1983) and uses a Foucauldian discourse analysis approach to explore how service users use language to construct their accounts of risk and safety whilst detained. The findings suggest that participants tended to understand risk and safety in terms of power and control (held by themselves and the mental health system), the role of the 'good' or 'bad' patient, coercion with an additional discourse around their perceptions of service user involvement. One of the key implications emerging from this study was that service users emphasised the risk they experienced from others on the wards and the risks experienced from the system itself.The two papers are aimed for publication in British Medical Council (BMC) Health Services Research journal. Author guidelines for the papers are contained in appendix d. The chapters conform to author guidelines however, tables, figures and further contextual information are provided in accordance with thesis guidelines.
590 $a School code: 0722.
650 4 $a Ethnography. $3 705632
650 4 $a Attitudes. $3 1973410
650 4 $a Mental health care. $3 3552136
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Mental disorders. $3 728624
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 534751
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0347
710 2 $a The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom). $3 1684840
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-11A.
790 $a 0722
791 $a D.Clin.Psy.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30983939