東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Some Determinants and Consequences o...

Uzunkoca, Ulfet.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Some Determinants and Consequences of Attachment Styles at Work.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Some Determinants and Consequences of Attachment Styles at Work./
作者:	Uzunkoca, Ulfet.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	162 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04B.
標題:	Problem solving. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29442934
ISBN:	9798352636053

Some Determinants and Consequences of Attachment Styles at Work.
Uzunkoca, Ulfet.

Some Determinants and Consequences of Attachment Styles at Work. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 162 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marmara Universitesi (Turkey), 2022.

The objective of this paper was to highlight the attachment styles are significant construct at organizational settings. Correspondingly, the study aimed to estimate attachment styles at work in terms of individual factors (generalized attachment style) and work environment factors (psychological safety, interactional justice, managerial affect-based trust, supervisor support), and its relationship with emotional exhaustion and exploratory behaviours. The sample consisted of 556 employees working in various sectors and different organizations in Turkey. Hypothesized relationships related to determinants of the attachment styles at work were tested with stepwise regression analysis (forward inclusion). Moreover, hypothesized relationships related to consequences of attachments styles at work were tested with t-test and one-way ANOVA. Predictably, the results revealed that attachments styles at work is a significant construct in understanding work-related attitudes and behaviours namely, emotional exhaustion and exploratory behaviours. As to determinants of attachment styles at work the results showed that individual factors, namely one's generalized attachment styles was the major determinants of one's attachment styles at work. Moreover, the results showed that team level perceived work environment such as psychological unsafety is a better predictor than both individual level perceived work environment and positive work environment such as psychological safety. Detailly, psychological unsafety influenced both secure and fearful as well as with preoccupied attachment at work. Moreover, it also influenced dismissing attachment styles at work who had less than 2 years' experience in the same group. Whereas psychological safety only influenced fearful attachment styles at work. In terms of individual level perceived work environment, the results revealed that perceived interactional justice had power to recreate secure attachment styles at work, and the dismissing attachment styles at work who had model of office working. However, individual level perceived environment namely, supervisor support and managerial trust showed no influence on recreating attachment styles at work.

ISBN: 9798352636053Subjects--Topical Terms:

516855
Problem solving.

Some Determinants and Consequences of Attachment Styles at Work.
LDR:05492nmm a2200397 4500 001 2402528
005 20241029122315.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798352636053
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29442934
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Marmara_11424281043
035 $a AAI29442934
035 $a 2402528
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Uzunkoca, Ulfet. $3 3772762
245 1 0 $a Some Determinants and Consequences of Attachment Styles at Work.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 162 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Turgut, Tulay.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Marmara Universitesi (Turkey), 2022.
520 $a The objective of this paper was to highlight the attachment styles are significant construct at organizational settings. Correspondingly, the study aimed to estimate attachment styles at work in terms of individual factors (generalized attachment style) and work environment factors (psychological safety, interactional justice, managerial affect-based trust, supervisor support), and its relationship with emotional exhaustion and exploratory behaviours. The sample consisted of 556 employees working in various sectors and different organizations in Turkey. Hypothesized relationships related to determinants of the attachment styles at work were tested with stepwise regression analysis (forward inclusion). Moreover, hypothesized relationships related to consequences of attachments styles at work were tested with t-test and one-way ANOVA. Predictably, the results revealed that attachments styles at work is a significant construct in understanding work-related attitudes and behaviours namely, emotional exhaustion and exploratory behaviours. As to determinants of attachment styles at work the results showed that individual factors, namely one's generalized attachment styles was the major determinants of one's attachment styles at work. Moreover, the results showed that team level perceived work environment such as psychological unsafety is a better predictor than both individual level perceived work environment and positive work environment such as psychological safety. Detailly, psychological unsafety influenced both secure and fearful as well as with preoccupied attachment at work. Moreover, it also influenced dismissing attachment styles at work who had less than 2 years' experience in the same group. Whereas psychological safety only influenced fearful attachment styles at work. In terms of individual level perceived work environment, the results revealed that perceived interactional justice had power to recreate secure attachment styles at work, and the dismissing attachment styles at work who had model of office working. However, individual level perceived environment namely, supervisor support and managerial trust showed no influence on recreating attachment styles at work.
520 $a Bu tezin amaci baglanma stillerinin orgutsel ortamlarda onemli bir yapi oldugunu vurgulamaktir. Bu dogrultuda calismada, bireysel (genel baglanma stili) ve calisma ortami (psikolojik guvenlik, etkilesimsel adalet, yonetici guveni, yonetici destegi) faktorleri temelinde iste baglanma stillerinin belirleyicilerini tespit etme ve duygusal tukenme ile kesfedici davranislar ile iliskisinin ortaya konmasi amaclanmistir. Orneklemi Turkiye'de cesitli sektorlerde ve farkli kuruluslarda calisan 556 calisan olusturmustur. Iste baglanma stillerinin belirleyicileri ile ilgili hipotezler regresyon analizi ile test edilmistir. Iste baglanma stillerinin is ciktilariyla ilgili hipotezler ise t-testi ve tek yonlu ANOVA ile test edilmistir. Beklenildigi gibi sonuclar iste baglanma stillerinin isle ilgili tutum ve davranislari, yani duygusal tukenme ve kesfedici davranislari anlamada onemli bir yapi oldugunu ortaya koymustur. Iste baglanma stillerinin belirleyicilerine iliskin sonuclar, bireysel faktorlerin, yani kisinin genel baglanma stilinin, kisinin iste baglanma stilinin ana belirleyicisi oldugunu gostermistir. Bununla birlikte, sonuclar psikolojik guvensizlik gibi ekip duzeyinde algilanan calisma ortaminin hem bireysel duzeyde algilanan calisma ortamindan hem de psikolojik guvenlik gibi olumlu calisma ortamindan daha iyi bir yordayici oldugunu gostermistir. Ayrintili olarak, psikolojik guvensizlik hem iste guvenli hem de iste korkulu baglanma stiliyle birlikte iste saplantili baglanma stilini de etkiledigini gostermistir. Ayrica, ayni grupta 2 yildan az deneyim olmasi durumunda iste kayitsiz baglanma stilini de etkilemistir. Diger yandan psikolojik guvenlik sadece iste korkulu baglanma stilini etkilemistir. Bireysel duzeyde algilanan calisma ortami acisindan sonuclar ise, algilanan etkilesimsel adaletin iste guvenli baglanma stilini ve ofis calismasi modelinde iste kayitsiz baglanma stilini yeniden sekillendirme gucune sahip oldugunu ortaya koymustur. Bununla birlikte, bireysel duzeyde algilanan cevre, yani yonetici destegi ve yonetici guveni, iste baglanma stillerinin yeniden sekillendirmesinde bir etkisi olmadigini gostermistir.
590 $a School code: 2160.
650 4 $a Problem solving. $3 516855
650 4 $a Behavior. $3 532476
650 4 $a Attachment. $3 3767756
650 4 $a Psychoanalysis. $3 519030
650 4 $a Personality. $3 516529
650 4 $a Cognitive dissonance. $3 630028
650 4 $a Emotions. $3 524569
650 4 $a Intimacy. $3 3292435
650 4 $a Mothers. $3 598165
650 4 $a Social interaction. $3 520415
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Caregivers. $3 580207
650 4 $a Attitudes. $3 1973410
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Adults. $3 2157228
650 4 $a Babies. $3 3556699
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0629
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a Marmara Universitesi (Turkey). $3 3555089
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04B.
790 $a 2160
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29442934