東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Beyond Mechanism: Rethinking Kant's ...

Gonzalez, Juan Carlos.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Beyond Mechanism: Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Beyond Mechanism: Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment./
作者:	Gonzalez, Juan Carlos.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	298 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-01A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31236954
ISBN:	9798383209677

Beyond Mechanism: Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.
Gonzalez, Juan Carlos.

Beyond Mechanism: Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 298 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2024.

My dissertation defends a non-mechanistic interpretation of Kant's philosophy of nature. Inspired by the picture of nature in the Critique of Pure Reason and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, most readers align Kant with Early Modern mechanists, who claim that we can know that the internally purposive form of causality characteristic of organisms has no place in nature. To these mechanistic readers, Kant banishes internal purposiveness from nature. To moderate mechanistic interpreters, because we cannot know whether there are internally purposive things in nature and we can demonstrate that mechanism applies to nature, Kant pushes us to believe that any seemingly internally purposive natural products will eventually be explained in mechanistic terms. To strong mechanistic interpreters, Kant gives us the tools to know that there is no room for the special kind of teleology organisms exhibit in nature. My non-mechanistic interpretation rejects this trend by arguing that Kant urges us to believe that the internally purposive activity characteristic of organisms exists in nature. Belief in this context is a firm, positive, and voluntary attitude that aligns with and serves a subject's interests and ends, and that has implications for the subject's rational action, assertion, and deliberation. Kant's stated goal in the third Critique is to bridge the gulf between freedom and nature. My non-mechanistic interpretation offers a new account of how Kant promises to construct this bridge.

ISBN: 9798383209677Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Kant, Immanuel

Beyond Mechanism: Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.
LDR:02727nmm a2200409 4500 001 2401603
005 20241022110533.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798383209677
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31236954
035 $a AAI31236954
035 $a 2401603
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gonzalez, Juan Carlos. $3 3181405
245 1 0 $a Beyond Mechanism: Rethinking Kant's Philosophy of Nature With the Critique of the Power of Judgment.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 298 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Tolley, Clinton.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2024.
520 $a My dissertation defends a non-mechanistic interpretation of Kant's philosophy of nature. Inspired by the picture of nature in the Critique of Pure Reason and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, most readers align Kant with Early Modern mechanists, who claim that we can know that the internally purposive form of causality characteristic of organisms has no place in nature. To these mechanistic readers, Kant banishes internal purposiveness from nature. To moderate mechanistic interpreters, because we cannot know whether there are internally purposive things in nature and we can demonstrate that mechanism applies to nature, Kant pushes us to believe that any seemingly internally purposive natural products will eventually be explained in mechanistic terms. To strong mechanistic interpreters, Kant gives us the tools to know that there is no room for the special kind of teleology organisms exhibit in nature. My non-mechanistic interpretation rejects this trend by arguing that Kant urges us to believe that the internally purposive activity characteristic of organisms exists in nature. Belief in this context is a firm, positive, and voluntary attitude that aligns with and serves a subject's interests and ends, and that has implications for the subject's rational action, assertion, and deliberation. Kant's stated goal in the third Critique is to bridge the gulf between freedom and nature. My non-mechanistic interpretation offers a new account of how Kant promises to construct this bridge.
590 $a School code: 0033.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
650 4 $a Philosophy of science. $2 bicssc $3 2079849
653 $a Kant, Immanuel
653 $a Mechanism
653 $a Organisms
653 $a Philosophy of nature
653 $a Teleology
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0402
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0396
710 2 $a University of California, San Diego. $b Philosophy. $3 1670992
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-01A.
790 $a 0033
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31236954