東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Computational Methods in the Study o...

Kann, Claudia K.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Computational Methods in the Study of Political Behavior.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Computational Methods in the Study of Political Behavior./
作者:	Kann, Claudia K.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	194 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-03B.
標題:	Collective action. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30604293
ISBN:	9798380269735

Computational Methods in the Study of Political Behavior.
Kann, Claudia K.

Computational Methods in the Study of Political Behavior. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 194 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--California Institute of Technology, 2023.

In this thesis, I explore how individual-level actions contribute to aggregate political outcomes. In each chapter, I aim to understand an observed political behavior using data or methodologies previously unused in their contexts. The subject matter ranges from protest activity and vote choice to theoretical opinion models and re-examining how socioeconomic class is understood in quantitative work.In the first two chapters I employ novel datasets to understand phenomena where popular theories differ from empirical observations. In Chapter 1 I examine protest behavior, which is not the equilibrium prediction of models of collective action. I investigate what aspects of published language can predict protest participation and how these change leading up to and following protests. Specifically, I collect and, using natural language processing methods, analyze 4 million tweets of individuals who participated in the Black Lives Matter protests during the summer of 2020. Using geographical and temporal variation to isolate results, I find evidence that interest in the subject, measured as percentage of online time discussing the matter, is correlated with protest behavior. However, I also find that collective identity, measured through pronoun use, does not have a strong relationship with protest behavior.Next, in Chapter 2, I use a survey-which I helped to develop and field-to understand the 2020 midterm elections' surprising results. While most accepted models of midterm elections predicted massive Democratic losses (averaging around 40 seats in the House), these predictions were not met. In fact, the Democratic party did well-they did not lose a single state legislature, expanded some majorities, and lost only 9 seats in the House of Representatives. Testing various models of midterm elections, I show that the 2020 midterms were issue-based elections, where views on abortion had a large impact on vote choice.In the second half of the thesis I focus on methodologies. Specifically, in Chapter 3, I expanded on mathematical models of consensus building to better mimic reality. Bounded confidence models have historically been used to explain convergence of opinions. In this chapter I add a repulsive element, modeling the inclination to differentiate oneself from someone who otherwise has similar beliefs. With this added component, convergence is no longer assumed. I explore both analytical and simulated numerical results to understand the dynamics of opinions in this new context.Finally, in Chapter 4, I introduce a method for operationalizing socioeconomic class as a latent variable in regression models. While there has been a plethora of research which shows that class affects opinions, views, and actions, the definition of class is nebulous. I argue that this is a result of the nature of class, which is context dependent. Therefore, rather than explicitly determining class, I present using class within a mixture model framework. This allows for the exact definition of class to change within the context being analyzed and enables researchers to use class within their work. Following the theoretical arguments, I present the efficacy of the approach using the American National Election Studies survey from 2020 to show how class differs when related to views of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency and the Black Lives Matter movement.

ISBN: 9798380269735Subjects--Topical Terms:

3556016
Collective action.

Computational Methods in the Study of Political Behavior.
LDR:04487nmm a2200361 4500 001 2401304
005 20241022112131.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380269735
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30604293
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Caltech_oaithesislibrarycaltechedu15187
035 $a AAI30604293
035 $a 2401304
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kann, Claudia K. $3 3771390
245 1 0 $a Computational Methods in the Study of Political Behavior.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 194 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Alvarez, Mike.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--California Institute of Technology, 2023.
520 $a In this thesis, I explore how individual-level actions contribute to aggregate political outcomes. In each chapter, I aim to understand an observed political behavior using data or methodologies previously unused in their contexts. The subject matter ranges from protest activity and vote choice to theoretical opinion models and re-examining how socioeconomic class is understood in quantitative work.In the first two chapters I employ novel datasets to understand phenomena where popular theories differ from empirical observations. In Chapter 1 I examine protest behavior, which is not the equilibrium prediction of models of collective action. I investigate what aspects of published language can predict protest participation and how these change leading up to and following protests. Specifically, I collect and, using natural language processing methods, analyze 4 million tweets of individuals who participated in the Black Lives Matter protests during the summer of 2020. Using geographical and temporal variation to isolate results, I find evidence that interest in the subject, measured as percentage of online time discussing the matter, is correlated with protest behavior. However, I also find that collective identity, measured through pronoun use, does not have a strong relationship with protest behavior.Next, in Chapter 2, I use a survey-which I helped to develop and field-to understand the 2020 midterm elections' surprising results. While most accepted models of midterm elections predicted massive Democratic losses (averaging around 40 seats in the House), these predictions were not met. In fact, the Democratic party did well-they did not lose a single state legislature, expanded some majorities, and lost only 9 seats in the House of Representatives. Testing various models of midterm elections, I show that the 2020 midterms were issue-based elections, where views on abortion had a large impact on vote choice.In the second half of the thesis I focus on methodologies. Specifically, in Chapter 3, I expanded on mathematical models of consensus building to better mimic reality. Bounded confidence models have historically been used to explain convergence of opinions. In this chapter I add a repulsive element, modeling the inclination to differentiate oneself from someone who otherwise has similar beliefs. With this added component, convergence is no longer assumed. I explore both analytical and simulated numerical results to understand the dynamics of opinions in this new context.Finally, in Chapter 4, I introduce a method for operationalizing socioeconomic class as a latent variable in regression models. While there has been a plethora of research which shows that class affects opinions, views, and actions, the definition of class is nebulous. I argue that this is a result of the nature of class, which is context dependent. Therefore, rather than explicitly determining class, I present using class within a mixture model framework. This allows for the exact definition of class to change within the context being analyzed and enables researchers to use class within their work. Following the theoretical arguments, I present the efficacy of the approach using the American National Election Studies survey from 2020 to show how class differs when related to views of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency and the Black Lives Matter movement.
590 $a School code: 0037.
650 4 $a Collective action. $3 3556016
650 4 $a Racial justice. $3 3771391
650 4 $a Criminal statistics. $3 847093
650 4 $a Midterm elections. $3 3771392
650 4 $a Political parties. $3 516328
650 4 $a Election results. $3 3556048
650 4 $a Probability. $3 518898
650 4 $a Race. $3 529036
650 4 $a Demonstrations & protests. $3 3560963
650 4 $a Abortion. $3 818164
650 4 $a Violent crime. $3 3684048
650 4 $a Congressional elections. $3 3682781
650 4 $a Black Lives Matter movement. $3 3771393
650 4 $a Immigration. $2 lcstt $3 3267320
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0463
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a California Institute of Technology. $b Humanities and Social Sciences. $3 3770873
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-03B.
790 $a 0037
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30604293