東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Sex Differences in Pain Perception a...

Traylor, Zachary.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Sex Differences in Pain Perception and Event Related Neural Correlates of Pain.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sex Differences in Pain Perception and Event Related Neural Correlates of Pain./
作者:	Traylor, Zachary.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	48 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-11.
標題:	Physiology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30400552
ISBN:	9798379472139

Sex Differences in Pain Perception and Event Related Neural Correlates of Pain.
Traylor, Zachary.

Sex Differences in Pain Perception and Event Related Neural Correlates of Pain. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 48 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--North Carolina State University, 2023.

Women have a higher incidence of pain-related conditions, reports of pain, and are generally considered by medical professionals to have less tolerance for pain. These beliefs have pervaded society as well, with many believing women to be weaker, or sometimes stronger, than men. The effect on clinical research has also been profound, with many clinical trials and models failing to account for differences between the sexes in dangerous ways. Actual consensus in research on the subject of this difference has become a debate, with most researchers supporting the difference, some denying it, some explaining that it's complicated, and others still failing to report on it in their results.This study seeks to provide a neuroscientific approach to this problem via analyzing eventrelated EEG components indicative of pain, paired with a traditional behavioral analysis of pain perception. Previous research has largely neglected the ability of neuroscience to shed further light on differences in pain processing between men and women. By leveraging the well-studied painevoked potential, we demonstrate that the difference between men and women regarding pain perception may not be as reliable as literature suggests.A public dataset of 51 subjects was used (25 female) containing physiological and behavioral data, and a repeated-measures ANCOVA was conducted to determine the impact of sex (male or female) on pain thresholds, verbal pain ratings, N1 amplitude, N2 amplitude, P2 amplitude, and Gamma band power while controlling for between-subject differences and stimulus intensity. Results indicate no significant differences between men and women in any of the measured dependent variables. We propose potential alternative sources for the well-studied paingap between sexes, including psych-sociocultural sources and the need for more nuanced models, as our results do not support the existence of this pain gap between men and women in response to laser-evoked pain. In total, this study presents a novel application of statistics and event-related EEG analysis to question the extent of the difference between men and women's pain perception.

ISBN: 9798379472139Subjects--Topical Terms:

518431
Physiology.

Sex Differences in Pain Perception and Event Related Neural Correlates of Pain.
LDR:03300nmm a2200409 4500 001 2401051
005 20241015112507.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379472139
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30400552
035 $a (MiAaPQ)NCState_Univ18402040263
035 $a AAI30400552
035 $a 2401051
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Traylor, Zachary. $3 3771112
245 1 0 $a Sex Differences in Pain Perception and Event Related Neural Correlates of Pain.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 48 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.
500 $a Advisor: Nam, Chang S.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--North Carolina State University, 2023.
520 $a Women have a higher incidence of pain-related conditions, reports of pain, and are generally considered by medical professionals to have less tolerance for pain. These beliefs have pervaded society as well, with many believing women to be weaker, or sometimes stronger, than men. The effect on clinical research has also been profound, with many clinical trials and models failing to account for differences between the sexes in dangerous ways. Actual consensus in research on the subject of this difference has become a debate, with most researchers supporting the difference, some denying it, some explaining that it's complicated, and others still failing to report on it in their results.This study seeks to provide a neuroscientific approach to this problem via analyzing eventrelated EEG components indicative of pain, paired with a traditional behavioral analysis of pain perception. Previous research has largely neglected the ability of neuroscience to shed further light on differences in pain processing between men and women. By leveraging the well-studied painevoked potential, we demonstrate that the difference between men and women regarding pain perception may not be as reliable as literature suggests.A public dataset of 51 subjects was used (25 female) containing physiological and behavioral data, and a repeated-measures ANCOVA was conducted to determine the impact of sex (male or female) on pain thresholds, verbal pain ratings, N1 amplitude, N2 amplitude, P2 amplitude, and Gamma band power while controlling for between-subject differences and stimulus intensity. Results indicate no significant differences between men and women in any of the measured dependent variables. We propose potential alternative sources for the well-studied paingap between sexes, including psych-sociocultural sources and the need for more nuanced models, as our results do not support the existence of this pain gap between men and women in response to laser-evoked pain. In total, this study presents a novel application of statistics and event-related EEG analysis to question the extent of the difference between men and women's pain perception.
590 $a School code: 0155.
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
650 4 $a Gender differences. $3 3548331
650 4 $a Sample size. $3 3642155
650 4 $a Cold. $3 560283
650 4 $a Software. $2 gtt. $3 619355
650 4 $a Source studies. $3 3556295
650 4 $a Electrodes. $3 629151
650 4 $a Lasers. $3 535503
650 4 $a Power. $3 518736
650 4 $a Brain research. $3 3561789
650 4 $a Chronic pain. $3 527865
650 4 $a Medical research. $2 bicssc $3 1556686
650 4 $a Females. $3 1629802
650 4 $a Women. $3 531755
650 4 $a Sexes. $3 3685774
650 4 $a Cognition & reasoning. $3 3556293
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Gender studies. $3 2122708
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 588700
650 4 $a Optics. $3 517925
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
690 $a 0719
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0733
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0752
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a North Carolina State University. $3 1018772
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-11.
790 $a 0155
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30400552