東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Collaborative Learning with a Geomet...

Saltzman, Ethlyn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game: The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game: The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning./
作者:	Saltzman, Ethlyn.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-12A.
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29167861
ISBN:	9798802720653

Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game: The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.
Saltzman, Ethlyn.

Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game: The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 156 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2022.

The study examined the effects of a new game mechanic on collaborative learning and mathematical discourse when playing a digital geometry puzzle game. For this study, two new versions of the game "Noobs vs. Leets" were developed. Both versions of the game teach the concepts of complementary and supplementary angles and the angle sum theorem of triangles. It was hypothesized that the version of the game that included a game mechanic that allow players to manipulate the angles, thus creating a more open-ended task, would be more intrinsically motivating, promote elaboration of the geometric concepts, and lead to greater learning gains. However, no differences were found between the two versions of the game in individual learning outcomes, the degree of mathematical elaboration by the pairs, or individual interest, effort or competence. Elaboration of the mathematical concepts in the pairs' discourse in the procedural game levels did predict individual procedural learning outcomes. Elaboration of reasoning did not, however, predict conceptual learning. To understand why no differences were found between the two versions of the game and why there was not a stronger link between elaborative reasoning and conceptual learning, eight representative pairs were chosen for more in-depth analysis. This analysis revealed that the pairs varied tremendously not only in their level of cognitive engagement but also in the quality of their social interactions. I conclude that successful collaborative learning with serious games requires not only careful consideration of how to align the game mechanics with the learning goals but also how to promote positive social rapport between players, as without this rapport, students will be unlikely to learn from one another or from the game. Future research on collaborative learning with digital games should examine not only the role of cognitive engagement in learning but also the role of social rapport.

ISBN: 9798802720653Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Collaborative learning

Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game: The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.
LDR:03114nmm a2200373 4500 001 2400932
005 20241007100308.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798802720653
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29167861
035 $a AAI29167861
035 $a 2400932
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Saltzman, Ethlyn. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-0282-7971 $3 3770995
245 1 0 $a Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game: The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Homer, Bruce.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2022.
520 $a The study examined the effects of a new game mechanic on collaborative learning and mathematical discourse when playing a digital geometry puzzle game. For this study, two new versions of the game "Noobs vs. Leets" were developed. Both versions of the game teach the concepts of complementary and supplementary angles and the angle sum theorem of triangles. It was hypothesized that the version of the game that included a game mechanic that allow players to manipulate the angles, thus creating a more open-ended task, would be more intrinsically motivating, promote elaboration of the geometric concepts, and lead to greater learning gains. However, no differences were found between the two versions of the game in individual learning outcomes, the degree of mathematical elaboration by the pairs, or individual interest, effort or competence. Elaboration of the mathematical concepts in the pairs' discourse in the procedural game levels did predict individual procedural learning outcomes. Elaboration of reasoning did not, however, predict conceptual learning. To understand why no differences were found between the two versions of the game and why there was not a stronger link between elaborative reasoning and conceptual learning, eight representative pairs were chosen for more in-depth analysis. This analysis revealed that the pairs varied tremendously not only in their level of cognitive engagement but also in the quality of their social interactions. I conclude that successful collaborative learning with serious games requires not only careful consideration of how to align the game mechanics with the learning goals but also how to promote positive social rapport between players, as without this rapport, students will be unlikely to learn from one another or from the game. Future research on collaborative learning with digital games should examine not only the role of cognitive engagement in learning but also the role of social rapport.
590 $a School code: 0046.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
653 $a Collaborative learning
653 $a Cooperative learning
653 $a Games
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b Educational Psychology. $3 1024111
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-12A.
790 $a 0046
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29167861