東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Epistemological Reading of Trans...

Beizaei, Banafsheh.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Epistemological Reading of Transcendental Idealism: A New Outline and Defense.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Epistemological Reading of Transcendental Idealism: A New Outline and Defense./
作者:	Beizaei, Banafsheh.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	179 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-04A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30525833
ISBN:	9798380619813

The Epistemological Reading of Transcendental Idealism: A New Outline and Defense.
Beizaei, Banafsheh.

The Epistemological Reading of Transcendental Idealism: A New Outline and Defense. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 179 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.

This dissertation offers a new outline for and defense of the epistemological reading of transcendental idealism, the philosophical system put forward by Immanuel Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason (1781/7). A central claim of transcendental idealism is that we can only cognize things as they appear; we cannot cognize things as they are in themselves. According to the epistemological reading of transcendental idealism, the distinction between appearances and things in themselves ('the transcendental distinction') is not a metaphysical distinction but a distinction between different ways of considering things. The epistemological reading stands in contrast to metaphysical readings, which take the transcendental distinction to be a metaphysical distinction. Over the past two decades, metaphysical readings have come to be the preferred reading among Kant scholars, and, thanks to powerful criticisms put forward by metaphysically-inclined readers, the epistemological reading has come to be deemed unsalvageably confused. This dissertation attempts to challenge the prevailing orthodoxy by showing the epistemological reading to be coherent and capable of countering the criticisms it has faced.In the first chapter, I formulate the main commitments of the epistemological reading, and, drawing on the Fregean notion of mode of presentation, develop a new outline for the epistemological reading modeled on a contemporary defense of physicalism known as the phenomenal concept strategy. In the second chapter, I respond to the major objections that the epistemological reading has faced, such as the objection that it cannot accommodate ordinary intuitions about the essential spatiotemporality of empirical objects. In the third chapter, I address the main misunderstandings of the epistemological reading, most of which have to do with the role played by the notion of abstraction in the epistemological reader's account of things in themselves, and discuss how the proposed reading differs from moderate or one-object metaphysical readings of transcendental idealism. In the fourth chapter, I argue that the textual evidence in favor of the epistemological reading cannot be explained away by metaphysical readers, and that the epistemological reading is able to accommodate passages that may prima facie seem to contradict it.

ISBN: 9798380619813Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Kant

The Epistemological Reading of Transcendental Idealism: A New Outline and Defense.
LDR:03453nmm a2200373 4500 001 2399720
005 20240916065952.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380619813
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30525833
035 $a AAI30525833
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Beizaei, Banafsheh. $3 3769694
245 1 0 $a The Epistemological Reading of Transcendental Idealism: A New Outline and Defense.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 179 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Jauernig, Anja.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.
520 $a This dissertation offers a new outline for and defense of the epistemological reading of transcendental idealism, the philosophical system put forward by Immanuel Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason (1781/7). A central claim of transcendental idealism is that we can only cognize things as they appear; we cannot cognize things as they are in themselves. According to the epistemological reading of transcendental idealism, the distinction between appearances and things in themselves ('the transcendental distinction') is not a metaphysical distinction but a distinction between different ways of considering things. The epistemological reading stands in contrast to metaphysical readings, which take the transcendental distinction to be a metaphysical distinction. Over the past two decades, metaphysical readings have come to be the preferred reading among Kant scholars, and, thanks to powerful criticisms put forward by metaphysically-inclined readers, the epistemological reading has come to be deemed unsalvageably confused. This dissertation attempts to challenge the prevailing orthodoxy by showing the epistemological reading to be coherent and capable of countering the criticisms it has faced.In the first chapter, I formulate the main commitments of the epistemological reading, and, drawing on the Fregean notion of mode of presentation, develop a new outline for the epistemological reading modeled on a contemporary defense of physicalism known as the phenomenal concept strategy. In the second chapter, I respond to the major objections that the epistemological reading has faced, such as the objection that it cannot accommodate ordinary intuitions about the essential spatiotemporality of empirical objects. In the third chapter, I address the main misunderstandings of the epistemological reading, most of which have to do with the role played by the notion of abstraction in the epistemological reader's account of things in themselves, and discuss how the proposed reading differs from moderate or one-object metaphysical readings of transcendental idealism. In the fourth chapter, I argue that the textual evidence in favor of the epistemological reading cannot be explained away by metaphysical readers, and that the epistemological reading is able to accommodate passages that may prima facie seem to contradict it.
590 $a School code: 0146.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
653 $a Kant
653 $a Mode of presentation
653 $a Transcendental idealism
653 $a Defense
653 $a Outline
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0393
710 2 $a New York University. $b Philosophy. $3 1031970
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-04A.
790 $a 0146
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30525833