東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

We Report, We Decide: Pre-primary Pr...

Shor, Matthew R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

We Report, We Decide: Pre-primary Presidential Campaigns in the New Media Landscape.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	We Report, We Decide: Pre-primary Presidential Campaigns in the New Media Landscape./
作者:	Shor, Matthew R.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	288 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-02A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30633152
ISBN:	9798380091671

We Report, We Decide: Pre-primary Presidential Campaigns in the New Media Landscape.
Shor, Matthew R.

We Report, We Decide: Pre-primary Presidential Campaigns in the New Media Landscape. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 288 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2023.

Although it began with two messier election cycles in 1972 and 1976, the contemporary presidential nomination system of binding delegates in public voting contests evinced remarkable stability over the subsequent two decades. Party elites ostensibly adapted by learning how to direct the nomination toward consensus candidates through coordinated public endorsements during the pre-primary period. However, this endorsement-centric theory has encountered several problematic election cycles since the start of the new millennium during which factional, outsider candidates have grown increasingly formidable. This dissertation first charts the twin democratization trends of the political process and the media landscape, explaining how these trends work in tandem to dislodge establishment control over presidential nominations. Then the tenor of pre-primary media coverage is explored, demonstrating how the campaign garners abundant media attention with an increasing emphasis on personality, style, and populist rhetoric. Next, the dissertation examines the extent to which pre-primary media attention independently influences candidate standing and finds evidence of a direct causal relationship between a candidate's media coverage and their poll standing. Finally, two campaign case studies are presented that illustrate how a candidate's media persona, not simply their command of traditional resources, substantially determines their campaign's viability. The resulting presidential nomination system, according to this dissertation, is an increasingly chaotic media-centric process that is not easily managed by the party establishment, and in this way more{A0}closely reflects the concerns an earlier generation of scholars expressed regarding the pitfalls of the contemporary system.

ISBN: 9798380091671Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Presidential nomination

We Report, We Decide: Pre-primary Presidential Campaigns in the New Media Landscape.
LDR:02972nmm a2200385 4500 001 2399415
005 20240916065433.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380091671
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30633152
035 $a AAI30633152
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shor, Matthew R. $3 3769383
245 1 0 $a We Report, We Decide: Pre-primary Presidential Campaigns in the New Media Landscape.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 288 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Burden, Barry C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2023.
520 $a Although it began with two messier election cycles in 1972 and 1976, the contemporary presidential nomination system of binding delegates in public voting contests evinced remarkable stability over the subsequent two decades. Party elites ostensibly adapted by learning how to direct the nomination toward consensus candidates through coordinated public endorsements during the pre-primary period. However, this endorsement-centric theory has encountered several problematic election cycles since the start of the new millennium during which factional, outsider candidates have grown increasingly formidable. This dissertation first charts the twin democratization trends of the political process and the media landscape, explaining how these trends work in tandem to dislodge establishment control over presidential nominations. Then the tenor of pre-primary media coverage is explored, demonstrating how the campaign garners abundant media attention with an increasing emphasis on personality, style, and populist rhetoric. Next, the dissertation examines the extent to which pre-primary media attention independently influences candidate standing and finds evidence of a direct causal relationship between a candidate's media coverage and their poll standing. Finally, two campaign case studies are presented that illustrate how a candidate's media persona, not simply their command of traditional resources, substantially determines their campaign's viability. The resulting presidential nomination system, according to this dissertation, is an increasingly chaotic media-centric process that is not easily managed by the party establishment, and in this way more{A0}closely reflects the concerns an earlier generation of scholars expressed regarding the pitfalls of the contemporary system.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 3422380
650 4 $a Multimedia communications. $3 590562
653 $a Presidential nomination
653 $a Public voting
653 $a Election cycles
653 $a Media landscape
653 $a Political process
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0558
690 $a 0708
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Political Science. $3 2049944
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-02A.
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30633152