東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Bird-Window Collisions: Field Testin...

Riggs, Georgia J.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Bird-Window Collisions: Field Testing a Potential Solution and Evaluating Stakeholder Perceptions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Bird-Window Collisions: Field Testing a Potential Solution and Evaluating Stakeholder Perceptions./
作者:	Riggs, Georgia J.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	88 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-07.
標題:	Wildlife conservation. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28543094
ISBN:	9798762177559

Bird-Window Collisions: Field Testing a Potential Solution and Evaluating Stakeholder Perceptions.
Riggs, Georgia J.

Bird-Window Collisions: Field Testing a Potential Solution and Evaluating Stakeholder Perceptions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 88 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07.

Thesis (M.S.)--Oklahoma State University, 2021.

Bird-window collisions are a major source of human-caused avian mortality for which there are multiple mitigation and prevention options available. Despite growing availability of products designed to reduce collisions, few replicated field tests have been conducted. Such tests are crucial to assessing effectiveness of products in real-world situations after installation on glass. The widespread adoption of available mitigation and prevention approaches, which is ultimately necessary to reduce bird-window collisions, also relies on understanding human perceptions. To address these research needs imperative to reducing this major source of avian mortality, we conducted two studies.First, we conducted a well-replicated field study to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially marketed product (Feather Friendly® markers) in reducing bird-window collisions at glass-walled bus shelters in Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. This study included a before-after control-impact (BACI) analysis comparing numbers of collisions at 18 bus shelters in both pre-treatment (2016) and post-treatment (2020) periods, and an analysis comparing 18 treated and 18 untreated shelters during 2020. Both analyses found that the treatment was highly effective and together, these analyses provide a rigorous field test of the effectiveness of this treatment option in reducing bird-window collisions.Second, we investigated stakeholder perceptions and priorities related to bird-window collision mitigation and prevention. Specifically, we used a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT)-Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework to learn more about the most effective ways to engage the public in helping to reduce bird-window collisions. Our results demonstrate that respondents from two stakeholder groups, homeowners and conservation practitioners, have an overall positive perception toward reducing bird-window collisions and that they believe the benefits of implementing mitigation and prevention techniques outweigh obstacles that may impede such measures. Our results indicate that the public may be receptive to education on this issue and that targeted and active education may be successful in garnering public support for and participation in bird-window collision mitigation and prevention.Together, these two studies help make substantial progress in mitigating and preventing bird-window collisions.

ISBN: 9798762177559Subjects--Topical Terms:

542165
Wildlife conservation.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Before-after control-impact

Bird-Window Collisions: Field Testing a Potential Solution and Evaluating Stakeholder Perceptions.
LDR:03610nmm a2200397 4500 001 2398984
005 20240909062208.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798762177559
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28543094
035 $a AAI28543094
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Riggs, Georgia J. $3 3768945
245 1 0 $a Bird-Window Collisions: Field Testing a Potential Solution and Evaluating Stakeholder Perceptions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 88 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07.
500 $a Advisor: Loss, Scott R.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Oklahoma State University, 2021.
520 $a Bird-window collisions are a major source of human-caused avian mortality for which there are multiple mitigation and prevention options available. Despite growing availability of products designed to reduce collisions, few replicated field tests have been conducted. Such tests are crucial to assessing effectiveness of products in real-world situations after installation on glass. The widespread adoption of available mitigation and prevention approaches, which is ultimately necessary to reduce bird-window collisions, also relies on understanding human perceptions. To address these research needs imperative to reducing this major source of avian mortality, we conducted two studies.First, we conducted a well-replicated field study to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially marketed product (Feather Friendly® markers) in reducing bird-window collisions at glass-walled bus shelters in Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. This study included a before-after control-impact (BACI) analysis comparing numbers of collisions at 18 bus shelters in both pre-treatment (2016) and post-treatment (2020) periods, and an analysis comparing 18 treated and 18 untreated shelters during 2020. Both analyses found that the treatment was highly effective and together, these analyses provide a rigorous field test of the effectiveness of this treatment option in reducing bird-window collisions.Second, we investigated stakeholder perceptions and priorities related to bird-window collision mitigation and prevention. Specifically, we used a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT)-Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework to learn more about the most effective ways to engage the public in helping to reduce bird-window collisions. Our results demonstrate that respondents from two stakeholder groups, homeowners and conservation practitioners, have an overall positive perception toward reducing bird-window collisions and that they believe the benefits of implementing mitigation and prevention techniques outweigh obstacles that may impede such measures. Our results indicate that the public may be receptive to education on this issue and that targeted and active education may be successful in garnering public support for and participation in bird-window collision mitigation and prevention.Together, these two studies help make substantial progress in mitigating and preventing bird-window collisions.
590 $a School code: 0664.
650 4 $a Wildlife conservation. $2 fast $3 542165
650 4 $a Ecology. $3 516476
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
653 $a Before-after control-impact
653 $a Bird collisions
653 $a Human dimensions
653 $a Stakeholder perceptions
653 $a Urban ecology
653 $a Window treatment
690 $a 0284
690 $a 0329
690 $a 0528
710 2 $a Oklahoma State University. $b Natural Resources and Ecology Management. $3 3169778
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-07.
790 $a 0664
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28543094