東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Environmental Impact of the Land...

Rutledge, Chris.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Environmental Impact of the Lands of the Dead: A Comparative Analysis.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Environmental Impact of the Lands of the Dead: A Comparative Analysis./
Author:	Rutledge, Chris.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	116 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-10.
Subject:	Sustainability. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30423132
ISBN:	9798379426262

The Environmental Impact of the Lands of the Dead: A Comparative Analysis.
Rutledge, Chris.

The Environmental Impact of the Lands of the Dead: A Comparative Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 116 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.

Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In the past 150 years, the American approach to death care has changed drastically. Using practices that I refer to as "modern traditional death care," a new industry has arisen that has normalized burial practices that once were reserved for very wealthy individuals. Today, average decedents undergo elaborate preparation processes meant to preserve them far beyond their final viewing. However, these practices may cause significant environmental damage by pollution of the soil, planting of monocultures, and stripping burial sites of indigenous flora and fauna (Loki et al., 2019).In response to the alarm raised by these methodologies, a competing practice called "natural death care" has arisen. Operating under a set of standards established by the Green Burial Council, the natural death care industry inters unembalmed corpses encased in biodegradable shrouds or coffins at a depth that facilitates their rapid decomposition (Webster, 2016). The natural death care industry's claim that its practices promote healthier ecologies seems intuitively plausible, but it is largely untested. My thesis research collected and analyzed data that examined these claims.During the summer of 2022, I traveled across the eastern United States from mid-Florida to near the Canadian border in New York State to visit paired sets of 20 modern traditional and 20 natural burial sites of similar size, located in the same zip code if possible, and if not in close geographical proximity. I collected six soil samples from each site, which I amalgamated and tested for bulk density and organic matter. I also used a quadrat placed at predetermined intervals to collect 18 floral biodiversity samples from{A0}each site, both photographing and filming the study areas in order to record the sampled flora for quantification. In addition to field work, I used satellite data to assess and to compare the paired burial sites. These methodologies were intended to test my hypotheses that natural burial sites would demonstrate greater verdancy, higher plant diversity, more invasive floral species, a higher percentage of soil organic matter, and lower soil bulk density when compared to their modern traditional counterparts.The data collected during the course of this study was insufficient to be authoritative, but it does tend to substantiate the claim that the practices of the natural death care industry are generally better for the environment than those of the modern traditional alternative. Conversely, the modern traditional burial sites I studied did not seem to pose the level of unmitigated threat to their proximate environments that their detractors suspect. For example, while biodiversity was very high at natural sites, so was the incursion of invasive species. Modern traditional sites, while less diverse, still showed a reasonable parameter range, and with better control of invasive species. NDVI was generally higher at natural sites, but not at all times of the year. Soil carbon analyses of differences between sites was inconclusive.This research should be useful to individuals wishing to make ecologically responsible choices regarding their own remains or those of loved ones, to future researchers wishing further to explore these topics, and to policy makers weighing the relative costs and benefits of these burial paradigms as they plan future developments.

ISBN: 9798379426262Subjects--Topical Terms:

1029978
Sustainability.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Churchyard

The Environmental Impact of the Lands of the Dead: A Comparative Analysis.
LDR:04609nmm a2200421 4500 001 2397576
005 20240711091746.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379426262
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30423132
035 $a AAI30423132
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rutledge, Chris. $3 3767353
245 1 0 $a The Environmental Impact of the Lands of the Dead: A Comparative Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 116 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.
500 $a Advisor: Leighton, Mark.
502 $a Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In the past 150 years, the American approach to death care has changed drastically. Using practices that I refer to as "modern traditional death care," a new industry has arisen that has normalized burial practices that once were reserved for very wealthy individuals. Today, average decedents undergo elaborate preparation processes meant to preserve them far beyond their final viewing. However, these practices may cause significant environmental damage by pollution of the soil, planting of monocultures, and stripping burial sites of indigenous flora and fauna (Loki et al., 2019).In response to the alarm raised by these methodologies, a competing practice called "natural death care" has arisen. Operating under a set of standards established by the Green Burial Council, the natural death care industry inters unembalmed corpses encased in biodegradable shrouds or coffins at a depth that facilitates their rapid decomposition (Webster, 2016). The natural death care industry's claim that its practices promote healthier ecologies seems intuitively plausible, but it is largely untested. My thesis research collected and analyzed data that examined these claims.During the summer of 2022, I traveled across the eastern United States from mid-Florida to near the Canadian border in New York State to visit paired sets of 20 modern traditional and 20 natural burial sites of similar size, located in the same zip code if possible, and if not in close geographical proximity. I collected six soil samples from each site, which I amalgamated and tested for bulk density and organic matter. I also used a quadrat placed at predetermined intervals to collect 18 floral biodiversity samples from{A0}each site, both photographing and filming the study areas in order to record the sampled flora for quantification. In addition to field work, I used satellite data to assess and to compare the paired burial sites. These methodologies were intended to test my hypotheses that natural burial sites would demonstrate greater verdancy, higher plant diversity, more invasive floral species, a higher percentage of soil organic matter, and lower soil bulk density when compared to their modern traditional counterparts.The data collected during the course of this study was insufficient to be authoritative, but it does tend to substantiate the claim that the practices of the natural death care industry are generally better for the environment than those of the modern traditional alternative. Conversely, the modern traditional burial sites I studied did not seem to pose the level of unmitigated threat to their proximate environments that their detractors suspect. For example, while biodiversity was very high at natural sites, so was the incursion of invasive species. Modern traditional sites, while less diverse, still showed a reasonable parameter range, and with better control of invasive species. NDVI was generally higher at natural sites, but not at all times of the year. Soil carbon analyses of differences between sites was inconclusive.This research should be useful to individuals wishing to make ecologically responsible choices regarding their own remains or those of loved ones, to future researchers wishing further to explore these topics, and to policy makers weighing the relative costs and benefits of these burial paradigms as they plan future developments.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
650 4 $a Soil sciences. $3 2122699
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
653 $a Churchyard
653 $a Graveyard
653 $a Green burial
653 $a Natural burial
653 $a Natural death care
653 $a Burial practices
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0481
690 $a 0474
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Extension Studies. $3 3560717
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-10.
790 $a 0084
791 $a A.L.M.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30423132