東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Transforming Errors into Learning Op...

Letelier, Evelyn Palominos.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning./
作者:	Letelier, Evelyn Palominos.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	232 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-04B.
標題:	Problem solving. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30610693
ISBN:	9798380492812

Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning.
Letelier, Evelyn Palominos.

Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 232 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Technology Sydney (Australia), 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This thesis explores how productive failure simulations influence nursing students' learning, perceptions and satisfaction compared with traditional simulations. Simulation-based learning enables learners to make mistakes and learn from them without compromising real patients' safety. Productive failure is a pedagogical approach that allows students to make mistakes as they solve novel learning tasks before receiving instruction. Productive failure simulations comprise a simulation followed by instruction, which contrasts with direct instruction simulations that begin with instruction followed by the simulation. Productive failure has facilitated meaningful learning outcomes in diverse educational settings, but no previous studies have examined the impact of productive failure in nursing simulation. To fill this research gap, an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods design with a three-stage approach was used.The first stage of the study, an integrative literature review, explored healthcare students' perceptions of making errors in simulation. It identified that supporting students to take responsibility for their mistakes is critical to moderating the negative impact of making errors and transforming them into learning opportunities.The second stage of this study resulted in the Learning from Errors conceptual model. Building on productive failure and error management training approaches, the model was designed to inform healthcare simulations that explicitly embrace learning from errors. This model includes the following elements: normalisation of errors, challenging simulation scenarios, self-directed learning, collaborative teamwork, and comparison with best practice.The third stage of this study evaluated nursing students' learning from and satisfaction with productive failure simulations compared to direct instruction simulations and explored students' perceptions of productive failure simulations. Participants were randomly allocated to either a productive failure group (n = 181) or a direct instruction group (n = 163). Quantitative data included knowledge tests measuring declarative knowledge, explanatory knowledge and transfer of learning, and the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale. Qualitative data involved interviews with students in the productive failure group.For explanatory knowledge and transfer of learning, the productive failure group outperformed the direct instruction group. This group also scored significantly higher on the satisfaction items related to reflection on practice and clinical learning. The qualitative results identified the following themes: the benefits of simulation prior to instruction; the value of performing a second simulation; and the importance of normalising errors.This doctoral study demonstrated that productive failure simulations improve nursing students' learning, perceptions and satisfaction levels. The thesis concludes with implications for nursing education, directions for further research, and recommendations for future practice.

ISBN: 9798380492812Subjects--Topical Terms:

516855
Problem solving.

Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning.
LDR:04259nmm a2200397 4500 001 2396553
005 20240611104329.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380492812
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30610693
035 $a (MiAaPQ)TechSydney10453168660
035 $a AAI30610693
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Letelier, Evelyn Palominos. $3 3766249
245 1 0 $a Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 232 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Levett-Jones, Tracy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Technology Sydney (Australia), 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This thesis explores how productive failure simulations influence nursing students' learning, perceptions and satisfaction compared with traditional simulations. Simulation-based learning enables learners to make mistakes and learn from them without compromising real patients' safety. Productive failure is a pedagogical approach that allows students to make mistakes as they solve novel learning tasks before receiving instruction. Productive failure simulations comprise a simulation followed by instruction, which contrasts with direct instruction simulations that begin with instruction followed by the simulation. Productive failure has facilitated meaningful learning outcomes in diverse educational settings, but no previous studies have examined the impact of productive failure in nursing simulation. To fill this research gap, an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods design with a three-stage approach was used.The first stage of the study, an integrative literature review, explored healthcare students' perceptions of making errors in simulation. It identified that supporting students to take responsibility for their mistakes is critical to moderating the negative impact of making errors and transforming them into learning opportunities.The second stage of this study resulted in the Learning from Errors conceptual model. Building on productive failure and error management training approaches, the model was designed to inform healthcare simulations that explicitly embrace learning from errors. This model includes the following elements: normalisation of errors, challenging simulation scenarios, self-directed learning, collaborative teamwork, and comparison with best practice.The third stage of this study evaluated nursing students' learning from and satisfaction with productive failure simulations compared to direct instruction simulations and explored students' perceptions of productive failure simulations. Participants were randomly allocated to either a productive failure group (n = 181) or a direct instruction group (n = 163). Quantitative data included knowledge tests measuring declarative knowledge, explanatory knowledge and transfer of learning, and the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale. Qualitative data involved interviews with students in the productive failure group.For explanatory knowledge and transfer of learning, the productive failure group outperformed the direct instruction group. This group also scored significantly higher on the satisfaction items related to reflection on practice and clinical learning. The qualitative results identified the following themes: the benefits of simulation prior to instruction; the value of performing a second simulation; and the importance of normalising errors.This doctoral study demonstrated that productive failure simulations improve nursing students' learning, perceptions and satisfaction levels. The thesis concludes with implications for nursing education, directions for further research, and recommendations for future practice.
590 $a School code: 1295.
650 4 $a Problem solving. $3 516855
650 4 $a Nursing education. $3 3685078
650 4 $a Failure. $3 3561225
650 4 $a Constructivism. $3 3563801
650 4 $a Success. $3 518195
650 4 $a Clinical medicine. $3 804916
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 529573
650 4 $a Skills. $3 3221615
650 4 $a Patients. $3 1961957
650 4 $a Error correction & detection. $3 3480646
650 4 $a Nursing care. $3 1962274
650 4 $a Flexibility. $3 3560705
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Health education. $3 559086
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Nursing. $3 528444
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0569
710 2 $a University of Technology Sydney (Australia). $3 3701578
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-04B.
790 $a 1295
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30610693