東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

"A Process That Works for Everybody"...

Connelly, Moira A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

"A Process That Works for Everybody": Prioritizing Intentionality and Conversation to Facilitate Inclusion in a Digitally-Mediated Collaborative Writing Process.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	"A Process That Works for Everybody": Prioritizing Intentionality and Conversation to Facilitate Inclusion in a Digitally-Mediated Collaborative Writing Process./
作者:	Connelly, Moira A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	181 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-06A.
標題:	English as a second language. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30813108
ISBN:	9798380922531

"A Process That Works for Everybody": Prioritizing Intentionality and Conversation to Facilitate Inclusion in a Digitally-Mediated Collaborative Writing Process.
Connelly, Moira A.

"A Process That Works for Everybody": Prioritizing Intentionality and Conversation to Facilitate Inclusion in a Digitally-Mediated Collaborative Writing Process. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 181 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Using participatory action research and a technofeminist rhetorical theoretical framework, this study considered what a collaborative writing process mediated by digital technology could look like when inclusion was a goal of the writing process. The study focused on writing team members' perceptions of inclusion in co-creating a digital annual report at a social justice organization in East Tennessee. The findings of this study indicated that a step toward inclusion in digitally-mediated collaborative writing is to recognize that digitally-mediated collaborative writing is an organizational process deserving of scrutiny based on inclusivity. Another key finding was that inclusion requires time to achieve because inclusion is based on collaboration, which can require more time than independent work.Other findings indicate that intentional planning, conversation, policies, and team self-assessment could facilitate inclusion. The planning process could include discussions about what digital tools will be used and optional training on digital tools for writing team members. Conversation topics could include the following: the purpose, audience, and content of the document; the timeline for document production and the role each writing team member will play based on other workplace commitments; the type of language that will be used in the document, including the avoidance of jargon; how edits will be handled; and organizational processes that might hinder collaboration and inclusion. Policies that might facilitate inclusion include setting situationally-specific expectations for inclusion in digitally-mediated{A0}collaborative writing and encouraging inter-dependence among co-writers (and co-workers). Post-co-creation team self-assessment may also facilitate inclusion in digitally-mediated collaborative writing.One implication of the study was that intentionality, accountability, troubleshooting may be attributes of digital writing teams moving toward inclusion. Also, the study implied that situating inclusion and digitally-mediated collaborative writing as affective processes could highlight the social nature of the processes to indicate points of social interaction where interventions could be made to facilitate inclusion. Another implication was that two additional tasks-training and troubleshooting--be added to Lowry et al.'s (2004) taxonomy of digitally-mediated collaborative writing. Additionally, methodological implications included the value of a letter of accountability from the academic researcher to community-based researchers and self-assessment by the academic researcher about reciprocity in participatory action research.

ISBN: 9798380922531Subjects--Topical Terms:

516208
English as a second language.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Collaborative writing

"A Process That Works for Everybody": Prioritizing Intentionality and Conversation to Facilitate Inclusion in a Digitally-Mediated Collaborative Writing Process.
LDR:03999nmm a2200397 4500 001 2395804
005 20240517105022.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380922531
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30813108
035 $a AAI30813108
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Connelly, Moira A. $3 3765306
245 1 0 $a "A Process That Works for Everybody": Prioritizing Intentionality and Conversation to Facilitate Inclusion in a Digitally-Mediated Collaborative Writing Process.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 181 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Vetter, Matthew.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Using participatory action research and a technofeminist rhetorical theoretical framework, this study considered what a collaborative writing process mediated by digital technology could look like when inclusion was a goal of the writing process. The study focused on writing team members' perceptions of inclusion in co-creating a digital annual report at a social justice organization in East Tennessee. The findings of this study indicated that a step toward inclusion in digitally-mediated collaborative writing is to recognize that digitally-mediated collaborative writing is an organizational process deserving of scrutiny based on inclusivity. Another key finding was that inclusion requires time to achieve because inclusion is based on collaboration, which can require more time than independent work.Other findings indicate that intentional planning, conversation, policies, and team self-assessment could facilitate inclusion. The planning process could include discussions about what digital tools will be used and optional training on digital tools for writing team members. Conversation topics could include the following: the purpose, audience, and content of the document; the timeline for document production and the role each writing team member will play based on other workplace commitments; the type of language that will be used in the document, including the avoidance of jargon; how edits will be handled; and organizational processes that might hinder collaboration and inclusion. Policies that might facilitate inclusion include setting situationally-specific expectations for inclusion in digitally-mediated{A0}collaborative writing and encouraging inter-dependence among co-writers (and co-workers). Post-co-creation team self-assessment may also facilitate inclusion in digitally-mediated collaborative writing.One implication of the study was that intentionality, accountability, troubleshooting may be attributes of digital writing teams moving toward inclusion. Also, the study implied that situating inclusion and digitally-mediated collaborative writing as affective processes could highlight the social nature of the processes to indicate points of social interaction where interventions could be made to facilitate inclusion. Another implication was that two additional tasks-training and troubleshooting--be added to Lowry et al.'s (2004) taxonomy of digitally-mediated collaborative writing. Additionally, methodological implications included the value of a letter of accountability from the academic researcher to community-based researchers and self-assessment by the academic researcher about reciprocity in participatory action research.
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
653 $a Collaborative writing
653 $a Digitally-mediated
653 $a Co-writers
653 $a Social justice
653 $a Digital technology
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $b English. $3 1026395
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-06A.
790 $a 0318
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30813108