東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Curtailing Reproductive Freedom Thro...

Staschus, Sophie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Curtailing Reproductive Freedom Through Choice: the Informed Consent Doctrine and "Abortion Regret" in U.S. Abortion Regulation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Curtailing Reproductive Freedom Through Choice: the Informed Consent Doctrine and "Abortion Regret" in U.S. Abortion Regulation./
作者:	Staschus, Sophie.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	267 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-01B.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30309393
ISBN:	9798379781002

Curtailing Reproductive Freedom Through Choice: the Informed Consent Doctrine and "Abortion Regret" in U.S. Abortion Regulation.
Staschus, Sophie.

Curtailing Reproductive Freedom Through Choice: the Informed Consent Doctrine and "Abortion Regret" in U.S. Abortion Regulation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 267 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Before the Dobbs v. Jackson (2022) decision overturned the constitutional right to abortion, the 21st century anti-choice movement was focused on establishing informed consent statutes as a means to discourage or prevent abortions. Often titled "A Woman's Right to Know," these laws require that patients are warned of alleged risks of breast cancer, infertility, and psychological trauma following abortions. In some states, patients must�undergo an ultrasound and wait at least 24-hours before receiving an abortion. These statutes have been shown to delay or hinder care.This dissertation is a genealogy of these informational requirements. I analyze how Roe v. Wade (1973) and ensuing abortion jurisprudence in the 1970s enshrined the abortion right in a medicalized framework of abortion access. This framing eschewed feminists' requests that women be solely responsible for deciding when and why to undergo an abortion. Instead, the Court articulated a qualified first-trimester privacy right in which pregnant women were tasked with making a responsible abortion decision in consultation with their physician.Through historical and legislative analysis, this dissertation traces how the medicalized right to abortion enabled the later development of informed consent statutes. The informed consent doctrine ideally seeks to protect patient autonomy from medical paternalism. But the noun "patient" acts as a qualifier that configures someone's autonomy and available choices according to their status as a patient. The doctrine was thus an ideal vehicle for anti-choice efforts to implement restrictions meant to protect abortion patients. It enabled statutes that nominally promoted pregnant women's autonomy, while infusing informational requirements with religious views of well-being that confused motherhood with health. I contend that the discourse of "abortion regret", which produced motherhood as the rational, retroactive, even if foregone choice, legitimized these informational requirements. From Roe onwards, pregnant people were tasked with making responsible abortion decisions in light of their health. Throughout the decades, however, 1) how "women's health" was conceptualized and 2) whether physicians or the State were the rightful shepherds of the abortion decision became battlegrounds for pro- and anti-choice organizing.

ISBN: 9798379781002Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Abortion jurisprudence

Curtailing Reproductive Freedom Through Choice: the Informed Consent Doctrine and "Abortion Regret" in U.S. Abortion Regulation.
LDR:03667nmm a2200397 4500 001 2395196
005 20240517100356.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379781002
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30309393
035 $a AAI30309393
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Staschus, Sophie. $3 3764697
245 1 0 $a Curtailing Reproductive Freedom Through Choice: the Informed Consent Doctrine and "Abortion Regret" in U.S. Abortion Regulation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 267 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Hartouni, Valerie;Horwitz, Robert.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Before the Dobbs v. Jackson (2022) decision overturned the constitutional right to abortion, the 21st century anti-choice movement was focused on establishing informed consent statutes as a means to discourage or prevent abortions. Often titled "A Woman's Right to Know," these laws require that patients are warned of alleged risks of breast cancer, infertility, and psychological trauma following abortions. In some states, patients must�undergo an ultrasound and wait at least 24-hours before receiving an abortion. These statutes have been shown to delay or hinder care.This dissertation is a genealogy of these informational requirements. I analyze how Roe v. Wade (1973) and ensuing abortion jurisprudence in the 1970s enshrined the abortion right in a medicalized framework of abortion access. This framing eschewed feminists' requests that women be solely responsible for deciding when and why to undergo an abortion. Instead, the Court articulated a qualified first-trimester privacy right in which pregnant women were tasked with making a responsible abortion decision in consultation with their physician.Through historical and legislative analysis, this dissertation traces how the medicalized right to abortion enabled the later development of informed consent statutes. The informed consent doctrine ideally seeks to protect patient autonomy from medical paternalism. But the noun "patient" acts as a qualifier that configures someone's autonomy and available choices according to their status as a patient. The doctrine was thus an ideal vehicle for anti-choice efforts to implement restrictions meant to protect abortion patients. It enabled statutes that nominally promoted pregnant women's autonomy, while infusing informational requirements with religious views of well-being that confused motherhood with health. I contend that the discourse of "abortion regret", which produced motherhood as the rational, retroactive, even if foregone choice, legitimized these informational requirements. From Roe onwards, pregnant people were tasked with making responsible abortion decisions in light of their health. Throughout the decades, however, 1) how "women's health" was conceptualized and 2) whether physicians or the State were the rightful shepherds of the abortion decision became battlegrounds for pro- and anti-choice organizing.
590 $a School code: 0033.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Medical ethics. $3 526828
653 $a Abortion jurisprudence
653 $a Anti-choice movement
653 $a Informed consent doctrine
653 $a Patient autonomy
653 $a Regret
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0497
710 2 $a University of California, San Diego. $b Communication. $3 1281534
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-01B.
790 $a 0033
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30309393