東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Role of Political Alliance in Global...

Ofori, Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Role of Political Alliance in Global News Framing and Source Attribution Strategies: A Comparison of US, UK, China and India's News Coverage of the Russia-Ukraine War.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Role of Political Alliance in Global News Framing and Source Attribution Strategies: A Comparison of US, UK, China and India's News Coverage of the Russia-Ukraine War./
作者:	Ofori, Michael.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	148 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-03.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30725497
ISBN:	9798380308830

Role of Political Alliance in Global News Framing and Source Attribution Strategies: A Comparison of US, UK, China and India's News Coverage of the Russia-Ukraine War.
Ofori, Michael.

Role of Political Alliance in Global News Framing and Source Attribution Strategies: A Comparison of US, UK, China and India's News Coverage of the Russia-Ukraine War. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 148 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--Bowling Green State University, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Media affect audience cognition and impact public and foreign policy decisions. People are influenced by the news narratives, and the sources from which the media obtain their information to report on political, economic, social, and security events influence what audiences internalize from the news. This study examines news narratives surrounding the Russia-Ukraine war from four media outlets within the two political camps: NATO allies (US and UK) and nonNATO allies (China and India). Through a document analysis of official government announcements for government positions and content analysis of news articles (n =230) examined for their news framing and source attribution strategies within the New York Times (US), Guardian (UK), China Daily (China), and The Times of India (India), the study finds that media objectivity remains a myth to news reporting and the unavailability of competing frames in the news report on the war across the media is an evidence of news reporting bias. The higher use of pro-Ukrainian sources within NATO ally media and pro-Russian sources within nonNATO ally media showed that political alliances influence media portrayal. Attribution of the cause of the war differed significantly across media with NATO ally media attributing the cause of the war to Russia/Putin whereas Chinese media made attributions to NATO and its allies (especially the U.S.). The research finds that the New York Times, the Guardian, and The Times of India used more provocative narratives against Putin/Russia in their news report, whereas China Daily's use of provocative narratives targeted only NATO. This research confirms the indexing and media propaganda hypothesis in reporting political and security events. The research also finds that news framing of the Russia-Ukraine war across both the NATO ally and non-NATO ally news outlets corresponded with the news media's home government's position of the conflict with US and UK media being pro-Ukrainian and China and Indian media being neutral but more sympathetic towards Russia. This suggests that news framing and source attribution during conflict lacks objectivity, and the presentation of biased information could create less informed citizens. Recommendations and limitations of the study are discussed in this study.

ISBN: 9798380308830Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Media framing

Role of Political Alliance in Global News Framing and Source Attribution Strategies: A Comparison of US, UK, China and India's News Coverage of the Russia-Ukraine War.
LDR:03760nmm a2200445 4500 001 2394926
005 20240513061047.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380308830
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30725497
035 $a (MiAaPQ)OhioLINKbgsu1683372925791365
035 $a AAI30725497
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ofori, Michael. $3 3764423
245 1 0 $a Role of Political Alliance in Global News Framing and Source Attribution Strategies: A Comparison of US, UK, China and India's News Coverage of the Russia-Ukraine War.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 148 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Bowling Green State University, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Media affect audience cognition and impact public and foreign policy decisions. People are influenced by the news narratives, and the sources from which the media obtain their information to report on political, economic, social, and security events influence what audiences internalize from the news. This study examines news narratives surrounding the Russia-Ukraine war from four media outlets within the two political camps: NATO allies (US and UK) and nonNATO allies (China and India). Through a document analysis of official government announcements for government positions and content analysis of news articles (n =230) examined for their news framing and source attribution strategies within the New York Times (US), Guardian (UK), China Daily (China), and The Times of India (India), the study finds that media objectivity remains a myth to news reporting and the unavailability of competing frames in the news report on the war across the media is an evidence of news reporting bias. The higher use of pro-Ukrainian sources within NATO ally media and pro-Russian sources within nonNATO ally media showed that political alliances influence media portrayal. Attribution of the cause of the war differed significantly across media with NATO ally media attributing the cause of the war to Russia/Putin whereas Chinese media made attributions to NATO and its allies (especially the U.S.). The research finds that the New York Times, the Guardian, and The Times of India used more provocative narratives against Putin/Russia in their news report, whereas China Daily's use of provocative narratives targeted only NATO. This research confirms the indexing and media propaganda hypothesis in reporting political and security events. The research also finds that news framing of the Russia-Ukraine war across both the NATO ally and non-NATO ally news outlets corresponded with the news media's home government's position of the conflict with US and UK media being pro-Ukrainian and China and Indian media being neutral but more sympathetic towards Russia. This suggests that news framing and source attribution during conflict lacks objectivity, and the presentation of biased information could create less informed citizens. Recommendations and limitations of the study are discussed in this study.
590 $a School code: 0018.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 3422380
653 $a Media framing
653 $a Russia-Ukraine war
653 $a Source attribution
653 $a Quantitative content analysis
653 $a Audiences
653 $a Political alliances
653 $a News narratives
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0391
710 2 $a Bowling Green State University. $b Media and Communication. $3 1683331
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-03.
790 $a 0018
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30725497