東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Why Congress Has Not Passed Facial R...

Robertson, Kecia Treviri.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Why Congress Has Not Passed Facial Recognition Technology Legislation for Public Spaces.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Why Congress Has Not Passed Facial Recognition Technology Legislation for Public Spaces./
作者:	Robertson, Kecia Treviri.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	205 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-12A.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29213525
ISBN:	9798438795629

Why Congress Has Not Passed Facial Recognition Technology Legislation for Public Spaces.
Robertson, Kecia Treviri.

Why Congress Has Not Passed Facial Recognition Technology Legislation for Public Spaces. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 205 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Facial recognition technology (FRT) in public spaces has been a political and social concern for more than 30 years. Conflict exists between the use of FRT for safety and security measures and its possible violation of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Additional controversial issues surrounding the use of FRT in public spaces include technological development without standardization or regulations; biometric algorithms developed with bias; and the social issues of privacy intrusion, gender and racial bias, data security, accuracy, and privacy concerns. Researchers have concurred a national policy is needed to address FRT issues but have not explained why Congress has been unsuccessful. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore the factors explaining this phenomenon. The narrative policy framework was used as the theoretical paradigm for this inquiry. Using Saldana's method of coding, categorizing and theming descriptive narratives, transcripts from hearings conducted by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform tasked with formulating FRT legislation were analyzed. The result of the analysis was the emergence of 10 factors identifying why FRT legislation was stalemated in Congress. The summative assertion from the factors revealed members of the committee were overwhelmed with the complexities of FRT. Several strategies were recommended which may advance the passage of a national FRT policy. If Congress employed these strategies and passed a national policy that alleviated FRT issues to the extent possible, positive social change regarding FRT usage in public spaces may occur.

ISBN: 9798438795629Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Congressional action to regulate FRT

Why Congress Has Not Passed Facial Recognition Technology Legislation for Public Spaces.
LDR:03034nmm a2200409 4500 001 2394341
005 20240422070831.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798438795629
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29213525
035 $a AAI29213525
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Robertson, Kecia Treviri. $3 3763811
245 1 0 $a Why Congress Has Not Passed Facial Recognition Technology Legislation for Public Spaces.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 205 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Brewer, Michael.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Facial recognition technology (FRT) in public spaces has been a political and social concern for more than 30 years. Conflict exists between the use of FRT for safety and security measures and its possible violation of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Additional controversial issues surrounding the use of FRT in public spaces include technological development without standardization or regulations; biometric algorithms developed with bias; and the social issues of privacy intrusion, gender and racial bias, data security, accuracy, and privacy concerns. Researchers have concurred a national policy is needed to address FRT issues but have not explained why Congress has been unsuccessful. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore the factors explaining this phenomenon. The narrative policy framework was used as the theoretical paradigm for this inquiry. Using Saldana's method of coding, categorizing and theming descriptive narratives, transcripts from hearings conducted by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform tasked with formulating FRT legislation were analyzed. The result of the analysis was the emergence of 10 factors identifying why FRT legislation was stalemated in Congress. The summative assertion from the factors revealed members of the committee were overwhelmed with the complexities of FRT. Several strategies were recommended which may advance the passage of a national FRT policy. If Congress employed these strategies and passed a national policy that alleviated FRT issues to the extent possible, positive social change regarding FRT usage in public spaces may occur.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Law enforcement. $3 607408
653 $a Congressional action to regulate FRT
653 $a Facial recognition policy for public spaces
653 $a Facial recognition technology
653 $a FRT legislation policy
653 $a National facial recognition policy
653 $a Privacy and protection of FRT in public spaces
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0206
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Public Policy and Administration. $3 1026795
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-12A.
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29213525