東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Developing Physical Literacy and Sel...

Taylor, Matt.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Developing Physical Literacy and Self-Efficacy: Supporting Student Autonomy in High School Physical Education Through Assessment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Developing Physical Literacy and Self-Efficacy: Supporting Student Autonomy in High School Physical Education Through Assessment./
作者:	Taylor, Matt.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	108 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-07.
標題:	Physical education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30989075
ISBN:	9798381384154

Developing Physical Literacy and Self-Efficacy: Supporting Student Autonomy in High School Physical Education Through Assessment.
Taylor, Matt.

Developing Physical Literacy and Self-Efficacy: Supporting Student Autonomy in High School Physical Education Through Assessment. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 108 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07.

Thesis (M.A.)--Royal Roads University (Canada), 2024.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study addresses concerns surrounding the decline in engagement in optional physical education programs. To enhance student engagement, the study aimed to align physical education courses with principles of self-determination theory, focusing on the role of competence in supporting autonomy. The intervention involved the assessment of competence through various fitness tests. Particular instruments, such as the Vertical Jump and 30 Meter Sprint Tests observed high levels of student preference and perceived significance. Interestingly, while the Multistage Fitness Test was identified by students as a reliable indicator of physical fitness, it garnered limited student selection. Additionally, the study incorporated movements from the Functional Movement Screen™ to cultivate student awareness of common movement pattern intricacies. While specific movement recommendations are not outlined, the findings underscore several noteworthy considerations. Notably, various factors influence student choices in student-selected fitness assessments, and purpose-driven fitness assessments can contribute to student motivation. The study's insights provide valuable guidance for structuring physical education programs to foster engagement and autonomy among students. Lastly, this study highlights the potential of alternative methods such as co-teaching and amalgamation to deliver responsive and differentiated physical education instruction, addressing resource limitations, and promoting enhanced student engagement and skill development.

ISBN: 9798381384154Subjects--Topical Terms:

635343
Physical education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Autonomy

Developing Physical Literacy and Self-Efficacy: Supporting Student Autonomy in High School Physical Education Through Assessment.
LDR:02800nmm a2200397 4500 001 2393734
005 20240414211534.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381384154
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30989075
035 $a AAI30989075
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Taylor, Matt. $3 3763208
245 1 0 $a Developing Physical Literacy and Self-Efficacy: Supporting Student Autonomy in High School Physical Education Through Assessment.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 108 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07.
500 $a Advisor: MacLeod, Kevin.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Royal Roads University (Canada), 2024.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study addresses concerns surrounding the decline in engagement in optional physical education programs. To enhance student engagement, the study aimed to align physical education courses with principles of self-determination theory, focusing on the role of competence in supporting autonomy. The intervention involved the assessment of competence through various fitness tests. Particular instruments, such as the Vertical Jump and 30 Meter Sprint Tests observed high levels of student preference and perceived significance. Interestingly, while the Multistage Fitness Test was identified by students as a reliable indicator of physical fitness, it garnered limited student selection. Additionally, the study incorporated movements from the Functional Movement Screen™ to cultivate student awareness of common movement pattern intricacies. While specific movement recommendations are not outlined, the findings underscore several noteworthy considerations. Notably, various factors influence student choices in student-selected fitness assessments, and purpose-driven fitness assessments can contribute to student motivation. The study's insights provide valuable guidance for structuring physical education programs to foster engagement and autonomy among students. Lastly, this study highlights the potential of alternative methods such as co-teaching and amalgamation to deliver responsive and differentiated physical education instruction, addressing resource limitations, and promoting enhanced student engagement and skill development.
590 $a School code: 1313.
650 4 $a Physical education. $3 635343
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
653 $a Autonomy
653 $a Self-determination theory
653 $a Self-efficacy
653 $a Physical education courses
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0449
710 2 $a Royal Roads University (Canada). $b School of Education and Technology. $3 3189283
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-07.
790 $a 1313
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30989075