東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Implications of Online, Hybrid and I...

Yuan, Jinlong.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach./
作者:	Yuan, Jinlong.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	141 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02A.
標題:	Design. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260758
ISBN:	9798841776697

Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach.
Yuan, Jinlong.

Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 141 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Distance and Blended education have been studied and applied in many disciplines but there has been limited use and assessment of these learning modes for design studios. The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has forced education delivery methods in the United States to become more online/hybrid in the 2020 school year without much preparation. As schools slowly shift to post-pandemic teaching modes, it is necessary to examine and evaluate what was learned during the pandemic online environment for design education. Previous studies have examined the effectiveness of online delivery of design education by virtual design studios using advanced digital technologies and equipment on a variety of platforms to teach specific design skills. In this study, the researcher uses semi-structured interviews of design educators and a survey of design students to examine their experience with their online learning environment during the 2020 school year. The qualitative and quantitative results of the study shed light on the challenges of online design studio learning during the pandemic and revealed opportunities for improving future design studio education. Lack of social interactions during the pandemic online learning impacted students' motivation. The use of digital technologies improved communication efficiency, but there is also ineffective communication that negatively affected peer interaction and learning, which in turn affected student learning outcomes and learning satisfaction compared to in-person design studios. The results also revealed openings to promote fully online design education, with studio courses reconfigured using the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework and with properly trained design instructors. This hybrid learning environment would lead to students receiving an optimal learning experience that benefits from the advantages of in-person instructions along with the efficiency of digital technology-based learning platforms.

ISBN: 9798841776697Subjects--Topical Terms:

518875
Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Online design education

Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach.
LDR:03357nmm a2200421 4500 001 2393585
005 20240414211443.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798841776697
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29260758
035 $a AAI29260758
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yuan, Jinlong. $3 3763056
245 1 0 $a Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Brooks, Kenneth R.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Distance and Blended education have been studied and applied in many disciplines but there has been limited use and assessment of these learning modes for design studios. The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has forced education delivery methods in the United States to become more online/hybrid in the 2020 school year without much preparation. As schools slowly shift to post-pandemic teaching modes, it is necessary to examine and evaluate what was learned during the pandemic online environment for design education. Previous studies have examined the effectiveness of online delivery of design education by virtual design studios using advanced digital technologies and equipment on a variety of platforms to teach specific design skills. In this study, the researcher uses semi-structured interviews of design educators and a survey of design students to examine their experience with their online learning environment during the 2020 school year. The qualitative and quantitative results of the study shed light on the challenges of online design studio learning during the pandemic and revealed opportunities for improving future design studio education. Lack of social interactions during the pandemic online learning impacted students' motivation. The use of digital technologies improved communication efficiency, but there is also ineffective communication that negatively affected peer interaction and learning, which in turn affected student learning outcomes and learning satisfaction compared to in-person design studios. The results also revealed openings to promote fully online design education, with studio courses reconfigured using the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework and with properly trained design instructors. This hybrid learning environment would lead to students receiving an optimal learning experience that benefits from the advantages of in-person instructions along with the efficiency of digital technology-based learning platforms.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
653 $a Online design education
653 $a Hybrid teaching
653 $a Virtual design studios
653 $a COVID-19 pandemic
653 $a Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0447
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Design. $3 1682355
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02A.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260758