東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Health technology assessment, courts and the right to healthcare

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Health technology assessment, courts and the right to healthcare/ Daniel Wei Liang Wang.
作者:	Wang, Daniel Wei Liang.
出版者:	Abingdon, Oxon ;Routledge, : 2022.,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (xi, 202 p.) :ill.
內容註:	Introduction -- Priority-setting and the right to healthcare : synergies and tensions on the path to universal health coverage -- Priority-setting and health technology assessment -- Brazil : right to healthcare litigation : the problem and the institutional responses -- Colombia : demanding but undermining fair priority-setting via courts -- England :from Wednesbury unreasonableness to accountability for reasonableness -- Conclusion : institutionalizing, controlling,limiting and circumventing HTA via courts.
標題:	Medical care - Law and legislation - England. -
電子資源:	https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315149165
ISBN:	9781315149165

Health technology assessment, courts and the right to healthcare
Wang, Daniel Wei Liang.

Health technology assessment, courts and the right to healthcare[electronic resource] /Daniel Wei Liang Wang. - Abingdon, Oxon ;Routledge,2022. - 1 online resource (xi, 202 p.) :ill.

Introduction -- Priority-setting and the right to healthcare : synergies and tensions on the path to universal health coverage -- Priority-setting and health technology assessment -- Brazil : right to healthcare litigation : the problem and the institutional responses -- Colombia : demanding but undermining fair priority-setting via courts -- England :from Wednesbury unreasonableness to accountability for reasonableness -- Conclusion : institutionalizing, controlling,limiting and circumventing HTA via courts.

"Both developing and developed countries face an increasing mismatch between what patients expect to receive from healthcare and what the public healthcare systems can afford to provide. Where there has been a growing recognition ofthe entitlement to receive healthcare, the frustrated expectations with regards to the level of provision has led to lawsuits challenging the denial of funding for health treatments by public health systems. This book analyses the impact ofcourts and litigation on the way health systems set priorities and make rationing decisions. In particular, it focuses on how the judicial protection of the right to healthcare can impact the institutionalization, functioning and centrality of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for decisions about the funding of treatment. Based on the case study of three jurisdictions - Brazil, Colombia, and England - it shows that courts can be a key driver for the institutionalization ofHTA. These case studies show the paradoxes of judicial control, which can promote accountability and impair it, demand administrative competence and undermine bureaucratic capacities. The case studies offer a nuanced and evidence-informed understanding of these paradoxes in the context of health care by showing how the judicial control of priority-setting decisions in health care can be used to require and control an explicit scheme for health technology assessment, but can also limit and circumvent it"--

ISBN: 9781315149165Subjects--Topical Terms:

3730651
Medical care
--Law and legislation--England.Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: K3601

Dewey Class. No.: 344.04/1

Health technology assessment, courts and the right to healthcare
LDR:03146nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2378743
006 m d
007 cr nn muauu
008 250310s2022 enka ob 001 0 eng
020 $a 9781315149165 $q (ebook)
020 $a 1315149168 $q (ebook)
020 $a 9781351371315 $q (electronic bk. ; $q EPUB)
020 $a 1351371312 $q (electronic bk. ; $q EPUB)
020 $a 9781351371308 $q (electronic bk. ; $q Mobipocket)
020 $a 1351371304 $q (electronic bk. ; $q Mobipocket)
020 $a 9781351371322 $q (electronic bk. ; $q PDF)
020 $a 1351371320 $q (electronic bk. ; $q PDF)
020 $a 9781138554757 $q (hardback)
020 $a 9781032184913 $q (paperback)
035 $a (OCoLC)1266197271
035 $a 9781315149165
040 $a OCoLC-P $b eng $c OCoLC-P
041 0 $a eng
050 0 0 $a K3601
082 0 0 $a 344.04/1 $2 23
100 1 $a Wang, Daniel Wei Liang. $3 3730650
245 1 0 $a Health technology assessment, courts and the right to healthcare $h [electronic resource] / $c Daniel Wei Liang Wang.
260 $a Abingdon, Oxon ; $a New York, NY : $b Routledge, $c 2022.
300 $a 1 online resource (xi, 202 p.) : $b ill.
505 0 $a Introduction -- Priority-setting and the right to healthcare : synergies and tensions on the path to universal health coverage -- Priority-setting and health technology assessment -- Brazil : right to healthcare litigation : the problem and the institutional responses -- Colombia : demanding but undermining fair priority-setting via courts -- England :from Wednesbury unreasonableness to accountability for reasonableness -- Conclusion : institutionalizing, controlling,limiting and circumventing HTA via courts.
520 $a "Both developing and developed countries face an increasing mismatch between what patients expect to receive from healthcare and what the public healthcare systems can afford to provide. Where there has been a growing recognition ofthe entitlement to receive healthcare, the frustrated expectations with regards to the level of provision has led to lawsuits challenging the denial of funding for health treatments by public health systems. This book analyses the impact ofcourts and litigation on the way health systems set priorities and make rationing decisions. In particular, it focuses on how the judicial protection of the right to healthcare can impact the institutionalization, functioning and centrality of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for decisions about the funding of treatment. Based on the case study of three jurisdictions - Brazil, Colombia, and England - it shows that courts can be a key driver for the institutionalization ofHTA. These case studies show the paradoxes of judicial control, which can promote accountability and impair it, demand administrative competence and undermine bureaucratic capacities. The case studies offer a nuanced and evidence-informed understanding of these paradoxes in the context of health care by showing how the judicial control of priority-setting decisions in health care can be used to require and control an explicit scheme for health technology assessment, but can also limit and circumvent it"-- $c Provided by publisher.
650 0 $a Medical care $x Law and legislation $z England. $3 3730651
650 0 $a Medical care $x Law and legislation $z Brazil. $3 3730652
650 0 $a Medical care $x Law and legislation $z Colombia. $3 3730653
650 0 $a Medical care $z England $x Decision making. $3 3730654
650 0 $a Medical care $z Brazil $x Decision making. $3 3730655
650 0 $a Medical care $z Colombia $x Decision making. $3 3730656
650 0 $a Judicial process $z England. $3 3730657
650 0 $a Judicial process $z Brazil. $3 1086287
650 0 $a Judicial process $z Colombia. $3 3730658
650 0 $a Right to health $x Cases. $3 3730659
650 7 $a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Public Finance $2 bisacsh $3 1598650
650 7 $a LAW / General $2 bisacsh. $3 1812254
650 7 $a LAW / Comparative $2 bisacsh $3 3730660
655 4 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
856 4 0 $u https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315149165