東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Towards collaborative planning and management of natural protected areas: A case study in the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Towards collaborative planning and management of natural protected areas: A case study in the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan./
作者:	Lee, Kuang-Chung.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2001,
面頁冊數:	322 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10, Section: C.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International78-10C.
標題:	Wildlife management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=U644294
ISBN:	9781339315843

Towards collaborative planning and management of natural protected areas: A case study in the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan.
Lee, Kuang-Chung.

Towards collaborative planning and management of natural protected areas: A case study in the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2001 - 322 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10, Section: C.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of London, University College London (United Kingdom), 2001.

The purpose of this study is to explore what contributions a collaborative planning approach can make to achieving more sustainable solutions to the management of protected areas in Taiwan. Among the three designations of natural protected areas in Taiwan, the Wildlife Refuge is notable because its legal status provides more opportunities for stakeholder participation than other statutory designations. Drawing on a theory of collaborative planning advanced by Healey (1997, 1998a) this study provides an in-depth analysis of the history of the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative approach to planning and management. A historical review of institutional practices suggests that several attempts have been made to move towards a more collaborative approach to natural areas planning and management in Taiwan. For example, devolution of power to the local government on a legal basis, some involvement of local people and conservation NGOs in the planning process on a legal basis, and establishment of formal instruments of policy, such as management plans and advisory committees. These are all ways of encouraging government institutions and scientists to work together in processes of planning and management. However, these practices mainly involve establishing formal arenas to foster the implementation of official 'plans' and their imposition on local areas. Local knowledge and local people are still marginalized in the planning process. Public meetings convened as part of the research were held with local farmers, tourists, and local management authorities and provided new inclusionary and communicative forums and arenas that were appreciated by most participants. The meetings discussed a range of issues based on local knowledge previously not addressed in traditional planning meetings. The meetings also involved local people who had previously been excluded from traditional planning processes. Such meetings brought together local people and the local management authorities in a face-to-face, consensus-building process. The meetings demonstrated how new political instruments designed to build social capacity amongst all relevant stakeholders can be used as a means of mobilising collaborative actions associated with the management of the local area. Detailed qualitative analysis of the record of these public meetings reveals that the main management problem of the Formosan Salmon Refuge Area arises from the different priorities given by stakeholders to two concepts: 'livelihoods of people' and 'the well-being of wildlife.' A sustainable solution to the long term management of the area will require a continuing programme of collaborative planning so that agreement can be reached about how these two goals can be reconciled. Recommendations about the forms such approaches might take are suggested based on a theoretically informed and explicit evaluation of the case study.

ISBN: 9781339315843Subjects--Topical Terms:

571816
Wildlife management.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Protected areas

Towards collaborative planning and management of natural protected areas: A case study in the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan.
LDR:04161nmm a2200349 4500 001 2366011
005 20240918072829.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241017s2001 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339315843
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAIU644294
035 $a (MiAaPQ)RLUKUniversityCollegeLondonU0284
035 $a AAIU644294
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lee, Kuang-Chung. $3 574276
245 1 0 $a Towards collaborative planning and management of natural protected areas: A case study in the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2001
300 $a 322 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10, Section: C.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of London, University College London (United Kingdom), 2001.
520 $a The purpose of this study is to explore what contributions a collaborative planning approach can make to achieving more sustainable solutions to the management of protected areas in Taiwan. Among the three designations of natural protected areas in Taiwan, the Wildlife Refuge is notable because its legal status provides more opportunities for stakeholder participation than other statutory designations. Drawing on a theory of collaborative planning advanced by Healey (1997, 1998a) this study provides an in-depth analysis of the history of the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative approach to planning and management. A historical review of institutional practices suggests that several attempts have been made to move towards a more collaborative approach to natural areas planning and management in Taiwan. For example, devolution of power to the local government on a legal basis, some involvement of local people and conservation NGOs in the planning process on a legal basis, and establishment of formal instruments of policy, such as management plans and advisory committees. These are all ways of encouraging government institutions and scientists to work together in processes of planning and management. However, these practices mainly involve establishing formal arenas to foster the implementation of official 'plans' and their imposition on local areas. Local knowledge and local people are still marginalized in the planning process. Public meetings convened as part of the research were held with local farmers, tourists, and local management authorities and provided new inclusionary and communicative forums and arenas that were appreciated by most participants. The meetings discussed a range of issues based on local knowledge previously not addressed in traditional planning meetings. The meetings also involved local people who had previously been excluded from traditional planning processes. Such meetings brought together local people and the local management authorities in a face-to-face, consensus-building process. The meetings demonstrated how new political instruments designed to build social capacity amongst all relevant stakeholders can be used as a means of mobilising collaborative actions associated with the management of the local area. Detailed qualitative analysis of the record of these public meetings reveals that the main management problem of the Formosan Salmon Refuge Area arises from the different priorities given by stakeholders to two concepts: 'livelihoods of people' and 'the well-being of wildlife.' A sustainable solution to the long term management of the area will require a continuing programme of collaborative planning so that agreement can be reached about how these two goals can be reconciled. Recommendations about the forms such approaches might take are suggested based on a theoretically informed and explicit evaluation of the case study.
590 $a School code: 6022.
650 4 $a Wildlife management. $3 571816
653 $a Protected areas
653 $a Taiwan
690 $a 0286
690 $a 0474
710 2 $a University of London, University College London (United Kingdom). $b Department of Geography. $3 3707299
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 78-10C.
790 $a 6022
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=U644294