東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Cutting Out the Middleperson : = An Interests-Based Account of Animals' Legal Inclusion.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Cutting Out the Middleperson :/
其他題名:	An Interests-Based Account of Animals' Legal Inclusion.
作者:	Rutledge-Prior, Serrin E.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (213 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-09, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-09B.
標題:	Dog racing. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30283483click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798374426908

Cutting Out the Middleperson : = An Interests-Based Account of Animals' Legal Inclusion.
Rutledge-Prior, Serrin E.

Cutting Out the Middleperson :An Interests-Based Account of Animals' Legal Inclusion. - 1 online resource (213 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-09, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Australian National University (Australia), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

What are the key structural barriers that are preventing animals from gaining access to greater legal protection and, thus, greater justice? Animals are protected under welfare and anti-cruelty laws around the world and can even, under an interest theory account of rights, be said to have legal rights. Nevertheless, animals' legal inclusion remains severely limited in a range of ways: welfare laws protect economically and socially valuable practices that cause immense suffering to animals, the laws are poorly enforced by regulatory bodies, and animals have virtually no recourse to civil law remedies. This thesis focuses on the last of these problems, as one that has so far been under-researched in political theory. One solution that has been proposed is to have (at least certain) animals recognised as "legal persons", alongside humans and corporations. This proposal, however, is undesirable in that legal personhood is an exclusionary concept that is poorly understood, and inconsistently applied, within the legal system. This thesis instead suggests that the legal system recognise a new model of inclusion that is flexible enough to encompass the interests of humans, animals, and non-animal entities. The interest principle of legal inclusion holds that no entity with judicable interests is to be excluded from seeking justice through the legal system - especially not on the basis of their species status. This principle, in relying on existing legal tools and concepts that can straightforwardly be applied to all interest-bearing entities, provides a firmer path forward for animals' legal inclusion than does that of legal personhood.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798374426908Subjects--Topical Terms:

3706613
Dog racing.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Cutting Out the Middleperson : = An Interests-Based Account of Animals' Legal Inclusion.
LDR:03083nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2365742
005 20231218204655.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798374426908
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30283483
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AustNatlU1885271543
035 $a AAI30283483
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Rutledge-Prior, Serrin E. $3 3706612
245 1 0 $a Cutting Out the Middleperson : $b An Interests-Based Account of Animals' Legal Inclusion.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (213 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-09, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Dowding, Keith;Oprea, Alexandra;Barry, Christian.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Australian National University (Australia), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a What are the key structural barriers that are preventing animals from gaining access to greater legal protection and, thus, greater justice? Animals are protected under welfare and anti-cruelty laws around the world and can even, under an interest theory account of rights, be said to have legal rights. Nevertheless, animals' legal inclusion remains severely limited in a range of ways: welfare laws protect economically and socially valuable practices that cause immense suffering to animals, the laws are poorly enforced by regulatory bodies, and animals have virtually no recourse to civil law remedies. This thesis focuses on the last of these problems, as one that has so far been under-researched in political theory. One solution that has been proposed is to have (at least certain) animals recognised as "legal persons", alongside humans and corporations. This proposal, however, is undesirable in that legal personhood is an exclusionary concept that is poorly understood, and inconsistently applied, within the legal system. This thesis instead suggests that the legal system recognise a new model of inclusion that is flexible enough to encompass the interests of humans, animals, and non-animal entities. The interest principle of legal inclusion holds that no entity with judicable interests is to be excluded from seeking justice through the legal system - especially not on the basis of their species status. This principle, in relying on existing legal tools and concepts that can straightforwardly be applied to all interest-bearing entities, provides a firmer path forward for animals' legal inclusion than does that of legal personhood.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Dog racing. $3 3706613
650 4 $a Bans. $3 3564372
650 4 $a Evidence. $3 583147
650 4 $a Victims of crime. $3 3682128
650 4 $a Political activism. $2 bicssc $3 2079578
650 4 $a Activists. $3 3562405
650 4 $a Age. $3 1486010
650 4 $a Enforcement. $3 3564162
650 4 $a Horse racing. $3 3383489
650 4 $a Cruelty to animals. $3 3703236
650 4 $a Trespassing. $3 3691766
650 4 $a Hogs. $3 3554056
650 4 $a Personhood. $3 888039
650 4 $a Legislation. $3 766385
650 4 $a Animal protection. $3 3690994
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Criminal investigations. $3 3564842
650 4 $a Cognitive ability. $3 3560491
650 4 $a Voters. $3 3703752
650 4 $a Animal cognition. $3 3563972
650 4 $a Poultry. $3 783852
650 4 $a Households. $3 579926
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 3174829
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0475
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The Australian National University (Australia). $3 1952885
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-09B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30283483 $z click for full text (PQDT)