東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Survival Rate of Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Sites - Systematic Review.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Survival Rate of Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Sites - Systematic Review./
Author:	Papisetti, Sravanthi.
Description:	1 online resource (71 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-03.
Subject:	Patients. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29283507click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798845435064

Survival Rate of Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Sites - Systematic Review.
Papisetti, Sravanthi.

Survival Rate of Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Sites - Systematic Review. - 1 online resource (71 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--West Virginia University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Introduction: It is not known so far performing Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) in a freshly extracted socket with intact walls would improve clinical outcomes of implants placed in these sites. It is not known whether different biomaterials and techniques would affect the survival of dental implants.Aim: The current systematic review is undertaken to assess the survival rate of dental implants placed in these sockets and to assess different socket graft materials as well as techniques of ridge preservation with regard to the survival of implants.Material methods: Search for relevant articles was done in Medline (PubMed). No restrictions were imposed with respect to the year of publications. Only the studies which mentioned that they placed dental implants in an extraction socket with intact walls were included.Results: With the initial search a total of 4,962 articles were obtained. Out of which 9 studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 3 case series, 1 prospective, 1 retrospective) were included. Of the included studies, 6 studies reported an implant survival rate (ISR) of 100%, two studies reported an ISR of 97.3% and one study reported an ISR of 95%. The need for further augmentation was significantly reduced if the socket underwent ARP at the time of extraction and this difference is statistically significant compared to naturally healed sites. After prosthetic loading of implants, these sites presented with minimal peri-implant marginal bone level changes.Conclusions: To conclude, ISR in an ARP site with an intact socket is 95%-100% with a mean of 98.8%. It was found that there is no statistically significant difference in ISR whether it is an ARP site or a site that underwent a natural healing process. Performing ARP even sockets intact reduce the need for further augmentation thereby simplifying the technique of implant placement while saving the time for the clinician as well as the patient.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798845435064Subjects--Topical Terms:

1961957
Patients.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Survival Rate of Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Sites - Systematic Review.
LDR:03249nmm a2200361K 4500 001 2365689
005 20231218204638.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798845435064
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29283507
035 $a (MiAaPQ)WVirginia11394
035 $a AAI29283507
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Papisetti, Sravanthi. $3 3706553
245 1 0 $a Survival Rate of Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Sites - Systematic Review.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (71 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03.
500 $a Advisor: Shakore, Arif Salman Abdul;Pizzini, Andrea;Panagakos, Fotinos.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--West Virginia University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Introduction: It is not known so far performing Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) in a freshly extracted socket with intact walls would improve clinical outcomes of implants placed in these sites. It is not known whether different biomaterials and techniques would affect the survival of dental implants.Aim: The current systematic review is undertaken to assess the survival rate of dental implants placed in these sockets and to assess different socket graft materials as well as techniques of ridge preservation with regard to the survival of implants.Material methods: Search for relevant articles was done in Medline (PubMed). No restrictions were imposed with respect to the year of publications. Only the studies which mentioned that they placed dental implants in an extraction socket with intact walls were included.Results: With the initial search a total of 4,962 articles were obtained. Out of which 9 studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 3 case series, 1 prospective, 1 retrospective) were included. Of the included studies, 6 studies reported an implant survival rate (ISR) of 100%, two studies reported an ISR of 97.3% and one study reported an ISR of 95%. The need for further augmentation was significantly reduced if the socket underwent ARP at the time of extraction and this difference is statistically significant compared to naturally healed sites. After prosthetic loading of implants, these sites presented with minimal peri-implant marginal bone level changes.Conclusions: To conclude, ISR in an ARP site with an intact socket is 95%-100% with a mean of 98.8%. It was found that there is no statistically significant difference in ISR whether it is an ARP site or a site that underwent a natural healing process. Performing ARP even sockets intact reduce the need for further augmentation thereby simplifying the technique of implant placement while saving the time for the clinician as well as the patient.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Patients. $3 1961957
650 4 $a Dental implants. $3 829051
650 4 $a Collagen. $3 892448
650 4 $a Blood vessels. $3 3561732
650 4 $a Prostheses. $3 3683608
650 4 $a Connective tissue. $3 3562992
650 4 $a Blood clots. $3 3682359
650 4 $a Quantitative analysis. $3 3452583
650 4 $a Bone marrow. $3 1621080
650 4 $a Biomedical materials. $3 605745
650 4 $a Mineralization. $3 3557941
650 4 $a Teeth. $3 1640005
650 4 $a Reading. $3 516229
650 4 $a Clinical outcomes. $3 3682127
650 4 $a Biomedical engineering. $3 535387
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 828971
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 586835
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0541
690 $a 0567
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0564
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a West Virginia University. $3 1017532
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-03.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29283507 $z click for full text (PQDT)