東華大學圖書館 |

Sanctuary/Temple in Genesis 1-3 : = A Reevaluation of the Biblical Evidence.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sanctuary/Temple in Genesis 1-3 :/
其他題名:	A Reevaluation of the Biblical Evidence.
作者:	Penuela-Pineda, Jahisber.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (326 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-04A.
標題:	Theology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13901905click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781085686655

Sanctuary/Temple in Genesis 1-3 : = A Reevaluation of the Biblical Evidence.
Penuela-Pineda, Jahisber.

Sanctuary/Temple in Genesis 1-3 :A Reevaluation of the Biblical Evidence. - 1 online resource (326 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Andrews University, 2019.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation reevaluates the most significant biblical evidence and theological implications involved in the debate over possible vocabulary pertaining to a sanctuary/temple motif in Gen 1-3. Thus, this study addresses the following research question: Is there evidence for the sanctuary/temple in the creation and Eden narratives, and if so, what are the implications of this evidence?Chapter I introduces the background to the problem by summarizing the most significant scholarly arguments for and against allusions to the sanctuary/temple in Gen 1-3. In addition, this chapter projects particular implications related to the interpretation of the Eden narratives (Gen 2:4b-3:24), the creation account (Gen 1:1-2:4a), and the theology of the sanctuary/temple in the biblical canon.Chapters II-III reexamine the biblical evidence in the Eden narratives of Gen 2-3, specifically the arguments arising from the Hebrew word עֵדֶן in Gen 2:8, the garden as a mountain in Gen 2:10, the river of Eden in Gen 2:10, the Hebrew verbs עָבַד andשָׁמַר in Gen 2:15, the Hebrew word צֵלָע and the Hebrew verb בָּנָה in Gen 2:21-22, the Hebrew participle מִתְהַלֵּךְ in Gen 3:8, the Hebrew word כֻּתֹּנֶת and the Hebrew verb לָבַשׁ in Gen 3:21, the Hebrew word כְּרֻבִים in Gen 3:24, and the eastern entrance to the garden in Gen 3:24. The discussion leads to the conclusion that the Garden of Eden and its cultic conceptual framework reflect the sanctuary/temple in the heavenly realm. Accordingly, the earthly sanctuary/temple (the wilderness tabernacle/Solomon's Temple) is not the only type of the heavenly counterpart: the Eden narratives of Gen 2-3 portray in vertical typology an equivalence of functionality (Ezek 28).Chapter IV reveals that the motif of temple building and the creation account of Gen 1:1-2:4a show a corresponding purpose by concluding with rest on the seventh day. This connection indicates that just as God governs from his sanctuary/temple (in the heavens), he governs the newly created earth (Gen 2:1-3; cf. Exod 20:11; 31:17; Pss 78:69; 132:7-8, 13-14; Isa 66:1-2). Similarly, the connection between the creation account and the sanctuary/temple motif is observed when the special vocabulary of the fourth day of the creation week is recognized (Gen 1:14-16), revealing the writer's intentionality to embed the historical narrative within a semantic or conceptual framework.Chapter V discusses the theological implications of the sanctuary/temple motif in Gen 1-3. The biblical evidence points to the interpretation of the beginning and end of Scripture (creation and re-creation) through the sanctuary/temple motif. Thus, the historical development of God's creative and redemptive acts is framed by the sanctuary/temple. This conclusion is reached when considering the equivalence of functionality between heaven and earth through vertical typology, a pattern that is prevalent in Scripture. Accordingly, this vertical typology approach establishes the concept of Eden as an archetypal framework from the beginning of the biblical narrative to the end of it, and even beyond Heilsgeschichte into eternity.Chapter VI summarizes the findings of this study. The reevaluation of the major biblical arguments for the sanctuary/temple motif reveals the presence of this motif both linguistically and conceptually in Gen 1-3. The protological and eschatological intertextual relationship comprehends a correlational semantical framework: the canonical/biblical narrative commences with Eden in heaven (Ezek 28), continues with Eden on Earth (Gen 2-3), and ends with a heavenly Eden on earth (Rev 22). Therefore, archetypically the Garden of Eden was, is, and will be the ideal place of rest in protology and eschatology.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781085686655Subjects--Topical Terms:

516533
Theology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

CosmosIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Sanctuary/Temple in Genesis 1-3 : = A Reevaluation of the Biblical Evidence.
LDR:05141nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2365625
005 20231212104214.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2019 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781085686655
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13901905
035 $a AAI13901905
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Penuela-Pineda, Jahisber. $3 3706486
245 1 0 $a Sanctuary/Temple in Genesis 1-3 : $b A Reevaluation of the Biblical Evidence.
264 0 $c 2019
300 $a 1 online resource (326 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Doukhan, Jacques B.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Andrews University, 2019.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation reevaluates the most significant biblical evidence and theological implications involved in the debate over possible vocabulary pertaining to a sanctuary/temple motif in Gen 1-3. Thus, this study addresses the following research question: Is there evidence for the sanctuary/temple in the creation and Eden narratives, and if so, what are the implications of this evidence?Chapter I introduces the background to the problem by summarizing the most significant scholarly arguments for and against allusions to the sanctuary/temple in Gen 1-3. In addition, this chapter projects particular implications related to the interpretation of the Eden narratives (Gen 2:4b-3:24), the creation account (Gen 1:1-2:4a), and the theology of the sanctuary/temple in the biblical canon.Chapters II-III reexamine the biblical evidence in the Eden narratives of Gen 2-3, specifically the arguments arising from the Hebrew word עֵדֶן in Gen 2:8, the garden as a mountain in Gen 2:10, the river of Eden in Gen 2:10, the Hebrew verbs עָבַד andשָׁמַר in Gen 2:15, the Hebrew word צֵלָע and the Hebrew verb בָּנָה in Gen 2:21-22, the Hebrew participle מִתְהַלֵּךְ in Gen 3:8, the Hebrew word כֻּתֹּנֶת and the Hebrew verb לָבַשׁ in Gen 3:21, the Hebrew word כְּרֻבִים in Gen 3:24, and the eastern entrance to the garden in Gen 3:24. The discussion leads to the conclusion that the Garden of Eden and its cultic conceptual framework reflect the sanctuary/temple in the heavenly realm. Accordingly, the earthly sanctuary/temple (the wilderness tabernacle/Solomon's Temple) is not the only type of the heavenly counterpart: the Eden narratives of Gen 2-3 portray in vertical typology an equivalence of functionality (Ezek 28).Chapter IV reveals that the motif of temple building and the creation account of Gen 1:1-2:4a show a corresponding purpose by concluding with rest on the seventh day. This connection indicates that just as God governs from his sanctuary/temple (in the heavens), he governs the newly created earth (Gen 2:1-3; cf. Exod 20:11; 31:17; Pss 78:69; 132:7-8, 13-14; Isa 66:1-2). Similarly, the connection between the creation account and the sanctuary/temple motif is observed when the special vocabulary of the fourth day of the creation week is recognized (Gen 1:14-16), revealing the writer's intentionality to embed the historical narrative within a semantic or conceptual framework.Chapter V discusses the theological implications of the sanctuary/temple motif in Gen 1-3. The biblical evidence points to the interpretation of the beginning and end of Scripture (creation and re-creation) through the sanctuary/temple motif. Thus, the historical development of God's creative and redemptive acts is framed by the sanctuary/temple. This conclusion is reached when considering the equivalence of functionality between heaven and earth through vertical typology, a pattern that is prevalent in Scripture. Accordingly, this vertical typology approach establishes the concept of Eden as an archetypal framework from the beginning of the biblical narrative to the end of it, and even beyond Heilsgeschichte into eternity.Chapter VI summarizes the findings of this study. The reevaluation of the major biblical arguments for the sanctuary/temple motif reveals the presence of this motif both linguistically and conceptually in Gen 1-3. The protological and eschatological intertextual relationship comprehends a correlational semantical framework: the canonical/biblical narrative commences with Eden in heaven (Ezek 28), continues with Eden on Earth (Gen 2-3), and ends with a heavenly Eden on earth (Rev 22). Therefore, archetypically the Garden of Eden was, is, and will be the ideal place of rest in protology and eschatology.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Theology. $3 516533
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
653 $a Cosmos
653 $a Creation
653 $a Genesis 1-3
653 $a Sanctuary
653 $a Tabernacle
653 $a Temple
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0469
690 $a 0321
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Andrews University. $b SDA Theological Seminary. $3 3545691
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-04A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13901905 $z click for full text (PQDT)