東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Cognitive responses to dissent : = Effects of conflict, curiosity, and evaluation apprehension on divergent thinking.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Cognitive responses to dissent :/
其他題名:	Effects of conflict, curiosity, and evaluation apprehension on divergent thinking.
作者:	Rogers, John David.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (123 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International62-02B.
標題:	Social psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9966548click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780599713185

Cognitive responses to dissent : = Effects of conflict, curiosity, and evaluation apprehension on divergent thinking.
Rogers, John David.

Cognitive responses to dissent :Effects of conflict, curiosity, and evaluation apprehension on divergent thinking. - 1 online resource (123 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 1999.

Includes bibliographical references

Minority dissent has been found to stimulate divergent thinking in many studies, but theories advanced to explain this relationship have not been studied with measurements of the mediating processes central to those theories. Recently, diminished self-confidence or "fear of invalidity" has been identified in several treatments as the primary response to dissent in the stimulation of divergent thinking. Review of relevant literature suggests that intrinsically motivated curiosity may be equally or even more important for explaining cognitive responses to dissent. This study was designed to provide an assessment of the respective roles of curiosity, evaluation apprehension, and conflict as mediators of the relationship between minority dissent and divergent thinking. An experiment was conducted using a computer-mediated discussion of a hypothetical business decision task, with instruction sets designed to produce conditions uniquely favorable to curiosity and evaluation apprehension. A confederate presented pre-scripted arguments against the majority position to produce dissent (and conflict). Participant ratings and content analysis of the group discussion transcripts provided measurements of the three processes after the experimental manipulations and before the measurement of outcome variables. Divergent thinking was measured by analyzing alternative solutions and a thought listing procedure provided by participants at the conclusion of the group discussion. None of the theoretical explanations for the effects of dissent on divergent thinking received strong support. Path analyses suggest that the relationship between dissent and divergent thinking may be mediated by processes not considered in this research. Results confirmed that dissent stimulated divergent thinking, but found no evidence for evaluation apprehension or conflict as mediators of the effect. Dissent had its strongest effects under conditions of anonymity. Curiosity received only weak support as a mediator, but was found to be a major element in participant reactions to the minority. It is likely that a complex combination of the above factors is operative in reactions to dissent, and future theories will have to account for interactions among them in order to provide satisfactory explanations. Additional research is urged to verify these results and to identify influences on responses to dissent that may have been previously overlooked.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780599713185Subjects--Topical Terms:

520219
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

ConflictIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Cognitive responses to dissent : = Effects of conflict, curiosity, and evaluation apprehension on divergent thinking.
LDR:03912nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2365461
005 20231213130724.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s1999 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780599713185
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9966548
035 $a AAI9966548
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Rogers, John David. $3 3706315
245 1 0 $a Cognitive responses to dissent : $b Effects of conflict, curiosity, and evaluation apprehension on divergent thinking.
264 0 $c 1999
300 $a 1 online resource (123 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 62-02, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Nemeth, Charlan J.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Minority dissent has been found to stimulate divergent thinking in many studies, but theories advanced to explain this relationship have not been studied with measurements of the mediating processes central to those theories. Recently, diminished self-confidence or "fear of invalidity" has been identified in several treatments as the primary response to dissent in the stimulation of divergent thinking. Review of relevant literature suggests that intrinsically motivated curiosity may be equally or even more important for explaining cognitive responses to dissent. This study was designed to provide an assessment of the respective roles of curiosity, evaluation apprehension, and conflict as mediators of the relationship between minority dissent and divergent thinking. An experiment was conducted using a computer-mediated discussion of a hypothetical business decision task, with instruction sets designed to produce conditions uniquely favorable to curiosity and evaluation apprehension. A confederate presented pre-scripted arguments against the majority position to produce dissent (and conflict). Participant ratings and content analysis of the group discussion transcripts provided measurements of the three processes after the experimental manipulations and before the measurement of outcome variables. Divergent thinking was measured by analyzing alternative solutions and a thought listing procedure provided by participants at the conclusion of the group discussion. None of the theoretical explanations for the effects of dissent on divergent thinking received strong support. Path analyses suggest that the relationship between dissent and divergent thinking may be mediated by processes not considered in this research. Results confirmed that dissent stimulated divergent thinking, but found no evidence for evaluation apprehension or conflict as mediators of the effect. Dissent had its strongest effects under conditions of anonymity. Curiosity received only weak support as a mediator, but was found to be a major element in participant reactions to the minority. It is likely that a complex combination of the above factors is operative in reactions to dissent, and future theories will have to account for interactions among them in order to provide satisfactory explanations. Additional research is urged to verify these results and to identify influences on responses to dissent that may have been previously overlooked.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Families & family life. $3 3422406
650 4 $a Personal relationships. $3 3422407
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Individual & family studies. $3 2122770
653 $a Conflict
653 $a Curiosity
653 $a Dissent
653 $a Divergent thinking
653 $a Evaluation apprehension
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0628
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $3 687832
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 62-02B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9966548 $z click for full text (PQDT)